this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
245 points (74.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39097 readers
4780 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Slavery didn't end because the slaves revolted. It ended because white people fought to abolish it. The North could have allowed the South to continue on as a separate nation with slaves, but they insisted the Confederacy remain with the Union, AND end slavery.

Often the downtrodden need those in power to use that power to fight for them.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like you're a white savior

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No, I have a degree in history. I prefer facts to vibes.

The simple truth is that slavery was ended by the Civil War, with a Union Army that was 10% black soldiers, and 90% white soldiers. That's just a simple fact, from our National Archives.

It isn't revisionist history to acknowledge that slavery was ended primarily through the deaths of white soldiers, and pointing that out doesn't make me a white savior. I have also heavily studied Critical Race Theory, and think it should be taught at a high school level in America. I think we could go a long way in educating Americans about the true and significant contributions of black Americans, but that doesn't require making up new facts that support our personal fantasies. That's MAGA thinking.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Sounds like you have a deep disdain for anyone non white, you should consider working on that. By the way, your degree, HIStory, sexist as fuck.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, I tried to be respectful, and offer facts as my reply, but this one is a special kind of self-righteous dickhead.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yes that's why I'm asking you to work on your outdated, sexist and racist beliefs.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Nothing I said was wrong, and you didn't even attempt to dispute it. You just went straight to calling me names because I pointed out the simple historical fact that an enormous army of primarily white soldiers was the primary driver of the end of slavery. I acknowledged that slaves and black soldiers helped, but it is simply an historical fact that the war wasn't ended by a General Strike (which may not even have really happened, it was just one person's characterization of the situation), it was ended by the overwhelming might of the Union Army, which was 90% white. Sorry if the truth makes you uncomfortable.

You are a shallow thinker who doesn't understand that pointing out actual historical facts that don't align with your 21st century ideologies doesn't make me sexist or racist, just accurate.

Your insistence that I'm sexist and racist is ignorant, and silly. Besides, where did you get Sexist from? We were talking about slavery, so I could see where a confused person could somehow fall back on a racist label, but sexist? That wasn't part of the discussion in any way. That was just you piling on to someone you've decided to hate simply because they repeated a truth that makes you uncomfortable. You're the one spewing the bigotry, not me.

Maybe YOU should work on THAT.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Your degree is in HIS-story. HIS being the prefix you're choosing to use. It's blatantly sexist by ignoring the plight women have suffered throughout time. Classic white savior tactic. Obfuscate the truth to push a racist narrative. You really think things would be better if the south won? Why would you even imply something like that?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Someone is off their meds.

Your degree is in HIS-story HIS being the prefix you're choosing to use.

Imagine thinking that this is a valid argument - that "choosing" to use the world History makes me sexist, because history has His in it, so I must accept all the sexist stereotypes that have occured in HIS-tory. Or maybe I'm sexist because I won't call it Herstory?

The word history originates from the Ancient Greek historia, meaning "inquiry," "knowledge acquired by investigation," or "account of one's inquiries".

So you see, the word history has nothing to do with gender, just because it has the letters H-I-S in it. It isn't derived from anything to do with gender or sex, and trying to attach those meanings to it thousands of years after the fact isn't just poor scholarship, it's the sign of a really STUPID person.

I've got an idea, let's change the subject, and argue about whether antiHIStamines are Lesbian, and if men should be allowed to take them.

Oh, yeah, I just can't let that last one go. How does acknowledging that the Union Army was 90% white, a simple historical fact, imply that I wanted the South to win? That was obviously some attempt at an insult, but it didn't work.

You're telling me what you think I need to work on, so I'll suggest that you really need to learn about Critical Thinking Skills. Because you don't have any, and I doubt that you've ever been heard the term.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Look bucko, I calls em like I sees em. You keep tippity typing all this stuff trying to get me to join your Klan. Not gonna happen sport, I wont join your racist side of the aisle. I support all people, not just the WHITE MEN like you seem to. Try reading a book sometime young man.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Young man? Closing on an attempted compliment, well done. Wrong about everything else, though, and since calling out my age probably wasn't a compliment, my age, too.

Don't be looking out for any party invitations from me. I like my parties to be fun.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, see, that's not fun at a party.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine thinking that only minorities can stand up for minority rights. What's your suggestion then, that White people have no business doing anything but maintaining the status quo, because it's not their place to speak out for others?

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago
[–] slowmolaggins@thelemmy.club 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is a hilarious take. How far do you think it would go if only black people cared about black problems? If only black people fought against slavery, I'm almost certain it would still be widespread publicly. It still certainly is t fixed. We still have systemic corruption and incarceration based servitude for slave wages, but on an individual level, it's been mostly taken care of and because it wasn't just the directly affect fighting against it. No, minorities do not need anyone to speak for them, but other people, especially those of the same race as the oppressors, it needs to happen. Otherwise "they're just being uppity again."

