this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
756 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

13776 readers
838 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] plyth@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Can the roughly 1000 people per minute board the metro in a minute?

Or rather, since there are 2 metros in 9m, and traffic in all directions, can 500 people board a metro in a minute if another 500 people have to unboard first, or just 100 if not everybody uses the same stop?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 weeks ago

Have you ridden trains? Like, commuter trains? the NYC subway handles millions of riders per day. The trains have many doors.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not a problem. Stations where a lot of people board and unboard at the same time have sometimes platform where one side is for boarding, and the other for unboarding. Plus, trains can have more doors per car.

[–] Teepo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, these kinds of transfer numbers are easily possible (even though other posters have said you don't actually have 1,000 getting on or off at one stop). As an example, consider the subway of Toronto, Canada on its busiest line, Line 1. A subway train is 138m (450 ft) long with 6 cars (though there is no internal barrier between cars) and a capacity of about 1,500 people. Each car has 4 door sets per side, and these door sets are about 1.5m (5 ft) wide. People can easily fit through them in pairs, so moving 4 or more people per door set when in a rush is very doable. With 24 door sets (only one side opens at a station), that's 96 people entering or exiting per second, so 10 or 11 seconds for 1,000 people. If you think 4 per second per door is too optimistic, then it's 1,000 people in 20 seconds.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

a 175m wide road would be well over 35 lanes of car traffic, closer to 58. Not 7.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

id wager that in toronto, you could build all the subways and LRT and trains, and the road traffic would stay the same. people don't look at cars just for convince, its a cultural thing in north America, that your life is sorted out, like having a house, a good job, savings/retirement fund. people look and treat you weird if you don't have a car or can't drive (ask me how i know that)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's a wide track...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›