Disney should just ignore this and use their “refusal to air” as leverage to dump Sinclair and find other affiliates.
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
134 points (97.9% liked)
News
32597 readers
2544 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They might, unironically. Corporations do not care about other corporations and if one is in the way between them and a pile of money, shi about to get real
They also care about the other large piles of money from other shows on Sinclair stations. And there are a lot of those.
Here's a list of all Sinclair stations by city, in case you have one in your city and want to write a letter: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stations_owned_or_operated_by_Sinclair_Broadcast_Group
It would help if people would boycott their local Sinclair/Nextstar channels and advertisers and let them know why on review sites.
ABC should withhold the rest of their programming if the Sinclair affiliates continue to do this.
I must have an extremely distorted sense of how many people still watch broadcast television seeing that Sinclair is still, apparently, relevant.
I would have guessed this would have done more harm to their market and teaching them to seek out alternatives and break their habits.
I convinced my boomer parents to finally cut cable TV in favor of Netflix, but also helped them set up OTA antennas for "news" and "sports."
Now they watch almost entirely OTA TV and barely any streaming. womp, womp.
Every time I go over there they're just mindlessly absorbing advertisements and other propaganda like it's nothing. I can't stand it.
To be fair, I use broadcast OTA and I have an antenna on my roof. It saves money, and I get to watch most of the shows I watch. It also cut down on my streaming bill. I ended up writing some emails to two of my local stations describing my feelings about capitulating to the adminstration, as well as, my feelings on the Nexstar Tegna merger. I advocated for the disbandment of the ownership and shift toward local. One actually reached back out and said they were going to shop for a local business/person to buy their station. Funnily enough, it was the Sinclair station.
Same here, and Sinclair made it a point to buy up local news. Since the Sinclair purchase, the most reputable seattle new station has turned into absolute trash.
I must have an extremely distorted sense of how many people still watch broadcast television seeing that Sinclair is still, apparently, relevant.
There's a big age gap, but also a wealth gap. Our inability (refusal) to extend broadband to rural areas and make it a basic utility rather than a luxury means you still have large chunks of the country that get all their media through the cartelized broadcast racket.
I watch broadcast TV at night. I actually rewatched The Office a few times with it.
There are perhaps dozens of us.
I guess it makes sense reruns are still a thing. It’s been so long since I’ve watched OTA TV it would probably be a surreal experience.
You can definitely tell now, especially looking at the length and content of commercials, that they know their primary audience is mostly old people having the TV on for company.
This shows those boycotts worked. When they made this choice, they weren’t expecting this backlash. Keep it up. Make these corporations suffer for capitulating to dorky Donald dictator.
Bold move Sinclair. Oh well, you’ll just continue to lose. Local stations about to get cheap to buy.
I don't think they're selling, is the problem. Sinclair can absorb loses out of spite for a very long time
It will end up like the radio. All the stations that broadcast will just play stuff about Jesus. Some cities are worse than others for this. Jacksonville is the worst. All Jesus all the time
Disney needs to close this franchise and give it to others.
Makes sense. They want to make money. Getting fucked by the FCC would do the opposite of that. Losing some viewers is better than losing all viewers.
E: For maximizing profit in the context they operate. Not for the benefit of society.
Capitulation 101
Yes. Expecting anything but a cost-benefit analysis that maximizes profit in the given conditions is all we can expect from capitalist for-profit corporations. If capitulation is the more profitable route, most of them would take it.
For-profit corporations managed to create this veneer of taking a stand on social issues during the last 15 years and many of us fell for it to some degree. So when the mask started falling off over the last little while it was somewhat surprising. But it shouldn't be.