this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
228 points (99.6% liked)

World News

51601 readers
1926 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The CIA has assessed Ukraine was not targeting a residence used by Russian President Vladimir Putin in a recent drone attack in the north of his country, according to US officials, undercutting an assertion the Russian leader had made to President Donald Trump in a Monday phone call.

The CIA’s director John Ratcliffe briefed Trump on the assessment Wednesday, the officials said.

Sources said Ratcliffe later briefed Trump that the CIA did not believe it was true. And on Wednesday, Trump appeared to have adopted a more skeptical posture toward posting, posting a link to a New York Post editorial on Truth Social with the headline, “Putin ‘attack’ bluster shows Russia is the one standing in the way of peace.” The Post’s editorial board noted it was “rich that Putin, who has waged a brutal war for nearly four years, believes that any violence in his vicinity merits special outrage” and asserted that “Any attack on Putin is more than justified.”

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toppy@lemy.lol 1 points 33 minutes ago

I don't get it. It's war. Ukraine can attack anybody.

[–] Xittstorm@aussie.zone 2 points 47 minutes ago

It would be entirely acceptable that the country that a war criminal invaded targets said war criminal. But why would the rest of the world listen to the war criminal's lies regardless?

I guess war criminals stick together.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Why would it matter that they did?

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago

I wouldn't care if Ukraine deployed the fucking Hammer of Dawn onto all of Putin's properties and every Russian government building.

Russia is the aggressor and Putin is a fascist tyrant. The Russian state must be liquidated and Putin should be either executed or sentenced to life by the Hague.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

But what if it was?

Russia would quite happily kill zelenski given any chance and when peace does come, with Putin left in power, I guarantee you that he'll try to assassinate zelenski at the first possible moment

Sorry, but not sorry, Putin is a legitimate target and if killed might end this war (not to mention make the world a little better even)

Let them kill Putin, I only see upsides. This has nothing to do with him being Russian or whatever, this is him being a megalomaniac dictator who loves murdering people all the fucking time. How many people have been assassinated by now in Russia? How many outside Russia? Putin is a fucking menace to anyone, he needs to go

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I think the issue was that Putin wasn't there at the time. Only his daughter (i think) was, or possibly some other close member of his family.

Apart from that, I agree that Putin is a perfectly valid target, commander in chief and all that.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

So what if they targeted him? He's a war criminal, a legitimate target.

[–] pmk@piefed.ca 34 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

It matters if future security guarantees are conditional on Ukraine not attacking Russia. If Russia can claim they were attacked without any fact checking now, they might do the same in the future when it matters more. Showing Russia that their claims are not automatically believed is positioning for the future.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In countries where the military is aggressively attacking non-combatants in other countries, their war criminal leaders are the most legitimate targets imaginable.

Life isn't exactly like chess, in that in life, it's not always enough to eliminate the king. But, if you keep eliminating king after king until somebody reasonable assumes control, it seems like the least bloody way to end conflict.

[–] dublet@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Stepping on the tail only angers the snake. In order to defeat it, one must strike at the head.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Fucksake, yes. If there were a fund I could donate to specifically for financing drones to target every place that SOB lies his head, I'd be writing checks to it today.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Soldiers are killed on the battlefield. Kings are ransomed.

[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Should be the other way around. It's the kings who want war. Not the soldiers.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Oh, absolutely. But that world doesn't exist.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The Russians were LYING? I don't know what to say, I really thought higher of them.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago

Must be the first time they have done such a thing!

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Eh Trump will call the CIA fags and say Putin's far more trustworthy

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Or have them link it to Venezuela in some way so they can blow up more ports.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Or have them link it to Venezuela in some way so they can blow up more ports.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 9 points 7 hours ago

If only the POTUS would wait to hear from his intelligence officials before making public comments based on the word of an evil, lying, psychopathic dictator...

[–] homes@piefed.world 35 points 10 hours ago

Regardless, you can count on Trump to repeat whatever Putin tells him to say.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 11 points 9 hours ago

Russians are lying? Who would have guessed?

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

No shit. If Ukraine were going to do, they'd still be trying to dig putins corpse out of a pile of rubble

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

My assumption is that since magically every single drone without fail was shot down and they masterfully saved the mansion from this devastating attack is that... Russia sent the drones themselves at the mansion so they could shoot them down and blame Ukraine for attacking "civilian" targets, because Russia would never attack civvies.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago

5 people fired at the CIA in 10.... 9...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

obviously

it makes no strategic sense to attack one of his many fun-houses

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world -3 points 10 hours ago