this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
623 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

19037 readers
42 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Context: He's in the files

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psud@aussie.zone 5 points 6 days ago

Of course he is associated with Epstein. He would have been brought to Epstein's parties as a celebrity to entertain the other guests

Probably true of several people.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 117 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

Is it because our solar system is hurdling through space at over 1.5 million miles per hour, so anyone who time travels will find themselves alone in an empty void?

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Time travel as a sudden jump seems one of the least plausible implementations, since we have no idea how to do such jumps even in just space or forward in time; and allowing for it would break a lot of physics.

More plausible alternatives include a space-time bridge, meaning both sides can follow Earth's reference frame; or the Primer-type where one can reverse time in an isolated box in a way where you can only travel backwards along the Box' trajectory and you have to wait inside that box for some time while you move backwards in time along that trajectory.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 111 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

There's no universal frame of reference. Any theoretical time travel would likely need a beacon of some sort to calibrate their arrival point, meaning you couldn't travel back beyond the point time travel was established.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You know what they say: the best time to build a time machine is 50 years ago.

I think that's basically the movie Primer too, they'd turn the machine on, go hide in an apartment for X amount of time, then go back to the machine and emerge 5 minutes after they turned it on and just walked away.

But gravity effects time, sticking close to a planet isn't going to be hard.

Ironically enough the first (if we ever get them) time machines are going to be a hell of a lot like modern "UFOs" are described. You couldn't risk landing on the planet, elevation changes are what's really a nightmare to account for. Show up and hour early and everything is a foot higher because of how fast we're spinning.

So you'd want a space craft, because space is big and empty. And realistically it's going to take something bigger than a telephone booth or even the 1980s embodiment of Florida on four wheels with a hood designed to do cocaine off of to house a time machine.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've seen this take a lot it feels like and it boggles the mind why. If someone figures out time travel they ipso facto will have figured out the space travel as well.

If you can travel through time you can travel through space.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Listen, dude: I’ve got a lot more concerts in my list before I get to your lame-ass party.

Would you have missed Metallica in Moscow for some party you assumed nobody would attend? Fuck no.

Now if you’ll excuse me I’m gonna go sell all your grandmothers some really strong modern weed to get into Hendrix, New Year’s Eve, 1969.

Can’t wait to hear Machine Gun live.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

lame-ass party

Since the time traveler would be from the future, he'd have already known that nobody went to the party.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

XKCD rule: lame ass-party.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would you have missed Metallica in Moscow for some party you assumed nobody would attend? Fuck no.

Let's see... the egotistical pricks that sued anyone that wanted to like them... in an authoritarian shithole... or hanging out with Stephen Hawking...

Tough choice. Can I convince Lars to sleep in the disaster bed? Or help them with arrangements so that songs that have about 1 minute of interesting music don't have 8 minutes worth of filler?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 52 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Now, I’m speaking hypothetically, legally, and for educational purposes only… you fast-forward a few decades and suddenly certain names appear in court documents and flight logs, not convictions, not proof of wrongdoing, just… associations. Enough to make a careful chrononaut say, ‘You know what? I’m not popping back in time to shake hands and eat shrimp.’

The absence at that party wasn’t evidence that time travel failed. It was evidence that it worked, and everyone who could come already knew how the story looked later.

History doesn’t just judge actions. It judges proximity. And no self-respecting time traveler shows up early to something that turns awkward in hindsight.

[–] TeamAssimilation 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

More pragmatically, time travel for a casual party would be risky because you’re carrying germs many generations apart. Time travelers would wear full-body suits or risk dramatically altering history. They could not drink or eat anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (8 children)

There is also the idea that time machines work like telephones. You need to have a receiving end made first before you can call it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 37 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What are the chances that visiting Steven Hawking is the most interesting/fun thing you can do, if you could freely time travel? I'd much rather go look at dinosaurs, or visit the construction of the pyramids, or go listen to Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech.

Even if my goal was to meet a single scientist, I think I'd personally pick any other. Pliny the Elder, Marie Curie, Albert Einstein...

Not to be rude to Mr. Hawking (well, maybe he deserves it, I don't know what got him in to the Epstein files...), but a thorougly average party is simply not likely to attract very many time travellers.

What are the chances that visiting Steven Hawking is the most interesting/fun thing you can do, if you could freely time travel? I’d much rather go look at dinosaurs, or visit the construction of the pyramids, or go listen to Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech.

I would counter that if you have a time machine then you literally have all the time in the world and you can do all of those things, and more.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Honestly, even if time travel were theoretically possible to be invented, there's also a high chance that we're just going to destroy ourselves before we get to that point anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What the fuck is he in the files for? What did he allegedly do? He’s bound to the chair!

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 51 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Likely lots of people who had contact with Epstein did nothing wrong, at least not on that level.

He was collecting powerful people, in science, business, government, anything. One way to do that is to offer access to other important people. The ability to say to someone "I can connect you with Stephen Hawking" is currency.

The pedophilia ring and sex trafficking is the exact same thing -- just a way to appeal to certain people.

I think it's more interesting to talk about who the fuck gave Epstein a private island in one of the most stupidly expensive spits of sand on the entire planet. Likely the same people who killed him.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (25 children)

It's a little ableist to suggest that his being wheelchair-bound would necessarily prevent him from being a pedophile.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 23 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I have thoughts.

It was ridiculous that Hawking thought a time traveler would make it to his party for several reasons. There are a few models of time travel, and only one of them has an internal logic that allows for traveling without paradoxical consequences; multiversal divergence.

Our version of the time traveler party was one of an infinite amount of time traveler parties that hawking hosted throughout the multiverse. A time traveler would be traveling to that time like picking a grain of sand on a beach, where each grain of sand is a near identical party to the last.

As our version of the party diverges from the realities with time travelers who chose to travel to the hawking party, there would be a diminishing set of infinities containing time travelers that were attempting the journey.

Thus while the chances of a time traveler going to the party are 100%, the party being our version of the party approach 0 infinitely fast.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can spend your entire life thinking about it and you Will never reach a definitive answer. Or, you can spend a day to set up an experiment and throw a party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

You're missing the point completely.

You do not actually know if "paradoxical consequences" are a thing. Logic might, like everything we believe right now, turn out not to be how the world works.

Stopping yourself from doing an experiment because "current knowledge makes it seem impossible" is how science never advances.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›