this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
401 points (99.3% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

1098 readers
9 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world

!antifascism@midwest.social

!politicus@kbin.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Incredible how >80% of Republicans support the release but only 4 R legislators signed the discharge petition. Shoes how little the GOP Congress cares about their constituents

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

That's because they know what's in the files, and it's trump. And they don't want their constituents to know that. Because that's too big for them to cover up.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But also how little Republicans actually care about what their legislators do.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"but... The little R next to his name means he's on my side" - Most Republicans

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

They are simple creatures

I don't know. I would vote Democrat if I lived in the US but they would constantly vote against my preferences on more than just one issue.

In politics you always have to vote for the one that is closest to you or you help the ones farther from you.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Why would they? They get reelected whether they do what their constituents want or not. They vote R no matter what and the RNC generally ensures there is little to no competition.

This is something the Dems recently started trying to copy at the same level after seeing how well it can be blatantly implemented.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow MAGA Republicans are in a different category than just "Republicans" in the news now.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

What's the difference between MAGA Republicans and Republicans?

Nothing. They vote the same way.

[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

  • Regardless of whether a small minority or a large majority of American citizens support a policy, the probability of policy change is nearly the same — approximately 30%.
  • A proposed policy change with low support among economically elite Americans is adopted only about 18% of the time, while a proposed change with high support is adopted about 45% of the time.
  • Interest groups have a substantial impact on public policy. When mass-based and business-oriented interest groups oppose a policy, the probability of its being enacted is only 16%, rising to 47% when they’re strongly favorable. “On the 1,357 proposed policy changes for which at least one interest group was coded as favoring or opposing change, in only 36% of the cases did most groups favor change, while in 55% of the cases most groups opposed change.”
  • Overall, business-oriented groups have almost twice the influence of mass-based groups.
  • While the popular belief is that professional associations and interest groups serve to aggregate and organize average citizens’ interests, the data do not support this. The preferences of average citizens are positively and highly correlated with the preferences of economic elites but not with those of interest groups. Except for labor unions and the AARP, interest groups do not tend to favor the same policies as average citizens. In fact, some groups’ positions are negatively correlated with the opinion of the average American, as in the case of gun owners.

Sources

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Who the fuck are those remaining people?!

If you're not in the Epstein files I see no reason why you should oppose to their release unless you are a complete fucking psychopath.

I guess Cruz' point that Americans need to stop attacking pedophiles found its base.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

It's the ones that have hitched their wagon to someone definitely in the Epstein files

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Mostly state and federal representatives and other pedophiles.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I can think of at least one that doesn't.

[–] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago