this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
353 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

18652 readers
1152 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Crosspost

The U.S. Coast Guard will no longer classify the swastika — an emblem of fascism and white supremacy inextricably linked to the murder of millions of Jews and the deaths of more than 400,000 U.S. troops who died fighting in World War II — as a hate symbol, according to a new policy that takes effect next month.

Instead, the Coast Guard will classify the Nazi-era insignia as “potentially divisive” under its new guidelines. The new policy, set to take effect Dec. 15, similarly downgrades the definition of nooses and the Confederate flag, though display of the latter remains banned, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

But rainbows and watermelon slices are, I assume?

[–] KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 98 points 13 hours ago

Sounds like a good time to make insignias of swastikas hanging from nooses.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

US Coast Guard is now classified as a terrorist organization.

[–] Bot@sub.community 2 points 6 hours ago

Next step, put it on their flags?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 58 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They can reclassify all they like, people still know when they see someone wearing one of those symbols, they're looking at a POS.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] giantripdrop@piefed.social 17 points 11 hours ago

The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 27 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ohhh, boy, this is going to go over well with the Jewish and black servicemen and women, won't it?

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I’m sure that’s part of the intentions so they can fill the ranks with white incels

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

ding ding ding

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 hours ago

How long before they're flown on said US Coast Guard ships

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So, this naturally raises the question... if those things are taken off of the list of hate symbols, then what's left on the list of hate symbols?

I tried to find the answer by looking at the article, but all it has is this Excerpt from February 2023 U.S. Coast Guard policy document,

The following is a non-exhaustive list of symbols whose display, presentation, creation, or depiction would constitute a potential hate incident: a noose, a swastika, supremacist symbols, Confederate symbols or flags, and anti-Semitic symbols. The display of these types of symbols constitutes a potential hate incident because hatebased groups have co-opted or adopted them as symbols of supremacy, racial or religious intolerance, or other bias.

So, if that's non-exhaustive, there might be others, but surely, they'd list the worst symbols as examples. So, basically, there's nothing left that is identified as a hate symbol.

I personally find it interesting that they didn't do this in stages to hide their intent. Like, first remove the Confederate flag, and later remove the Nazi swastika. They did them both together at the same time, which I think shows that they do actually understand that the Confederate flag has the same basic meaning as the Nazi swastika today.

[–] Humana@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

They will be adding trans and pride flags in their place, maybe a Palestinian flag for good measure.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 16 points 13 hours ago

Well I still hate them.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Sounds like it's time for the targets of these symbols to quit the armed forces.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 2 points 13 hours ago

Overall, the researchers found that Grokipedia includes 12,522 citations to online sources that previous academic research has deemed as having very low credibility. And they found that Grokipedia cites those domains three times as often as Wikipedia.

Unlike Wikipedia, Grokipedia centralizes its editing process. Users can submit suggested edits to Grokipedia, but instead of assigning a group of volunteer community editors to decide on the edits, xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence company, controls whether or not a certain edit is approved and implemented on the website. The process of review is not entirely transparent, but the company has suggested that Grok, an artificial intelligence chatbot, plays a part in reviewing edit submissions. When a user submits an edit, it is approved or denied with “Grok Feedback.”