this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
1310 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81611 readers
4772 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TTt@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

European administration offices don't need the best technologies in the world, they just need a freakin office program they can trust...

[–] Steve@communick.news 389 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (15 children)

According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Is Google seriously arguing that the money these nations save can't be added to their GDPs?
That's what it sounds like. Or am I confused?

[–] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 228 points 6 days ago

Google meant THEIR economic growth.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 164 points 6 days ago

Don't worry, Google is trying to confuse you

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 108 points 6 days ago (2 children)

To an enormous extent are todays data centers, cloud providers, and all the techology the whole world use today based on open source. Without linux, curl, ffmpeg, and so on nothing in todays high tech society would work. Google, as it is today, would not exist if it was for all the open source they leech of.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] notso@feddit.org 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Drug dealer critizises addict's intention to get clean.

[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 31 points 4 days ago

It means we're doing something right.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 92 points 5 days ago (1 children)

MoRe OpTiOnS iS bAd FoR cOmPeTiTiOn

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

competition is bad for competition

checks out

translation: having more competitors harms our chance of winning against them

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 72 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Funny considering how much of Google was built on open software.

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. Open source is fine when it suits them but not fine when it doesn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 246 points 6 days ago (9 children)

The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness.

Just what I'd expect a monopoly to say.

Fuck you. Alphabet.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 39 points 5 days ago
[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 126 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Drug dealer criticizes drug user's plan to quit."

[–] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The British came to China with warships when the Chinese government wanted to ban Opium. So I wouldn't expect anything else from these crapitalists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement.

Are we in a context of rapid technological advancement ? I would say we are in a context of dire technological stagnation.

«AI» is a mirage that is utterly failing at pretty much everything it is applied to, and in every other domain I would say tech progress is coming to a halt now that our new feudal lords have conquered so much of the market.

This push by the EU is, apart from digital sovereignty, a very necessary push to get some innovation going again. I hope more complementary measures will follow ; we really need hardware sovereignty as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 51 points 5 days ago

Car company complains that city is developing Metro system.

[–] Concur6053@lemmy.today 31 points 5 days ago

Probably the most resounding endorsement they could hope for

[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 70 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Remember, whenever you see a patently weak argument like this from a trillion dollar corporation, they’re not saying it because they think anyone will believe it. They’re saying it to give the corrupt politicians in their pocket some way to pull a straight face when voting in the corporation’s favour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schema@lemmy.world 84 points 5 days ago

Thanks for confirming we're on the right track, google.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 73 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Wrong.

creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement

Wrong.

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms

What does he not understand about digital sovereignty?

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users

No, for Google. Also, wrong.

that the market moves faster than legislation and warns, that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.”

If that's the price to avoid technofaschism... And, again, wrong.

Tl;dr: stop wanking, Walker.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 62 points 5 days ago

The leopard of consequences is hungry for tech oligarch faces.

Eat, you majestic creature. And godspeed.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 59 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm not sure why anyone in EU, bloc or therefore canada should even care what an American company opinion would be at this point. They said they were moving on. They did.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 137 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When companies like Google, Microsoft, etc. are starting to squirm and whimper. You know you are on the right path. So I take this as a sign that the EU is heading in the right direction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 65 points 5 days ago

Fuck you, Google.

[–] 01189998819991197253 38 points 5 days ago

Not good for whose growth? Because it'll be perfectly fine for eu. The fact that google is upset about this, should be all the tell you need to know you're on the right path.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 122 points 6 days ago (40 children)

Of course Google hates open-source. They can't compete with it. Same shit with Microsoft: people are just afraid of trying Linux, but those who do, rarely look back at Windows.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Tough shit, you supported the MAGA movement and Europe, thankfully, reacted accordingly. Simply put, the good folks in the EU lost faith in the USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 95 points 6 days ago (4 children)
  1. Shift over to open source.
  2. Invest 25--50% of what you currently pay for proprietary software into helping maintain and enhance open source software.
  3. Enjoy the economic benefits well maintained free software brings to every aspect of your digital infrastructure at no extra cost.
[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Open source will innovate so much faster if properly funded, without the shackles of copyright and companies holding advancements secret and not releasing innovations on purpose as long as they hold on edge on "competition". Competition is only important because of proprietary capitalism, remove capitalism and directly reward the workers and innovation happens for innovation's sake.

Can't wait for this to be proven in practice, and to be able to apply that more widely to society. Godspeed Europe

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 5 days ago

More desperate pleas by Google. I just saw an article by some Google shill that made a case against self hosting. Next they'll try to make it illegal.

[–] MattGade@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 10 points 4 days ago

Fuck Alphabet, forever

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 81 points 6 days ago (4 children)

You guys don’t see what they’re scared shitless about? It’s the fear of an EU-based true open source Android fork/competitor.

Also when they say FOSS will not contribute to “economic growth”, they mean Alphabet’s. Greedy pigs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 60 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

All these craptastic US tech companies originally started on internationally developed free and open source software. They hoover up capital and talent then abuse their market power. Fuck them all.

They all run on Linux - Torvalds is a Swedish speaking Finn. Greg KH who maintains stable is German. So many libraries and core system contributions by Germans like Drepper and Poettering. Youtube ran on mysql for years from Finnish Widenius. Google built a lot of stuff with Python - from Dutch Guido van Rossum and c++ from Danish Stroustrup. All of the video and audio sites rely heavily on ffmpeg, orginally from French Fabrice Bellard. Lots of them also using virtualisation stuff which includes qemu, also from Bellard. So much comp sci research from Europe and UK. Chrome and Safari originated with KDE (German) code. Europe did all the heavy lifting while the US took all the profits. I'm not even European but every country has the same experience. They have no idea how they are viewed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago

Alarm Systems Bad For Business, Burglar Claims

[–] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 5 days ago

We literally removed "don't be evil" from our mission statement, but you can totally trust us, bro.

Google

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 62 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection

No, this is fundamentally impossible. The US has the Cloud Act. As long as that exists, this is a nonstarter.

The US can change their laws to not have a global wiretap and secret backdoor warrant program, then this would be possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aqua@lemmy.zip 41 points 5 days ago

really fun fuck you google

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (4 children)

YSK that this is a) ragebait farming you for ad revenue and b) disinformation.

In the FT article referenced, there is no mention of open source.

Neither on his LI, which has a free access link to the FT article: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/kent-walker-5963bb198_google-warns-eu-against-erecting-walls-activity-7428100995995398144-I9Ac

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 34 points 5 days ago

How DARE they try to ELIMINATE our Services after ALL the MONEY we Poured in Donald Trump's POCKETS!

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 5 days ago (7 children)

If nobody in Europe paid for Google products think of the economic benefit to Europe if all that saved cash was then spent by the people on European products and services.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 5 points 4 days ago

it stated that the creation of regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement.

"RaPiD tEcHnOlOgIcAl AdVaNcEmEnT", we all know what that is.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 35 points 5 days ago (3 children)

What happened to: "Google ❤️ open source"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] klay1@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

bad for competition? If people want FOSS software, well go make a good product then!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] madjo@piefed.social 53 points 6 days ago

Kiss my European ass, Google.

[–] DevotedShitStain69@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Fuck Google!

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"It's afraid" still image from Starship Troopers

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›