this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
458 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26500 readers
1655 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The governor told NBC News that the president's mental state should be serious cause for concern.

Gov. Tim Walz (D-Minn.) accused Donald Trump of behaving erratically after a Thanksgiving rant where he raged at the Democrat and called him a slur.

During a Sunday morning appearance on NBC News’ “Meet the Press,” the 2024 vice presidential candidate suggested the president was “fading physically,” and his “mental capacity” should also be serious cause for concern.

In a late Thursday evening rant, the Trump called Walz “seriously retarded” while falsely accusing him of allowing “hundreds of thousands of refugees from Somalia” to invade his state.

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 42 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] loie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Dementia face. I've seen that look so many times. I don't care how exhausted you are, nobody of sound mind makes that face in public.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

He's dreaming of sucking Clinton

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 88 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Start noticing it.

Its on about a 28 day cycle. I think its next week he should be getting the next injection. And he'll seem "pepped up" for about 10 days.

[–] ericatty 27 points 15 hours ago (4 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 68 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

An alzheimer's treatment.

I can't the clip handily, but it was on the Majority Report and they started a calendar after a nurse called in about a specific treatment, which requires regular and repeated MRI's to verify effectiveness, thats on just about a 28 day schedule, specifically for amyloid plaques. It needs to be done intravenously and apparently, they go for the hand or the forearm. The MRI's are to keep track of and look for monitoring progress of the disease, treatments. Sam started what he calls the "Trump period calendar" to keep track of it.

So Trumps had like 3-4 MRI's in the past 4 months? Each time its for his "annual" physical and its the "best they've ever seen", as well as being given a battery of extremely basic cognitive tests. Each time Trump starts to slag/ slide, within about 10 days we get news of walter reed visit, an MRI, and suddenly Trump is protecting their right hand from visibility.

I mean none of it is concrete and all very circumstantial, but look for the ~28 day cycle of Trump having pep, being more aggressive, then sliding there being reports of decline, then back to pep in his step the next week.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 hours ago

He also specifically mentioned the MRI wasn't of his brain so it was definitely for his brain.

[–] ericatty 42 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

Yeah its great that at least there is something.

Slowly having your memories taken away from you sounds like a particularly heinous torment.

[–] ericatty 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Some perts from the link:

On Jan. 26, 2025, the FDA approved once every four weeks maintenance dosing of lecanemab for early Alzheimer's disease. On August 29, the FDA approved weekly subcutaneous maintenance dosing of lecaneamb for early Alzheimer's disease. The hope is that at-home administration of the treatment will be less burdensome...

The treatment will allow people to have more time to participate in daily life and live independently.

Your health care provider will also do a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan before starting treatment with lecanemab

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 hours ago

approved just after Trump took office. definitely just correlation but it fits nicely for a conspiracy theory.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I've heard of 2 MRIs, when were the 3-4th?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

I thought we were in the 3-4 range but tbf, I don't actually keep close enough tabs to say that with 100% confidence. I know we're at a minimum in the 2+ range; I thought there were at least 3.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 24 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who just lost one grandparent to dementia and has another entering treatment (and in the process of being moved into a care facility) he definitely has dementia or a similar cognitive decline. If you watch him now when he's publicly speaking and compare it to his 2016 campaign he's just not the same person anymore. He's now seeming to not remember what he was to be speaking about, going on random unexpected tangents, needs to be led around by someone else when anywhere other than the White House (and may also need to be led around within the White House, but that's not as visible) occasionally walks completely a different direction from where he should be going, and he's lost his talent for remembering names, mixing people's names with associations when he speaks ("Tim Apple" of Apple CEO Tim Cook, or "Tim Minnesota" of Tim Walz) or occasionally naming someone who hasn't held the position in a very long time, looking directly at the solar eclipse while the eclipse glasses were in his hand (or pocket? I can't remember now) its all really clear dementia behavior. Also the tests he's described taking, he describes them exactly as coherently and in an extremely similar manner to my grandmother's descriptions of probably the same tests. She also knew she had an MRI (and named the wrong thing it was for) and kept saying it was tomorrow for a week, which is pretty comparable to how Trump has been talking about his MRIs.

Like, for a normal person in an assisted living facility, I'd say with his mix of ailments he might not even make it until the end of the year, but he has quite frankly the best access to healthcare of anyone in the entire world. We're going to watch this poor man regress until there's no sign of him left because his team refuses to publicly admit that their guy is dying. Honestly it feels like elder abuse, letting him act like a toddler on the world stage (which is what dementia does, its like the person regresses in age) instead of publicly announcing his decline and how his team will be reviewing his work and slowly taking over his duties as he becomes less capable, letting him decline not in the spotlight but in privacy. It'll be an interesting next few years for sure, because I'll be shocked if he survives to the end of his presidency

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 13 points 13 hours ago

Hopefully Melania isn't the new Nancy Reagan, making policy calls behind the scenes.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm skeptical of what your parent is saying...sounds quite like the adenochrome conspiracy theory. But at the same time, it's quite likely that the POTUS would get on medical trials if something seemed both promising and relatively safe.

