this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
787 points (88.6% liked)

Comic Strips

19574 readers
1313 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

My distro is downstream of arch, there's always an update. I just install them when I feel like it

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 46 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

An update for this comic is available:

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 26 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

The Mac one could be a lot more realistic:

"Mac OS Yellowstone is available for your Mac, and will update tonight."

"Mac OS did not update last night because you left some windows open."

"Mac OS will update tonight, but you must enter your fingerprint and password to make it happen."

"Mac OS did not update last night because you didn't enter your password again at 2AM and we weren't sure if you really meant it"

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

"Mac OS did not update last night because the vibes were off."

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You're right; also realistic would be the Mac user who simply refuses to reboot their Mac at any time ever.

[–] originaltnavn@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Of course! What would be the use for a machine that could only work when I am also in the office?

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Depends on distro, snapshotting and if it's a immutable distro.

Though Windows users should be worrying more, they don't have backups and have silently activated bitlocker but ignorance of that is bliss.

Mac user don't have to worry in my experience.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 13 points 20 hours ago

Me, a Debian user: "Wow, been 5 years already? Cool beans"

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Linux update is more like… “uh oh, please don’t break anything, I just got my graphics drivers working last week.”

This take is based on a true story.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That is the same with nvidia drivers on windows nowadays. They keep pushing updates that just break shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Avenging5@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Maybe this meme is from the times they weren't?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 212 points 1 day ago (44 children)

macOS updates haven't cost money since 2009

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (9 children)

But... They did?! (Never had a mac)

[–] gianni@lemmy.ca 102 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, major OS releases used to cost money for a license. The same way a Windows 11 license costs money. Apple stopped charging for OS releases but Microsoft still does.

[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

But Lemmy assured me that Apple is BAD!

[–] Twipped@l.twipped.social 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

MacOS never had licenses, owning a mac was the license because you couldn't run it on non-apple hardware* until they switched to Intel. I got OS8 from a copy of MacAddict.

* not counting Gil Amelio's ill-fated hardware mac clone program

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have a vague memory of spending $30 for an upgrade to MacOS more than a decade ago. Then Apple stopped charging for them. So, this comic is pretty off base, but people love to bitch, so what can you do.

[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, the last time they charged was Snow Leopard in 2009. Everything has all been free since. Snow Leopard was really a dream to use, though. If paying $30 would get us back to that kind of luxury, I would gladly pay for the privilege.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every 10.x version of OS X cost money up through 10.6, just like how every version of Windows has cost money unless you use one of the keygens Microsoft doesn't care about.

[–] Twipped@l.twipped.social 2 points 18 hours ago

7.1 was the first MacOS that apple charged for, nominally to cover the cost of the CDs. 7.1, 7.5 and 7.6 all cost $29, but you could get free installers from many of the Mac magazines.

8.0, 8.5 and 9.0 were $99

10.0 was $129

10.1 was free, but a lot of stores charged a handling fee. I remember picking up my copy from CompUSA for ten cents.

10.2 - 10.5 were $130 upgrades, but there were numerous ways to get it for free. I don't think I ever actually paid for any of them.

10.6 and 10.7 were both $30

10.8 was $20

10.9 and later were all free

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (43 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Also Linux: oh good. Maybe it’ll fix this issue so I don’t have to lol

[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Android apps:

The free features are now removed. Watch a video before you can send texts for a week.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago

Similar - this free app has now been acquired by a Chinese conglomerate and will soon have micro transactions and tracking added. Also for some reason it needs all permissions now to even function.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

TBH, I say "Not again!" on Linux if it's a kernel update, because it means I'll have to reboot.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago

Sounds like Arch that seems to me to update the kernel every week.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

I say "Not again" on Linux too if it's a kernel update because anything newer than 6.10 means that sleep is broken again and I have to roll back to 6.10.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Huh, never had to pay for a Mac update.

[–] AWTM_James@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

That's because Apple hasn't charged for OSX/MacOS updates since 2013 with OSX 10.9

Edit: I also don't think they were ever $99. I upgraded from 10.5 to 10.6 back in 2009 and I think it was only like $30, and they had to ship me a disc with the update so it's not like they didn't have any overhead they had to pay for

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They were more expensive in the early 2000s.

See, for example, this MacRumors thread from 2003 entitled “Mac OS X 10.3 Panther. Why Is it still $129?

Jaguar (10.2) was also $129 in 2002.

10.1 was free.

Going up from 2003,

  • 10.4 Tiger was $129 in 2005
  • 10.5 Leopard was $129 in 2007
  • 10.6 Snow Leopard was $29 in 2009
  • 10.7 Lion was $29 in 2011
  • 10.8 Mountain Lion was $29 in 2012
  • 10.9 Mavericks was a free update in 2013
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

MacOS updates don't cost money. They're also completely optional (even security updates) and major OS versions introduce new features.

[–] eah@programming.dev 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The comic is from 2011. The upgrade to OS X Lion, released that year, was paid originally and then made available for free.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The current mainline kernel hangs on my laptop when the system goes to screen off idle.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›