this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
427 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25936 readers
1898 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] forrcaho@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The Republicans are absolutely committed to the lie that the shutdown is because the Democrats are demanding the government pay for illegal aliens' health care. It doesn't matter how many times they get corrected; they'll just keep repeating it.

It's an interesting experiment in just how brazen a lie they'll be able to get away with. I'm hoping this is the one that finally breaks them, and they lose credibility for good, but the right-wing media bubble is sewn up pretty tight, and so far it seems they'll believe pretty much anything they're fed.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 130 points 4 days ago (3 children)

They literally control all the government. And they still couldn't govern.

If the roles were reversed, I can't even imagine the right wing media backlash.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 days ago

The same thing happened in term 1. They controlled everything, still shut down the government on themselves, proving for the 137th time that decade that they are incapable of governing as they can't even agree amongst themselves, lost a shit ton of GDP in the process, and somehow people still think they're the fiscally conservative party.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago

The right wing media backlash would make wearing a tan suit look like a friendly Thanksgiving dinner, judging by the fact that there's any pushback at all right now.

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Republicans shut down the government during the Obama years too.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wyoming has the same number of Senate seats as California.

[–] derry@midwest.social 4 points 3 days ago

And South Dakota!!!

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Universal healthcare when?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Obama had a 60-40 Senate for a few months, and the best he could do was the ACA since insurance lobbyists didn't want to lose their jobs. We're never getting universal healthcare.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree, I don't think politicians will spearhead the change, it needs to come from labor and student unions pushing for widespread strikes. The reason I think May 1st 2028 is the best target is because of unions coordinating the expiration of labor contacts for that date, because Taft-Hartley basically outlaws coordinating strikes between unions.

https://may1.uaw.org/

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago

February 31st.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

All of my coworkers believe that this shutdown is 100% the democrats fault and it’s because they wanna give illegal immigrants healthcare and allow trans athletes to compete in the Olympics. You can fix dumb or brainwashed.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 60 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Collins pointed out that this was impossible. “It’s against federal law for people who are here illegally to get health care,” she said.

I really dislike how 'health care' has become a synonym for 'health insurance policy coverage'. And even so this is still a ridiculous statement in its own right.

[–] JollyBrancher@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

Like it's not already difficult for people here in the U.S.A. to afford. As a vast majority of anything else the ACA adjustment would never trickle down, but it sure as hell will boulder/snowball down. And that's on top of the Medicaid/Medicare cuts.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 90 points 4 days ago

Woof, when Laura Ingraham is to the left of you on an issue, you are way into la la land.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 52 points 4 days ago (6 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago

Only if you're actually a Christian.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 60 points 4 days ago

I thought this was the Trump shutdown, but no it really is the Johnson / Trump / GOP shutdown.

And really when article said he "snapped" I was hoping for something at least mildly traumatic. Or even like snapped to attention, in realization that he was completely in the wrong. sadly, no.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I can't wait to find out what Trump / Putin has been blackmailing this choad with.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 12 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Rumor has it he has a Grindr account

[–] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

LOL. So?

All MAGA men have Grindr accounts. They crash Grindr whenever they all meet in the same town.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] url@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Separately, that choadster has lasted waaaaay longer than I originally thought he would.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Mike Johnson needs to be slapped in the face with a cock untill he publically admits he likes it, and has in fact liked that for a long, long time already.

Release the Grindr profile.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Did that not drop yet? It was due yesterday?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So the update on the guy who threatened to release the Grindr profile of Mike Johnson:

He has been threatened and intimidated via online communications, he has lawyered up, he sent what he had to a journalism outlet to be vetted and potentially published, his lawyers have advised him to make no further claims publically, his original video was removed by TikTok...

... and he has fled his home and the state he is originally from, and reports that he can see people he doesn't know traipsing around his property via his remotely accesible home security cams.

Soooo... yeahhh....

Oh right and because his line of work was somewhere between comedian and actor, he can longer work, as... nobody will touch him.

God Bless America, Let Freedom Ring.

EDIT:

https://www.pride.com/culture/mike-johnson-grindr

I'd say this is a fair summary of what has occurred.

Also, hilariously, knowyourmeme also has a decent summary of what has occured, with links to the now removed video.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/mike-johnson-grindr-leak-rumor-from-tiktoker-razzledazzlemo

His gofundme for his legal defense fund.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/fund-razzledazzlemos-legal-defense

Also, ... basically any Tiktokker who has shared that original (now removed by Tiktok) video from razzledazzlemo is getting the Tiktok moderation team cracking down on them, Tiktok is actively suppressing this.

You can probably thank Larry Ellison for that.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He's worried about that Grindr profile leaking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And now half of the VA is shut down. Fuck these obstructionist Republicans

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Let's face it, the VA was on the chopping block already thanks to Trump tightening the purse strings. There is quite literally no reason to even accept a deal that gets the ACA funded again, because Trump can just say 'no' and choke it off anyways.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I guess I'm a sucker and a loser. Fuck i hate that guy and this admin

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

tightening the purse strings

Is that really the right phrase to use here? If I took all my family vacation money and spent it on ninja swords from the mall, I don't think my wife would say, "We can't go on vacation because my husband is tightening the purse strings."

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Damn.

Guess my vet apartment neighbor with the necrotic leg from a freak infrection of a flesh-eating virus...

... will not be getting that scheduled amputation and prosthetic.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Republicans can pass this if their reps all vote together, they can't even get all the Republicans to support them anymore.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don’t believe they can. They need 60 votes in the Senate.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

Except when they used reconciliation to pass 2 budget bills in 2021 when Biden became president, and 2 in 2017 when Trump became president. They use reconciliation to bypass the filibuster after 20 hours thereby allowing just 51 votes to pass budgetary measures.. so long as no extraneous non budgetary items are added to it, those individually would need 60 and be filed separately at that point.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I may be wrong, but I believe you're talking about two different types of legislation that have different rules.

The Republicans have the votes for a simple majority, but I don't think this bill counts as a reconciliation and would require new changes to the senate's rules (which may or may not be possible).

I could be wrong, but if I was, why haven't they just pushed it forward?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Sure but the point is that these asshole Republicans don't want to use the reconciliation process because then they can't say, well the Demoncrats voted for it so it's all their fault you uneducated white people don't have "affordable" healthcare and why your white racist Charlie Kirk Grandma had no Medicare/Medicaid and got kicked out of her nursing home that their Obese Oligarchy Bill said to do.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Isn’t that the guy that has the masturbation app with his son?

[–] JollyBrancher@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago

Ain't masturbation if it's with another man. Checkmate.

load more comments
view more: next ›