this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
265 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27112 readers
3823 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Joseph H. Thompson, a career federal prosecutor who was the acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota last year, quit after the Justice Department sought to examine the woman’s supposed ties to activist groups.

Notice how they federal government is targeting the victims, not the traitors who are levying war against the United States on orders from the White House

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Won’t be long before the entire government is filled with loyalists. I guess this is why it took Hitler a few years to really get the ball rolling.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

And if they stay, they get hung because “following orders is not an excuse”

I agree we need insiders to fight back but what do you want from them? Do you expected them to be jailed, their families homeless? Trump would find a way.

So, can’t say I blame them for wanting their names clear of this, without experiencing the revenge of a madman.

EDIT: clarity

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

It's worth noting that almost all the rank and file just went home after the war. Nuremberg only prosecuted two hundred people. Only got 161 convictions, 37 death sentences. That's all. Everyone else got to walk away.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 10 points 23 hours ago

And if they stay, they get hung because “following orders is not an excuse”

I think ideally they'd stay and subtly fuck up the administration's plans. Like how prosecutors routinely fail to indict cops. But that's asking a lot

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

I'm not asking, expecting or blaming. Just making an observation.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The administration is run by ghouls. And I don't mean Walton Goggins.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Feral ghouls

[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If they leave: “Quitters! Now Trump will place his own stooges in the position! What a terrible move! They should have stayed and just done a bad job!”

If they stay: “I can’t believe these people can work for that regime! Where are their morals? If you take a pay check from a nazi, you are a nazi! Wait til we have our Nuremberg! Who’s just following orders then?”

There is no good answer here. I think it is scary that the position will be filled by worse people, but I also understand that when the shit hits the fan, I would prefer to be distanced from that regime. These people are individuals with families and lives we don’t understand. How long have they been pushing back against this shit? And how much is enough for an individual to endure?

I work a low-stakes job that belittles me and ignores my opinions. I could not imagine that my mental health would be better if I was also working for nazis, and the people I wanted to help saw me as a nazi too. I hope they stay safe.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Get fired, don't quit?

[–] Gathorall@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So, it's not like they're going to run out of prosecutors, is leaving the case to someone who doesn't have a problem with the nature of the investigation a real solution?

Also the prosecutor is supposed to take point on the focus of any investigation, bowing out is far less bad optics than the justice department outright steering an active investigation.

[–] mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago

The only upside is as competent people leave, loyal but incompetent people have to do the work instead, which lead to outcomes like the failed Comey and James indictments....but those are hollow victories that are soon overshadowed by the next injustice

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

Maybe it's not that much of a matter of the common better (somebody elected Trump, after all) but a matter of personal integrity. Not everybody is willing to do anything, after all.