this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
277 points (98.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43866 readers
602 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 12 points 1 day ago
[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sugar: THE BITTER TRUTH

https://youtu.be/dBnniua6-oM

Robert H. Lustig, MD, UCSF Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology, explores the damage caused by sugary foods. He argues that fructose (too much) and fiber (not enough) appear to be cornerstones of the obesity epidemic through their effects on insulin. Recorded on 05/26/2009.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 day ago

He is so well spoken, and his work is very impactful!

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 28 points 2 days ago

People have spoken a lot about how digestible the sugars are, but in terms of overall healthiness, the fibre is an important component even beyond its impact on sugar absorption. Many people do not get enough fibre in their diets.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are they? Depends how many you eat.

[–] crypt0cler1c 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You think this obese monkey was eating raspberries? They probably got into a human garbage. Get real.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Do you think being fat didn't happen to any humans or animals before the invention of processed food?

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 125 points 2 days ago (2 children)

RN here, it's because your body has a more difficult time accessing the sugars in fruit form. They are wrapped up in multiple types of fiber which add bulk to your digestive system and serve as kind of a shield for your body to less easily access the sugar. The juice is essentially just the sugar with all the fiber strained out, has others have said this causes a situation where you can drink the calories from like 18 oranges in 45 seconds, and your body can access it immediately and easily. This is also why whole fruit is actually a good thing for diabetics because the glycemic index is actually pretty low.

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Some years ago some medication I was on put me at risk for diabetes (not an issue now), and my Dr. at the time mentioned the benefit of fruit, however I never really asked them to elaborate.
Thanks for that explanation, it makes a lot of sense the way you've described the function. You learn something new everyday!

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 20 points 2 days ago

Flavonoids and polyphenols. Cleveland Health has articles on both.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 79 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There was some guy on telly did a test. Half the group had to eat oranges. The other half had to drink orange juice. Then swapped them over the next day. I can't remember the exact setup but i think it was like 'eat/drink as much as you want, stop when you feel full'.

Everyone was able to consume far, far more calories in juice form and probably far more sugar than they needed.

I think like even eating enough oranges for 1x300ml glass was hard for many people to do in fruit form. Basically, the rest of the orange filled them up and that's what we're better evolved for: slower digestion of a more varied mush and lots of fibre and stuff like that.

The juice is far too easy for us to eat way more than needed.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Juice being bad doesn’t necessarily make the whole fruit good. The glycemic index still has to be considered in the context of the person and their diet.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're just another shill for big juice, Pulptastic.

/s in case it's not obvious

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

Sorry, to clear it up I’m team juice very bad fruit occasionally.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 117 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There is sugar, absolutely. And that's probably where most of the calories come from. But there is also water, cellulose (fiber), and vitamins/minerals - doesn't have much non-sugar caloric value to change that balance, but it's still important. And nobody serious is suggesting you eat only fruit, so you can get non-sugar calories from other sources and it can be balanced in the big picture.

It's kind of like an appropriate amount of dressing on a salad, the good outweighs the bad and makes you more likely to actually eat that nutrition-positive food.

Source: I'm some guy on the Internet. You can trust me.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 83 points 3 days ago (8 children)

nobody serious is suggesting you eat only fruit

[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Notorious for having lived a long life...

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

56 is long if you were born around 1901

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is it? I always thought lower life expectancies were dragged down by infant mortality. Basically if you survive the crib you'd likely live into your 70s.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I thought about that as I wrote it! I stand by what I said.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Source: I’m some guy on the Internet. You can trust me.

With the amount of AI slop out there, in this day and age this is actually a surprisingly high level of trust.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Admittedly when I wrote that I had moments like "cellulose is in fruit, right? And that's fiber?" and when I googled with neutral terms I mostly trusted Google's AI slop 🤣

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

1/2 bottle of Ranch an appropriate amount?

