this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
322 points (97.1% liked)

Uplifting News

16781 readers
70 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The 193-member world body approved [September 13] a nonbinding resolution endorsing the “New York Declaration,” which sets out a phased plan to end the nearly 80-year conflict. The vote was 142-10 with 12 abstentions.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 69 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the approach that's failing since 80 years surely going to work this time.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was always going to be a one-state solution. I’d hoped that state would be a pluralistic home for the Israelis and Palestinians, but they’re closer than ever to slamming the door tight on a single ethnostate for Jews, with not so much as a disputed territory beside.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

a pluralistic home for the Israelis and Palestinians

Would be a welcome change if diplomatic efforts at least started to attempt a different approach such as this instead of sticking to the same formula that fails since eight decades.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is that it’s a non-starter for the Israelis, who want a formal Jewish ethnostate, not a pluralistic society where they happen to have good representation. Israel is a modern society and despite their best efforts, their birth rate is declining just like every other modern nation. This is a long term problem for them, being massively outnumbered by Muslims in the surrounding region, and having already 2 million Arabs living in Israel, or 20% of the nation. They fear they will fall behind demographically and their grand project will become just another Islamofacist state over time.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

And… I guess this is why American conservatism is such an ally?

The “displacement” of ‘traditional’ American Christians (subtext: white) is viewed as an existential issue, and I guess it’s because the birth rates+immigration of other groups is so much higher. This is why they want to end birthright citizenship, clamp down immigration and such, yet still focus on boosting birth rates; its viewed as existential cultural displacement.

Same as some Israelis feel I guess. Do nothing, and Muslims will crowd out Jews. I never really thought about that.


Being afraid of religions or races mixing is, of course, beyond bonkers. I'm ashamed Americans are so afraid of their country turning an ambiguous brown, like its some scary future.

But I guess I see the link more clearly than I did before. MAGA’s support of Israel otherwise feels kinda weird given their antisemetic undercurrents.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well they might be antisemitic but they hate Arabs too, and with a much less complicated, pure and dehumanizing hatred. At least Jewish people can be mistaken for white.

Plus, if you hate Jews, don’t you want them to have their own country to fuck off to? And if they destabilize and oppress the Arab world in the process? Win-win.

Jewish interests are also just better mobilized in the US. They have a good story as our best ally in a fucked region, and they’ve succeeded in telling that story. As far back as Abraham Lincoln there has also been compassion for the Jewish people and a desire to see them in a secure homeland. But at this point that seems to be a distant third or fourth in terms of motivations to support Israel.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think you underestimate hardcore MAGA's antisemitism, lol. And slightly overestimate the racism (which is more 'oldschool')

You are not wrong about Jewish mobilization.

There's just different stories told to different people, I think. Evangelical purists get the 'cultural contamination' story to sympathize with (as that's what they want in the US). Old folks get the decades-old broadcast TV version of Israel. MAGA and oldschool Republicans get the radical islam angle, hardcore MAGA gets a kind of altered reality where Trump is actually the anti-interventionists here (as they still hate Israel), he's just working towards that, somehow.

I really think most of the branding isn't 'brown people.' Even though there is a lot of islamophobia in the US, one of MAGA's core tenants is technically non-interventionalism, and most appeals to racism aren't so explicit.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

There's just different stories told to different people, I think.

Yeah that’s a smart take. Most things work that way.

one of MAGA's core tenants is technically non-interventionalism

(friendly spell check: you mean tenet, not tenant)

I agree this is supposedly one of their tenets but it’s one they seem very idiosyncratic about. They cry non-intervention when they don’t care about something, but seem happy to call for intervention when they do. Maybe this isn’t cognitive dissonance but just having a high bar for intervention. If their bar criteria were clear, it would be easier to say so.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No country can claim to back up a two state solution while providing zero concrete measures if israel refuse to do it

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

Which they will absolutely refuse to do

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

for one thing, Saudi Arabia is bribing the US, though it's questionable whether that'd work

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Qatar bribed trump then allowed israel to bomb qatar

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

And Qatar is kinda pissed about that, to be fair. Lack of an apology (as Trump is psychologically incapable of) is not going to help either.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They are kinda pissed then what?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Shrug.

Qatar has been quite the friendly mediator though. Any pretense of Trump's ‘wins’ in the Middle East start to disappear if they simply don't do that anymore.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Israel and the usa don't want mediation they want to exterminate palestinians from palestine. I am pretty sure they would be happy if qatar stop doing it so they could day look Qatar is the one who no longer want peace and returning the hostages

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This requires Israel removing Netanyahu and his far right alliance from power, and Palestine building a stable elected government.

