this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
128 points (93.8% liked)

Science Memes

17015 readers
2259 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Seems to be worse ecologically

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's actually not. We have entire regions covered with vines. We can't wrap the whole France in plastic, it's just not possible. But we can predict where it's going to freeze and when, so we take such measures on very specific zones with precise timings. So this only happens a few times a year, at precise locations and not for long

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's an old cheap method.

We have much better ways of protecting crops from frost including reusable netting/row covers with supplemental heat from electric heaters. However they cost more so....

[–] r0ertel@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Electric heaters are wasteful. How about spending that energy wisely while also generating heat?

https://fedia.io/m/nottheonion@lemmy.world/t/2828343

(Sorry for the full link, I can't figure out how to reference an article on another instance on the mobile app.)

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 87 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

This is only done when there's an unexpected frost in spring or summer when the poly tunnels have been taken away.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 24 points 1 day ago

Oil in plastic from: bad, icky, kills turtles

Oil in fire form: good, warming, organic

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

fighting climate change by burning petroleum! Yay

[–] CucumberFetish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago

They are fighting not only the symptoms, but also the root cause

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Seeing as we don't fully understand the effects of micro plastics, it might not be.

I'm still convinced that micro plastics will be the final nail in humanity's coffin, not climate change.

[–] somethingp@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think worrying about something that's an unknown risk while ignoring the very real known risk is somewhat illogical. Especially since I'd imagine there are more than 2 possible solutions for a problem like this. Also this assumes that the produce wouldn't end up being packaged in some form of plastic at some point before arriving to the consumer anyway.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Humans have had several generations of exposure to microplastics. Other closely related mammals like rats have had potentially a hundred generations. One of the reasons plastics are so successful in so many applications is that they are chemically extremely inert. I'm not saying there will be no problems, but if there was going to be a catastrophe, I think you would be able to point to signs by now.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Oh nooo... Not the fertility. We definitely aren't an overpopulated species putting extreme strain on all our environments and the planet as a whole. How can we get by if some, not all, breeders can't fulfill their animalistic urge to have shitty kids?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And that's why I think they'll be the nail in our coffin.

Humanity can survive climate change; adapting to our environment is one of the reasons we're the dominant life form.

Obviously this isn't saying that climate change is good, but humans have made it through a bottle neck before. But you can't survive a bottle neck if you can't make more people.

Plus, the environment would recover when most of humanity is wiped out. Plastics are here for the next few hundred years at least.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Don't threaten me with a good time; human infertility is a good thing. But if we are affected, it's likely others are as well.

Too many people anyway

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

humanity’s

idiocracy but plastics based - yep.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In Germany frost is combated by spraying vines with mist. Freezing water releases heat, which raises the temperature by a few degrees.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

In one of the Laura Ingalls books they run around pouring water on top of their crop early in the morning when it turns out it's frozen. It seems to be an old method.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

don't you only see these being used when other preferable infrastructure has already failed, and it's like, an emergency or something?

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s exactly why this is done. It’s an emergency operation if there is a sudden freeze that would kill the vines.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

A sudden freeze will not kill the vines. Grapes are extremely tough. It can hurt the flower buds though. A severe enough freeze can cut the yield.

For wine grapes less fruit in the bunches = lower quality wine.