Sounds way better.
Memes of Production
Seize the Memes of Production
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
What a load of revisionist / "noble savage myth" horseshit. See e.g. the punishments used by members of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy for theft.
Every society has had theft. Every society has had thieves. Every society has had to deal with this.
What I will note is that native Americans didn't invent the prison-industrial complex.
I came here to talk about the "Noble savage BS" myth. I wrote a college paper on it. Society always had a small fraction of psychopaths who didn't follow the laws of man. Society also knew to lock them up, or get rid of them.
Fun fact: the noble savage was originally counted by hateful racists, before it was repurposed by more "well meaning" racists.
Trump's trying to bring back the exile/deport for crimes thing at least.
One can do a deep dive in how American Native Peoples dealt with societal issues. Yes, there absolutely were all the same problems we have today, from theft to lazy people to “fame” issues. Look up “Shame the Meat” for example. There were also punishments, some severe.
So the idea that tribal societies had it all figured out is absurd. They were people too, and had problems like anyone else.
It is the "noble savage myth" if it is a quote from a leader in the Lakota nation? https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Fire_Lame_Deer
"Can people incorrectly lionize the past of their own cultures, a past they never even experienced and don't even have the excuse of nostalgia for?"
[quick glance at any number of reactionaries, revanchists, and nationalists]
Yes. Next question.
It's not credited, there's just a picture of an indigenous person that people aren't expected to recognize. The image is meant to imply that this is how all indigenous people lived by not specifying, using the words of one singular person from one singular nation to do so, which may not even be true to such an extent. The image is taking the quote and using it to perpetuate the myth.
No but it is from John fire lame deer
The unilateral and undisputed expert on every single indigenous nation's philosophy, culture, and law, John Fire Lame Deer?
No. Sorry that I answered your question
I understand your feelings but that information was already provided.
Yes.
"Before electricity, we had no dishwashers, therefore we had no dirty dishes"
Dirty Dishes existed before dishwashers. Dirty dishes didn’t exist before Dishes.
If your society doesn’t have a concept of ownership. Then theft (atleast between members) doesn’t exist in the same way.
If your society doesn’t have a concept of law. Then “criminality” doesn’t exist either.
tbf, that post is noble savage bs.
that being said, the number one driver for crime is poverty, police don't fight poverty, they just protect the wealthy from the poor they are exploting.
I do really think that in small communities, there would be no problem abolishing the police. But the problem I see which I don't think I've seen a good argument for, is how it can work at scale. We generally live in much larger and denser communities than the native peoples lived, so it seems like the strategies they used to handle bad-actors won't work in the same way for us.
With denser cities we have lost a sense of community, so we stop helping each other and problems become police or government issues, but neither of those replace a genourous family member or friend helping you through rough times.
Here's something to think about:
Why do we live in much larger and denser communities now?
For the majority of human existence we've lived in rural communities. What drove the urbanisation of rural populations?
During covid many places saw the reverse, ruralisation of urban populations. In an anarchist utopia that has removed capitalism, do you think people would stick with large dense urban environments or, like during covid, begin to ruralise again?
If you're unsure of what your opinion is on these questions. Somewhere to start could be looking at the Scottish Highland clearances, the Industrial Revolution in the UK, and the textile industry of the British Empire. All are major factors as to why Scotland urbanised. Most countries urbanised for similar reasons, but these examples are very well documented and very overt so make it more clear than many other places do.
Don't tell him where horses came from.
Is it when a mummy horse and daddy horse love each other very much?
Where is this quote originally from? There's no attribution

Lame Deer, J. F., & Erdoes, R. (1972). Lame Deer, seeker of visions: The life of a Sioux medicine man. Simon & Schuster.
With citations and photos? You da mvp. Thanks, amigo.
Wait a minute, you trying to tell me that anarchy was better??
A collective society for the benefit of all instaed of a few
Sure they had slaves and the typical patriarchal society where women were treated like property, but at least you never had to worry about leaving your tipi unlocked, those were the good old days.
Umm some indigenous peoples were matriarch societies, and many were matrilineal land ownership.
@Deceptichum So ein Bullshit!
Native Americans waren Menschen wie alle andern auch, haben gemordet, vergewaltigt und sich für irgendwelche Status-Symbole oder Stammeszugehörigkeiten gegenseitig abgemetzelt. Der Kapitalismus hat das nicht besser gemacht aber die waren genauso wenig heilige wie jede andere Menschen Gruppe irgendwo anders auf der Welt!
Die haben wie die meisten anderen Menschen auch in autoritären, patriarchalischen Strukturen der Gewalt gelebt!
Translated to English:
@Deceptichum What a load of rubbish! Native Americans were people like everyone else, they murdered, raped and slaughtered each other for status symbols or tribal affiliations. Capitalism didn't make things any better, but they were just as unholy as any other group of people anywhere else in the world!
Like most other people, they lived in authoritarian, patriarchal structures of violence!
Don’t shit on John Fire Lame Deer just because he challenges your understanding of how society can function.
No one is claiming they were perfect and lived in complete harmony with each other 100% of the time in a utopia. That’s a strawman you’re creating to resist listening to what is being said.
"We had no criminals, we had no thieves, we only wanted things to give them away" is a very curious thing to assert as non-utopian; equally curious to assert it as how Sioux society was, considering they were famously warlike against fellow indigenous cultures. I suppose they wanted to give away violence?
White colonialism made the lives of indigenous people worse. But it didn't do it because it 'invented crime', or 'invented greed'.
It’s easy to have a utopia when you live in a village where everybody knows each other. You don’t have to look to indigenous peoples for that. There are plenty of villages around the world where communities still thrive.
How do you achieve that in cities of a million people or countries of a hundred million? No one has figured that out yet because all the mechanisms we’re born with for building trusting, reciprocal relationships do not scale much more than a couple hundred people at most.
I wish I could live this way
So did they