Netanyahu might be removed in the next election because Israelis are fed up with his military aggression that has failed to eliminate Hamas or free the remaining hostages. This is an election year.

The Palestinian authority has to be completely dismantled and rebuilt with new elections and authority to properly govern. Abbas is about to enter the 21st year of his 4 year term.

[–] Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

He was removed in 2022 and barely got back in the last election (Current gov was elected with 49.5% of the voters). Plus for the last 2 years, the polls show the gov parties don't have nearly enough support to get reelected.
Problem is there's a high chance they'll interfere with the elections.

And this will have to come with some measures or support for deradicalized education and support for joint Palestinian-Israeli organizations that bring people together like Standing Together, Combatants for Peace, etc.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 23 points 2 weeks ago

IIRC, the UN has held this same vote (with the same result) on a regular basis for decades. This isn’t a new development.

[–] CouldBeBetter@piefed.social 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There is already a two state solution. It’s what is happening currently and Israel has systematically chipped away at it for 75 years. They will not stop until they have erased any possibility of a Palestinian state. The solution is one state where everyone has equal rights.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

They have been trying the same shit with Serbia and Albania. Instead of letting us agree on anything, they encourage Albanians to lash out because "we are the bad guys". We could split Kosovo on the Serbian inhabited side and Albanian. But nooo, they feel entitled to an ethnic cleansing, as if that's how it's supposed to work.

We could wipe them off the map before the UN could even react.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think either side wants that tbh

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Two Palestines seems like a lot, but okay

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I used to say shit like this out of protest, but people took be literally and villainized me. Glad people recognize a parody nowadays.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I am ashkenazi jewish and i think if the "israelis" want to stay in the holy land, they should be given palestinian citizenship and learn to live alongside their literal cousins. Modern israel is a settler colonial project propped up by the american military industrial compelx and as such will never be an equitable solution.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago

I just realized this is uplifting news. Of all the things, who is this delusional to think this is actually good news? They are just mucking around and doing nothing. The UN is dead in my eyes.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The holy land is a myth. We are literally killing people over a 2000 year old myth, it is maddening that in modern society we act like we know what the fuck was going on 2000 years ago and someone somewhere owns it bcz a fucking book says so.. Hell, we dont know what was going on 50 years ago.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is holy in the same sense that indigenous lands are sacred. And yet there the zionists go, slaughtering the indigenous. Its almost like it was based on Manifest Destiny (it was)

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Only this time the irony is lost on the dickwads doing it. A generation ago their grandparents and parents were the ones getting murdered just for existing. Survivors of the holocaust would be ashamed of their behavior.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago

Great! I'm sure all 0 living Palestinians remaining will be glad to hear that...

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

L. One state solution or nothing. These fucking fools

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Minus the Golan heights, and sure.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Only if its truely secular

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

There’s basically no way two-state will work anymore, right?

Maybe a few decades ago. But even if Bibi was magically removed for the most pro-Palestine government possible, Israel's war crimes were recognized, and Palestine was rebuilt from rubble with massive aid, it feels like things are ‘written into a corner’ and there is just too much radicalization and spilled blood for two hypothetical states to leave each other alone.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And being under the same state will remove that tension?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No.

I’m not really sure what a good solution is anymore. We hold Israel severely accountable (which is apparently impossible :/), but then what?

[–] homura1650@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The most plausible path forward I see is the Native American model from the USA.

  1. Genocide and ethnically cleanse the target population into progressively smaller reservations. (Israel is here)

  2. Sign treaties recognizing the target population as a sovereign entity existing within the borders and legal framework of the parent nation.

  3. targeted population demilitarized. It's people become increasingly integrated into the parent nation.

  4. Civil rights movement for members of the targeted population within the parent nation.

  5. Develop an esoteric field of law clarifying what "sovereign entity existing within the borders and legal framework of the parent nation" even means.

  6. Gradually chip away at the targeted population through a combination of progressively narrowing the scope of law covered in (5), and the natural integration of the targeted population into the host population (US is here)

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 2 points 2 weeks ago

Are the Palestinians at least going to get some casinos in a couple hundred years?

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As long as any Palestinian lives, a two-state solution is possible. We need to support the downfall of fascism, and that must occur by support of Palestina and the downfall of oligarchs.

so if you recognise a two state solution then you recognise palestine's right to defend itself, right? - padme

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

So the UN is gonna execute Netanyahu and his entire cabinet? And oversee the Israli government for the foreseeable future until the state of Palestine is restored and armed equally with Isreal?

That's what's required to make this right

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's so surreal this is referred to as the New York Declaration but the US votes against it. I'm sure there's history there, but I just see the irony on the surface.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

Semi-serious alternative. Weird and crazy. China Mieville's The City & the City.. Could it work here?