this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
1034 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

83753 readers
2290 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] markz@suppo.fi 346 points 1 week ago (21 children)

Now gimme one without smart tv bullshit

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago (7 children)

They exist, but they're called commercial monitors

[–] tyler@programming.dev 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Are there gaming screens like that though? Cause I thought commercial monitors were all slow response.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've got a 43" Aorus 4k gaming screen for my desktop. 144Hz, freesync, 2 HDMI's a DisplayPort and a USBC. There is a 48" OLED as well, but I didn't have the space for it at the time.

After using a 4k 43" for a monitor for a few years, I definitely both recommend it AND wish companies would make 8k ones.

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Does anything useful even come in 8K at this point? I saw it as a spec last time I went television shopping, but it seemed like something that wouldn't be useful for another decade.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

8k is effectively dead

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He should have said commerical displays, which are basically TV's rated for long continuous use e.g. digital signage.

I haven't dealt with them in some time, but I would imagine many, if not most, do not include consumer smart tv features, although they probably have other embedded smart tech to help with stuff like signage.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (32 children)

The smart TV part is conceptually okay, but the bullshit is unspeakable. I actually like that TVs have apps for the streaming services and stuff, if they didn't have to be evil about how they implement it. But they're evil, so here we all are, wanting completely dumb TVs.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I don't really agree that is conceptually okay. TVs and computers have drastically different life cycles. That TV will still be kicking probably a decade after the internal Smart TV computer is uselessly underpowered. This same problem is arguably even worse with cars.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Every invention this century....

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 216 points 1 week ago (10 children)

It's not going to be cheap, though — in the US, the 65-inch model is officially priced at $3,499.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I’d happily pay that for a pc-gaming quality dumb panel the size of a traditional tv.

But ima need 3 or 4 display port inputs.

I also probably want full sized display port inputs over usb-c form

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 90 points 1 week ago (9 children)

HOPEFULLY this is the beginning of the end for HDMI.

[–] borth@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] markz@suppo.fi 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You gotta start somewhere. If this sells, there might be another.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Ah so close!

If it lacked any smart tv features and had displayport it would be my next tv.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 51 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Does it act as a dumb monitor? Can all smart TV features be permanently disabled?

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You can prolly just not connect it to Wi-Fi but I seriously doubt any TVs these days don't have this bullshit.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tldr; This article reads like my own particular preferred brand of copium.

Nvidia Tried this with BFG (Big Format gaming Displays) but most of them never made it to market. I think Microcenter carried one model and it was expensive for what you were getting. Back in those days having the nvidia gsync sticker easily double the price of any monitor and making it a ~60" tv wasn't an exception.

I can't be the only person who wants display port but I fear this must have to do with the HDMI Forum being the current cable standard mafia and supporting anything other than HDMI is like giving up an inch of the total control they have over the TV industry. They (Sony, Phillips, Toshiba, Hitachi, etc) are effectively colluding against TV buyers and controlling the market and eliminating competition.

With that being said, the USB-C port on these TVs has been around and Ive seen other reviewers show that the high sense implementation is not the panacea (yet) that gamers desire. Its more for like, plugging in your Macbook to your TV.

Still, if this TV came out tomorrow and Wendell from Level1techs said "your Linux pc can get 4k, 120hz, HDR FreeSync out of this" and showed it working, $3500 dollars wouldn't stop me from buying it.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Still, if this TV came out tomorrow and Wendell from Level1techs said “your Linux pc can get 4k, 120hz, HDR FreeSync out of this” and showed it working, $3500 dollars wouldn’t stop me from buying it.

I wish I was this rich to impulse buy something that expensive because a man on the internet said something positive abouti t.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, you see, when you know and understand Linux well, your chances to become rich are increasingly higher.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)
  • Most people are poor
  • Most people use Windows

Coincidence?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

Hisense UR9 RGB, but note that the port is on the left bezel of the panel. Hopefully saved you a click.

[–] RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can you install KDE TV on it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I love that the author refers to Hisense as "it" rather than they. Corporations aren't people!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Sounds great! I'll gladly pay $200usd for it.

I skimmed the article and didn't see any mention of price, but I expect it to be 10x what I'm willing to spend on a display.

Also if it's a smart tv I'm no longer interested at all.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] foodvacuum@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Damn. Too expensive for me. My TV has a dark spot after 8 years. I'm going to be on the market for a new one in the next year or two and displayport would be sweet. Hopefully this starts a trend. This is Hisence and am excited to see reviews for the latest TCL models to drop

load more comments
view more: next ›