this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
362 points (98.9% liked)

Traditional Art

5930 readers
682 users here now

From dabblers to masters, obscure to popular and ancient to futuristic, this is an inclusive community dedicated to showcasing all types of art by all kinds of artists, as long as they're made in a traditional medium

'Traditional' here means 'Physical', as in artworks which are NON-DIGITAL in nature.

What's allowed: Acrylic, Pastel, Encaustic, Gouache, Oil and Watercolor Paintings; Ink Illustrations; Manga Panels; Pencil and Charcoal sketches; Collages; Etchings; Lithographs; Wood Prints; Pottery; Ceramics; Metal, Wire and paper sculptures; Tapestry; weaving; Qulting; Wood carvings, Armor Crafting and more.

What's not allowed: Digital art (anything made with Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Krita, Blender, GIMP or other art programs) or AI art (anything made with Stable Diffusion, Midjourney or other models)


make sure to check the rules stickied to the top of the community before posting.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Screenshot_20251012-030700_SubstackScreenshot_20251012-030648_SubstackScreenshot_20251012-030717_Substack

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 73 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

My favourite is the guy who makes sculptures of pillows out of marble .... imagine leaning back to rest your head on one of these things

https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2020/01/marble-pillows-by-hakon-anton-fageras/

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I love the skill. But beyond doing it once I don't get the artistic desire.

Dont you want to do smth interesting instead?

[–] Nima@leminal.space 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think its interesting. and I love that they chose an every day object.

just because its not a scantily clad lady doesn't make the sculpture uninteresting. and art doesn't need to be busy to make you feel.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

The pillow as subject seems to promise intimacy or rest, yet here it is only an idea of softness — neither emotionally nor materially transformed. Nothing is being done with it.

One of the techinal aspects of sculpture is the artist’s interaction with material — how stone becomes flesh, how metal can suggest pliancy, or how touch is rendered visible. In the case of a pillow sculpture, there’s a lost opportunity to explore tactility, resistance, and transformation. Mg point is that the work’s fragility reads as a lack of engagement. The material doesn’t invite exploration; it simply claims fragility to be content. In sculptural traditions texture embodies experience — the compression of skin, the fold of cloth — this piece stops at the surface. The aesthetic effect is there but the content is lacking.

In sculpting the body, artists are always bound by a system of proportions, expectations, and recognitions — what a body should be. A pillow, by contrast, belongs to the infinite: every crease or fold can be justified (although I don't doubt his technical mastery). The pillow permits indifference for the artist, whatever is fine, there is no perfection to aim for. And this might sound like I dislike minimalist or abstract art, I dont, its some if my absolute favourite.

The pillow’s surface suggests softness, but without a counterforce, softness remains pointless. In great sculpture, touch is relational — pressure against pressure. Here, there is no resistance, no gesture, no human tension. Softness without subject.

OK there is a fold at best.

Minimalism demands restraint, but without content it is empty. There is a lack of tension or narrative.

The pillow is inherently charged with intimacy — it bears the body as its purpose. Again on its own, it is made sterile.

Any depth to the idea is forced.

I could argue for it, claiming the point is to show the existence of smth that is created for humans without any humanity. The fold shows the effect of a human but with no human there. We're focusing on absence. But the sculpture isnt forcing this thought, I'm bringing everything into this myself.

just because its not a scantily clad lady doesn't make the sculpture uninteresting. and art doesn't need to be busy to make you feel.

Very disappointed thats what you think I'm asking for.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

You write a lot here just to deny the artist the freedom to iterate on and perfect an idea. Just the fact that it's difficult to make a realistic pillow out of stone seems to me to be an interesting premise. Let them be. It clearly interests them, and me too. I'd love to see a gallery full of those pillows.

