this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
221 points (90.8% liked)

Fuck AI

5167 readers
2206 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This magazine is no longer legitimate.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmydripzdotz456@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (2 children)

FWIW, I think they pick the most influential person or persons, not the person I think is the best from the year. Hitler was person of the year and so was Trump.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

Exactly this. "AI" and the people behind it were highly newsworthy, it's not a prize and never has been.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

they pick the most influential person or persons,

Celebrating fascism along the way...

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In defense of Time magazine here they did have Hitler as person of the year once. Its just the most influential person/thing not the "best".

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

they also had "you" - meaning everyone - in 2006. So anyone who was alive then is technically included.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Celebrating hitler is not a "defense". jfc.

There are plenty of people who resisted.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hell of a way to announce you don’t understand the concept of Time Person of the Year

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that's the excuse they use when later it turns out that their picks weren't that good, but overall theme is that they try to show the positive people/events.

AI is being prepared as a revolution that can have positive benefits, they are also trying to mislead people that it can think, though when you actually use it for things like software engineering you quickly learn that it is now scam than anything.

The tool is only good in negative aspects such as disinformation and surveillance.

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

I love that series so much.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 14 points 1 week ago

Yes. Time being irrelevant and stupid is only a recent phenomenon.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 10 points 1 week ago

It is "the architects of ai", which is a bunch of tech CEOs, so even worse.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Legally so are corporations.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, Al is short for Alphonsejamin.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

ITT: people taking a fake award both at face value and way too seriously.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago

Seriously it's not even an honorific, it just describes the most newsworthy people from that year

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

ITT: people absorbing disinformation and fake news with zero critical faculty.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

That magazine was already irrelevant since a decade ago, I've never taken their person of the year thing serious

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

AI is definitelly the "Thing of the Year" in terms of its impact.

Doesn't mean it's a good thing though, just high impact (and impact which is going to be even higher when the bubble collapses dragging the rest of the American Economy with it).

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its not a good person contest. It's people who have been prominent.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, but if you can read, it clearly states the architects of AI, who are people.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They're making that look like fine print...

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

Copying my earlier comment: The front page literally says: "the architects of AI" are the person of the year.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

wonder if mortgage lenders were person of the year in 2007

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

I think it was just mortgages... but it might've said "brokers" really tiny in fine print.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

But... I'm awesome 🥺

[–] Zier@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

It's Time ended long ago.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Cover looks like slop.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone here is complaining that AI isn't a person and bringing up 2006... Nobody seems to remember 1982's person of the year.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was 2 in 1982 so how about you enlighten me?

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I wasn't even born yet but I still know how to use the Internet to find out it was the computer

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

it. never. was.

[–] 01189998819991197253 3 points 1 week ago

Is this real? This can't be real. Is it?...

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

OP tell us who you would put up there instead and why

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I stopped considering it legitimate when they claimed that I was person of the year in 2006. I didn't even do anything besides post on myspace, leave youtube comments, drank vodka, and slept around.

What? It was my early 20s.....if you don't wake up five different times, in five different womens beds, where you have no clue who they are, where you are, or where your kidneys are....then you're not doing your early 20s right!

Now.....early 40s? I drink a lot of water. Did you know you should be drinking more water? Because you should be drinking more water.