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Get em dude

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

As a trans white woman, tbh I remember when the discussion was that privileged people should be amplifying minority voices and talking points, and at least on the axes I'm oppressed along I stand by that position. A lot of people are unwilling to listen to me about my humanity, but they are a hell of a lot more likely to listen to my cis relatives.

Also those discussions can be exhausting for the affected and having the non affected doing 101 level talks with each other spares me them.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn we getting mad at white women again?

As someone that defended humanity of Palestinians and spoke out against Israel genocide, it's okay if white women talk about the plight of others or the oppression they suffer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i think some people are missing the point in that its making fun of the people that do this for the vanity instead of actually caring

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Newsteinleo 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If it's intended to call out the vain, why does it say white liberals?

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Newsteinleo 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Are you saying all white people who advocate for minorities are virtue seeking and self congratulating

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, I am making that genuine and sincere statement in a shitpost.

[–] Newsteinleo 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Does that mean you believe white liberals don't actually care about minorities?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 105 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I worry about this sometimes. I don't ever want to be seen as speaking "for" minorities I'm not a member of, but I do want to be seen speaking "up for" them. And I worry about finding the right balance. I don't want to speak over them, but do want to help make it clear that I support them and I am opposed to those who are opposed to them. I don't want to be MLK's "white moderate".

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 day ago

You don't need to worry about shit. Propaganda like the OP's serves only to make you feel guilty about speaking up, pushing you to become one of MLK's white moderates.

If you're in a position to advocate for a group who's voice is being muffled, do it.

You already know the distinction between that and talking over them - don't let internet bullshit blur the line.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 67 points 2 days ago

I feel that the most important thing is to speak out against the people who oppose minorities' rights. You don't need to speak for minorities to oppose those who oppress them.

[–] CubitOom 51 points 2 days ago

Don't worry, this is just chud racist propaganda in an attempt to divide the left by race.

Speak truth to power and punch Nazis.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Most folks I know just want you to treat em like people. And if someone's being a dick to the it's certainly right to call it out (and maybe spit on em if the circumstance permits).

[–] BrainBow65@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

I struggle with this too. I'm reading White Fragility by Robin DiAngelo right now though and it's main suggestion is to just oppose racism when you see it. Call white people out on their behavior even if it makes everyone uncomfortable and makes you unpopular.

Also, to listen to feedback from people of color without getting defensive. No one is going to be perfect and we live in a system which is constantly socializing us, it's ok if we fuck up but just try and fix it when you learn better.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] night_petal@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am a cis white woman. My opinion has never, in my life, mattered to any real consequence. I am not liberal, I am an anarchist. Fuck this title. My opinion has never mattered in the scheme of things and never will. What's the best I could ever do? Be loud on Twitter? Maybe run for minor local office and lose to a rich fuck? No. My opinions do not, in fact matter. They never have, and they never will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, back in real life. At a protest? Yes, it's valuable for white people to speak up, since they're more difficult for police to persecute. Sorry you're too uninformed and naice to realize this, so wise OP.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 36 points 2 days ago (4 children)

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist

Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist

Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist

Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew

Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Nobody needs/wants the white liberal to speak for them, but another voice in the crowd demanding something surely can't be a bad thing?

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Apparently OP is "all white people are bad! the people who are on our side and those who are not! silence!!"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wraekscadu@vargar.org 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Racist post. I hope it isn't tolerated by the community.

Do activists with a messiah complex exist? Yes. Are they annoying? Yes. Should folks considered "white" and politically "liberal" be generalized into having this attribute? No. It's racist to do so.

OP is quite bigoted and should know better.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (17 children)

As long as you don't "correct" or act like you know better that minorities, you will be a good Ally.

Don't say "I will help you!", instead ask "how can i help you?"

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I think there isn't a black and white (no pun intended) rule when it comes to standing up for someone else.

There are situations where it's appropriate and situations it's not.

And it's hard to say across the board to keep your mouth shut if you are white and see another group being discriminated against. Or to always interject yourself.

I'm a woman and I think of the times I've been in a situation where I really would have appreciated a man stepping in so that I didn't have to be the one woman calling out something so blatantly misogynist.

Because then I'm seen as the bad person. The snowflake.

But other times, I think . Men need to shut up about what they think women need or want about our reproductive health because they don't know anything. But I sure would like it if they supported what we said.

My general rule is. I back people up if they say something about an injustice and show I support them.

But if I see blatant discrimination and injustices being enacted on someone, I will call it out.

And try my best not to draw attention to the person being discriminated against and make them feel embarrassed.

load more comments
view more: next ›