[–] Nima@leminal.space 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The pillow's meaning as the subject is for the artist to know and the person taking in the art to interpret based on their own lens of the world. your interpretation isn't invalid, but it doesn't invalidate any other's interpretation either.

does art need to adhere to all these rules you've said? or are these simply your interpretations of the art.

you seem like bodies carved into marble and I think that's wonderful. but it doesn't mean marble should be only for that type of subject.

-"The pillow’s surface suggests softness, but without a counterforce, softness remains pointless. In great sculpture, touch is relational — pressure against pressure. Here, there is no resistance, no gesture, no human tension. Softness without subject."

that's an interesting point for sure, but I think aesthetic and warmth can come from the strangest examples. and I'd love to have one of these pillows because I find them interesting to look at. I also love the material choice for the pieces.

knowledge about form and material and lighting and what materials do and don't do is wonderful. but none of it is needed to truly appreciate something.

-"The pillow is inherently charged with intimacy — it bears the body as its purpose. Again on its own, it is made sterile.

Any depth to the idea is forced."

oh god I don't get intimacy from this at all. it seems that we just view this differently. and that is how it's all meant to be!

-"Very disappointed thats what you think I'm asking for."

I just meant that it doesn't have to fit your view of the medium of choice and subject to be 'good'.

also... do keep in mind this is on a meme post about thirst traps and images taken of marble sculptures from underbelly angles to make them appear sexy. lol

doesn't have to be so heavy and serious all the time. the point of it is to make you feel.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Maybe he's an autistic artist & has a hyperfixated fascination with uncomfortable pillows.

marble is best for expressing the nuances of emotion. “Because of the material qualities of marble itself, it appears fragile. It’s quite fragile, but it’s not that fragile, and yet it appears so because of the translucency and pureness of the stone.” He added that it allows for sculpting at a very precise level, but that he tries “not to be too literal about it. I think that my main focus is to create an atmosphere, a sensation, more than a literal representation of something that expresses, for instance, fragility.”

I do like that. But again, one and done. Move on, explore that fragility in different ways.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If not thirst trap, why thirst trap shaped?

Its called modesty. How could it possibly a thirst trap if it's called modesty??

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

There must be urns somewhere adjacent. If there's urns, you can tell it's art.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

They had no damn power tools! We just dont have experts in the craft anymore. Everytime I see a new stone carving it's horrible. (I'm sure theres still good work being done)

But its odd how far our skill has fallen despite better tools and material.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The market for ornate marble full body funeral shrouds has fallen significantly

There is atleast one client awaiting. 🙋‍♂️

(Only issue is finances involved but let's not worry about that for now)

[–] Shrubbery@piefed.social 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm trying not to get excited about that price tag, because for all I know that artist is very famous and took him years to make.

Sometimes I visit the Christie website and think, hmmm that could be affordable. Think of it as an investment lol.

Never fallen to temptation yet.

Oh that is good stuff. Thanks

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

No one is paying prices calculated on inflation for that kind of work

[–] bier@feddit.nl 8 points 3 days ago

This is art I can get behind.

Modesty - Antonio Corradini (1752)

Undine Rising From the Waters - Chauncey Bradley Ives (1880)

The Veiled Vestal - Raffaele Monti (1847)

Veiled Christ - Giuseppe Sanmartino (1753)

Name of the 4 pieces in order.

[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

I call bullshit on it not being a thirst trap. Look at her fucking hips. You've just awoken something in at least a couple people.

[–] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago

This is NOT a thirst trap. I pinky promise

It is now

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 12 points 4 days ago

what these dudes totally wanted to fuck their art, it was part of the movement

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago

First one I believe is Undine Rising From The Waters (1880) By Chauncey Bradley Ives⁣. Third I think is by Raffaelle Monti.

Feel free to fact check, and/or search up the other two...

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Apparently everyone knows what a thirst trap is besides me.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A picture published with the intent to attract oglers.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Thanks, that makes sense

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

We have a non-gooner among us

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Ceci n’est pas une thirst fap

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

there's traces of semen on at least one of these.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

All I know is there's deffo some on my pillow!!