this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
598 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

17015 readers
2320 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The bottom assumes the sun moved between the earth and the moon, but what if the moon just moved to be on the other side of the sun? πŸ€”

My first thought is that the tides would disappear. I'm sure that would fuck up things somehow.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 6 days ago

Mercury and Venus: Are we a joke to you?

Dude... science impresses me constantly

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago

Tic-tac-toe - Moon wins!

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think if the last one was a result of the sun not getting closer but the moon getting farther, we'd be okay right?

Like I know it wouldn't great for certain things.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd find it hard to believe anything could happen that would cause the moon to be thrown out of it's orbit enough to end up on the far side of the sun, but leave earth unaffected.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The moon is slowly migrating away from the earth into higher orbits (due to the earth spinning faster than the Moon's orbit), eventually it could escape with a gravity assist from Mars or Venus. It'll have tidal consequences for Earth, but not like catastrophic (though I suspect it might allow the earth's core to cool a bit faster, which could be the beginning of the end of life on earth).

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But how many millions of years is that?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It is lots of them.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why would impact the core?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Friction heat from tidal forces.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe once we start trying to settle it, it’ll look at Earth and say β€œnope”

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah sure who needs tides?

In fact, theres a chance that the climate catastrophe from destroying the moon would offset the effects of anthropogenic climate change. Not a very good chance, like 0.00000001%, but still better than everything else we're doing.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

A moonless earth would still have tides, they'd just be much smaller.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wouldn’t the lack of tides result in the ocean getting pretty stagnant, deoxygenating, and most ocean life dying except for microbes and plankton, which would then affect the atmosphere and pretty much kill our current biome?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago

I don’t think so… why would that happen?

Well when you put it like THAT, I guess yeeting the moon DOES sound like perhaps not the best idea ever..

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Fuck it, let's try it.

Kobe!

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago

In a quizz show, one question was "which planet is between sun and moon during lunar eclipse?" and I love this framing so much

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

It's either the apocalypse or really good acid