[–] GrilledCheese@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For the first half of the meal, yes.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Are you both from the US? It was rough getting used to how much you all like to drown out the food with various sauces

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 64 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There’s also quantity. Eating an orange is healthy. Drinking a glass of orange juice is like eating six oranges after removing the fiber: not heslthy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 3 days ago

All that sugar is bound up in fiber, making it slower to release and keeping it from spiking your blood sugar into pre-diabeetus. Grind that same fruit down (juice), destroy its fibers, and now you got diabetes in a can.

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are like 11g of augars in 100g lf berries. They are not mostly sugar

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago

Well, mostly water. But besides that, it’s mostly sugars and fiber, in that order.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Because it takes quite a lot of effort to eat a huge amount of sugar in the form on fruits and berries. They also have some vitamins, fibers and other stuff in them too.

[–] Alsjemenou@lemy.nl 22 points 2 days ago

They are not mostly sugar, sugars are just a part of the nutrients. Most fruits don't even have that much sugar in them, it varies wildly though. There is also the way these sugars are intertwined with fiber, that make it much harder for these sugars to be processed in your body. So the sugars are released over a greater period of time giving your body more time to react. as opposed to refined sugars. Fruits are always healthier than candy, cookies, or soda.

There is a lot more in fruits than just sugars, there are proteins, vitamins, minerals, fibers. Which are all necessary for a healthy body. Sugars as well are necessary for your body to function.

It is practically impossible, if you're otherwise healthy, to eat too much fruit. I personally eat at the very least 3 kilos or 5 pounds of various fruits a week. within an otherwise varied (vegan) diet. I've done so for the past 10 years. I make sure to test my blood, and so far had zero issues except low vit. d. Which you can't get from fruit.

Why is it healthy? Well, we evolved next to fruits. Our ancestors always plucked and eaten them for millions of years. Just like we've done with all kinds of plants. Our gi tract is the right length, our body cant make most vitamins itself and completely functions on sugars. Fruit is part of a varied diet.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Healthy is relative. A handful of fruit is generally fine. Eating a few pounds of grapes in a day is probably a bad choice. There's also a lot of people that conflate fruit with things that have fruit in them as about the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is it weird that I woke up this morning wondering the same exact thing? 😳

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

A bug in the matrix

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

How the sugar is packaged is also important. Standard white sugar is refined to be easier to digest - less gets pooped out. Fruits and berries sugar is (mostly) fructose with fibers and other elements. In the mouth fructose tastes equally sweet but the stomach has more troubles digesting it and converting it into usable energy. So you absorb way less and poop out way more.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Otherbarry@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A nutritionist will be better able to explain this but I'll give it a try :)

You're maybe overthinking the sugar part of the equation. Berries/fruits contain natural sugar that is a part of the fruit itself. Your body processes that differently since that sugar comes integrated with other nutrients (fiber, Vitamin C, antioxidants, etc.). And you typically won't want to eat say a few buckets of berries in one sitting to equal the same sugar high you get in a processed sugar, all that fiber will feel much heavier and your body is just going to tell you to slow down on its own.

The much worse types of sugars are added sugars e.g. sugars that were processed and now exist separately, then re-added into something else. Take your berry example, process all the sugar out of them so only the sugar exists, then you add those sugars to some other food you wanted to sweeten. Now it's a sugar without any integrated benefits (no fiber/vitamin C/antioxidants/etc/) - your body won't process this processed sugar the same way it used to when it existed as part of the fruit.. you're only getting the bad without anything useful. So you can gobble a whole ton more of those added sugars to get your sugar high without your body getting any indicators to hey, slow down, maybe it's time to stop eating these added sugars.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Whole fruits are pretty healthy in reasonable moderation

if you gorge on 3 boxes of grapes you're still gonna have smashed through over a thousand calories

The big caveat is fruit juices which remove all the fiber that makes you feel full, particularly anything concentrated.

At that point you're getting closer to a soft drink than fruit (though you'll still at least get the vitamins)

load more comments
view more: next ›