this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
310 points (99.1% liked)

politics

26000 readers
2573 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Exclusive: employees would be reimbursed for fees paid to childcare facilities under plans initiated by Ilhan Omar

Congressional Democrats are introducing a bill that would provide childcare relief to federal workers affected by the shutdown of the federal government, as it drags on through a second week.

Parents would be reimbursed for fees paid to childcare facilities during the shutdown under plans initiated by Congresswoman Ilhan Omar.

Any federal employee who has been furloughed, or remains working through the shutdown without pay, would be entitled to support under the Federal Worker Childcare Protection Act of 2025.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As a reminder of how daycare works, you pay regardless of whether your kid attends or not. You could pull them from daycare altogether... But your probably not going to find another slot or opening again.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's weird how the funding for the ICEstapo and sending National Guard into blue cities is never in question...

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Are they really still paying both of those parties? Wtf?

Edit: I'm seeing that they ARE NOT paid during the shutdown. But they are forced to work.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

There should be a carve out of this for anyone who works for DHS affiliated agencies. Those people should go broke and be financially forced into other lines of work.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And that has zero chance of passing.

[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I imagine they know that. But it's a good headline that "Republicans vote down child care"

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Republican voters are only going to hear the "Republicans bravely defend the country from COMMUNISM" spin.

[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I know... I know. The media landscape in this country is irrevocably fucked.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Yep. It will never pass because it's socialism, and we can't have that! /s

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Wtf? They are furloughed, they are home with their kids. Unless they are essential, then ok I can see it being good. But where is this support for childcare for the people that are essential and not federal workers? Why are the Dems attacking Mamdani when he said he wanted to provide childcare?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

All the essential workers still work, without pay

[–] elephantgrenades@midwest.social 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Many US child care facilities require contracts for 40 hours per week regardless if you send your kids every day. Even if the parents choose to keep their kids home, they're likely on the hook for payments.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's how ours is... And I'm just a normal dude with a toddler.

We pay them if the rascal is there or not.

[–] Nycto@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Makes sense. They are selling you the option to one of the available childcare slots, which is a fixed number. They can't sell more slots than they can accommodate, on the off chance every slot is used on a given day. To do so would drop the quality of care.

It's not like they are airlines and can just bump you to the next available.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its not even about quality of care its state regulations. They can only accept so many kids and need to have so many staff per state regs.

If I pull my kid from daycare, they are just out of daycare. They would be school age by the time I got a new slot.

[–] Nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think the state regulations exist to assure a minimum safe level quality of care, so we are saying the same thing.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

They can't sell more slots than they can accommodate, on the off chance every slot is used on a given day. To do so would drop the quality of care.

I mean, if airlines can do it...

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

I very much doubt you will find an example of Ilhan attacking Mamdani or childcare support. This is at least the second time she's tried to pass this bill, the first was during Trump's first term. A majority of federal workers are not furloughed during a shutdown, although it's hard to find numbers on how many of those are working with pay vs. without pay. I'm positive she also spoke out when Republicans and Manchin and Sinema killed the childcare tax credits from the build back better bill that reduced child poverty to record lows, she's pretty consistently one of the good ones.

It's also worth pointing out that this is as much a messaging tactic as a real bill. There ain't no way Republicans are passing this bill, but having this and other bills like it on the table makes them put up or shut up if they try to attack Democrats for holding government workers' livelihoods hostage over the shutdown. Having it focus on government workers increases the strength of that message, even if broader relief would still be necessary if this passes.

Introducing bills like this, and thus establishing a counter narrative of "this is what the Democrats want for the country, as opposed to what you are getting today from the Republicans", is miles better than the Schumer strategy to date of doing his level best to agree to all of the Republican demands in order to make living under the Trump presidency as unbearable as possible in the hopes that people will vote Democrat for change despite Schumer putting no daylight between Democratic and Republican positions.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

It costs money to take care of children, in case you weren't aware.

[–] vateso5074@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I think it's that category of essential employees who are working without pay that this would be most intended for.