With this particular president...I wouldn't put it past him to obtain some unethical treatment (such as proposed in the adenochrome conspiracy theory, but probably not actually adenochrome).

[–] ericatty 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Adrenochrome would be ironically hilarious since it's a big part of the Q conspiracy towards Hillary and stuff.

I always thought it was a fictional drug plot device in Fear and Loathing

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Adrenochrome is a real thing. It's a byproduct of the breakdown of adrenaline, and it itself breaks down into a compound that can be used as an anti-hemorrhage drug. It's also mass-produced and doesn't need to be harvested from humans.

But it was also in F&L.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ericatty 5 points 15 hours ago

Speed Extended Release? That would be a wild treatment for certain things.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 15 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How did the White House become a care home?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Corporate capture. 50+ are pretty set in their ways, you wouldn't want anyone to have a midlife crisis and think "oh fuck, oh shit I'm a bad fucking person we gotta change some shit!".

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Fronto temporal dementia

Neuropsychologist have been saying it since his first term.

https://youtu.be/9OtO-cypKmY

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 14 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

I'm all for the differently-abled having the same opportunities as everyone else, but this seems like a poor condition for the "leader of the 'free*' world" to have, right?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yup. Equality is unhelpful in the real world past a certain point. It’s better to think of equitability instead. Colour blind people can become pilots, but their rating is limited according to the extent of their condition, such as being banned from night flying, or not being given a commercial licence. So they have equality in being allowed to train and to take the medical assessment, and equitability in being treated differently due to their specific circumstances rather than in general terms.

As there are already restrictions on who can be president, it’s not too much to ask that they also be of sound mind. The equitable (indeed only sane) thing would be for anyone with dementia to be immediately removed from the military chain of command.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

Yeah I agree.

Cognitive/psychological disabilities are a bit different than physical disabilities.

We can acknowledge that.

Someone without the ability to think or plan or even be aware of where they are shouldn't be in charge of other people's lives or livelihoods.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

As far as I'm concerned, disabled folks should be able to be hired to do any job that a normally-abled person can do, if they can do it with reasonable accommodations. But I'm going to have some questions if a blind person wants to do color grading, or if a nonverbal person is applying to be a live interpreter. The answer isn't no, but I do have some questions.

Those questions grow with the number of lives that are at risk. A potential surgeon who has a motor control disability is probably going to need a longer interview. An air traffic controller with sensory processing issues, even longer. A nuclear bomb technician with uncontrolled hallucinations, let's block out most of the day.

A really old guy with memory, processing, and concentration issues wants a job running a decent chunk of the whole world? A job that takes heightened focus and quick decision making, and that regularly burns out people half his age? A job that has a lot of handles on foreign and domestic policy, and the nuclear codes? I think we should probably spending a couple of months talking about that, and poring over his medical records.

And then we should hire someone else instead, because come on

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

differently-abled

Taught this term as a kid, in recent years saw complaints from the referenced community, wonder if choosing “disabled” is best for balance these days 🤷‍♂️

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 26 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

"I would, but, uh, my dog ate them."

"Sir, you don't have a dog."

"Uhh, I meant - whathisname - Eric. Eric ate them."

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

"They can't be released while I'm under audit."

[–] atlasraven@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago

Not fading but senile. Doesn't remember people he's pardoned or his good friend Jeffrey Epstein.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

"I would, but, my dog ate them."

"Sir, you don't have a dog?"

"I had to show the dog who's boss! I ate the dog! I'M EATING THE CATS AND DOGS!!!"

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

By the transitive property, Trump ate the report.

[–] watson@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Leave it to Tim Walz to initiate a shrewd counter attack. Good. I’m glad he’s not taking this sitting down.

Don’t be too surprised if soon we hear the term “Dementia Don” or “Tizzy Trump”

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

If we're still working in nicknames, I submit Pedonald or Tronald Dump.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 16 hours ago

Anything released will not be released with any transparency or ounce of truth. Still good to ask, because it will only reflect on them how they will respond.

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What if we did charity donation events? All politicians have to fight and the public donates money to watch. All the money goes to creating a new government system and the fights go on until there is no one left.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It sounds fun on paper, but all we'd be left with is jocks running the government.

I agree we have a shit government now, but that wouldn't be an improvement. It would be an equally stupid government.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

First event is a civics test.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 11 hours ago

Maybe also throw in a "what would you do" staged events to specifically filter for people with empathy.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 4 points 16 hours ago
[–] richardmtanguay@lemmings.world 0 points 9 hours ago

Only if Walz will join our fight against our conquerors, but I'm sure he will keep allowing them to be there, thus making me more glad I left that state! :-(

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Can’t lose what you never had, Tim.