this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
635 points (97.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

34949 readers
3459 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blargle@sh.itjust.works 62 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Python 27??? Does tech in the future go full circle and starts to look like windows XP again?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago
[–] artiman@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago

there is a better fork called forgejo

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 59 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Reject GitHub. Embrace Codeberg!

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I would love a subscription to Codeberg to be able to store private projects though. Codeberg is nice but you need an alternative for those special projects and it's annoying.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

If you work alone you can just use git local without a remote repo. Otherwise there is always self hosting forgejo (the software behind Codeberg). But I also expect there to be other hosting services for that purpose.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

can’t you set codeberg repositories to private?

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

You can but it's for specific stuff, not real projects. Everything should be open source and public by default.

I would gladly pay them to host private projects.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 48 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I prefer reading my code out loud and saving it as a Audio file

That's ridiculous.

I write mine on paper in cursive so no one can use it anywhere

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but do you organize the audio files when you make changes?

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You don't need GitHub for Git.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And for those who don't know: git was there first, then github offered it for code management (they are two different things, don't confuse git with github!)

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Git is so easy to host yourself and everyone went and handed over all their code to evil corp to farm on anyway.

(Though I do understand that they were bought, but that was a while ago and it was only a matter of time before the evil seeped in.)

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think you may be mixing up git, which is a command line tool that's still open source, AFAIK, with github that's a closed source, git-based code hosting platform bought by Microsoft.

You can use other hosting services with git, and get an almost identical experience. Gitlab does it, as well as many others.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You can serve up a git repository remotely very easily on any machine that has a remote access path.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago

It's such a simple reason tbh. Github is expected to stay online indefinitely. My VPS? As long as I pay the bill, which I may not want to at some point.

Codeberg is a decent middle ground - open source projects only. The site itself is open source too.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 4 points 2 months ago

Their CI/CD minutes are very generous (unlimited!). Plus, if Microsoft wanted to scrape code, it doesn't have to be on Github. They can scrape it off codeberg too. And I can be sure Github won't shut down.

If Github does decide to screw users over, switching to self-hosted forgejo would be trivial.

[–] PacMan@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Armatures!

Project. New Project.new.new

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] psoul@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Untitled.new.new.optionB.MomsVersion.final.FINALFORREALTHISTIME.jokehaha.okOneMoreEdit.typo.killMePlz (copy 2)

[–] TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Project. New Project.new.new

What kind of OOP hell have I fallen into here?

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s a small thing but I appreciate how you didn’t use the image of the rapper of the original meme who seems like an overall terrible person.

[–] Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fuck Drake. Me and all my homies hate Drake

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah I don’t get how he was taken so seriously for so long by so many. I get that not every rapper needs to come from a broken and messed up background, but his verses don’t hit that hard due to all the inauthenticity, as if he did grow up on hard streets lol.

[–] whats_a_lemmy@midwest.social 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago
[–] JelleWho@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I like git(hub) because you can track changes. Not just versions

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 22 points 2 months ago

Just use git. It’s what all these front ends use at their core. It’s all just git which doesn’t need any hosting at all. If all you want is tracking changes you don’t even need to set up a remote to push / pull from. Just install git on your local development machine, make a folder for you project, and run ‘git init’. Now you have a local repo which can track and commit changes and you have all of the incredibly powerful tools available that git provides with ample documentation. Wanna back it up? Just backup the folder with any standard backup application like any other folder.

[–] original_reader@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Gitlab, Gogs, Gitea... you can run all those locally.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

But how often do you need that for your personal projects? I just have a git repo on a server that's accessible by ssh. I only use a web frontend when I have to share with other people and then you might as well use a free third party service.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You don't need it on a server even. For simple versioning just use a local git repo without any bells and stuff

[–] 404@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

One of the most useful features is rolling back from origin when you've borked your local repo (not that I ever have.............)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dan@upvote.au 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The bottom picture should be SVN. I miss incremental revision numbers.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

The mixed-revisions bug was fun... Also cannot clean history or make shitty branches everywhere, it was one of my worst experience. Nowadays Jujutsu is my favorite.

[–] original_reader@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

SVN is still great if there is a need for strict access controls and central control matters a lot. Auditing is also a bit easier with SVN.

It caters more for a linear workflow, though. So modern large teams won't find joy with SVN.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

It caters more for a linear workflow, though. So modern large teams won't find joy with SVN

For what it's worth, I work at a FAANG company and we don't use branches at all. Instead, we use feature flags. Source control history is linear with no merges.

All code changes have to go though code review before they can be committed to the main repo. Pull requests are usually not too large (we aim for ~300 lines max), contain a single commit, aren't long-lived (often merged the same day they're submitted unless they're very controversial), can be stacked to handle dependencies between them ("stacked diffs"), and a whole stack can be landed together. When merged, everything is committed directly to the main branch, which all developers are working off of.

I know that both Google and Meta take this approach, and probably other companies too.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bruncvik@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Owned by Microsoft. Microsoft recently blocked e-mail access to a LibreOffice dev. Speculation is that they'll start blocking projects for competing products next.

(Alternative explanation: Gitlab should be part of IT divestment from US-based services.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›