this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
235 points (97.6% liked)

World News

55413 readers
3212 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. President Donald Trump said in a social media post this morning that "a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again," as his threatened attacks on Iranian infrastructure loom ahead of an 8 p.m. ET deadline.

Iran has rejected a 45-day ceasefire proposal and says it wants a permanent end to the war.

UN Secretary General António Guterres warned the U.S. that attacking civilian infrastructure is banned under international law.

The death toll so far includes more than 1,900 people in Iran, 1,400 in Lebanon, 23 in Israel, about two dozen in other countries in the region, 13 U.S. service members and 11 Israeli soldiers.


The TruthSocial Post:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116363336033995961


UPDATE (5:32 PM EST / UTC-04:00):

Motherfucking TACO Tuesday.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116365796713313030

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 63 points 4 days ago (3 children)

UN Secretary General António Guterres warned the U.S. that attacking civilian infrastructure is banned under international law.

Yeah, it is illegal. However is anyone to punish the US for it?

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 32 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Better write a letter to let know Israel that they can't legally genocide the Palestinian and Lebanese people.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh looks like they hit that mail truck. Got too close to the school they were bombing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A year ago, with the Greenland / Canada threats and idiotic tariffs, I begged that there be some kind EU ... GIGN / GROM / KSK type operation to eliminate Trump and his cabinet.

I guess people thought I was joking.

Since then, things have gotten literally insanely worse, kidnapped Maduro, blew up NATO, essentially destroyed 20% of the world's economy, etc.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

International law is totally meaningless unless there's people actually enforcing it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

We don't enforce domestic laws in the US either, unless we are talking about poor people.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 55 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm gonna murder all of you, and god bless you

Okay then...

[–] funkajunk@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

As in god bless their souls, AFTER I SEND THEM STRAIGHT TO HELL

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 42 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This is a pretty straightforward declaration of genocidal intent. If the Americans bomb civilian infrastructure, there is a credible case for accusing them of Genocide in the Hague.

EDIT: Historian Timothy Snyder also identified it as such, pointing that this creates legal liabilities up and down the American state: https://snyder.substack.com/p/the-president-speaks-genocide

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We are permenantly hyper fucked if the best interpretation of his words are bombing Iran's infrastructure so badly that Iran retaliates by destroying all oil and desalination facilities in surrounding countries, rendering them uninhabitable for millions.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Watch those betting sites for the US dropping a nuke, if a bunch of bets come in all at once (Trump insiders)….

I hate that what I typed above is plausible

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately you are correct.

Also check out the Pentagon Pizza Index. They also source some I to on active bets on such sites, although take their accuracy with a grain of salt.

https://www.pizzint.watch/

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This is the best case scenario. We're right now at a point where this is the desirable outcome of his words. THIS.

The US have utterly fucked this world in about a year...

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Republican traitor filth have completely fucked the world in a year....

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

~60% of the country either voted for him or couldn't be arsed to vote at all, declaring with their non-vote that both candidates were equally valid.

Sorry mate but... it's the US. It's not just a minority of people. It's the fucking president and administration of the United States of America.

If he was just a republican traitor and not the president of the country, he wouldn't be threatening with nuking a country.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bro straight up admitted to rigging the elections multiple times.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And yet, he only won by a fraction, not a landslide. However, it remains true that a good 30% of the country couldn't be bothered to vote. If only a portion of that 30% decided that maybe Harris was a slightly better president, we wouldn't be here today.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's what you want if you're rigging elections. If you make it too obvious too soon, someone might do something about it.

And it was the second highest eligible voter turnout in US history.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You had one candidate that was Hitler in orange. He said it, he had a nazism instruction book that he said he would be doing if he won.

The other candidate could have been a dog for what's worth AND SHOULD HAVE WON BY LANDSLIDE.

Yet, this wasn't the case. He might have rigged the elections, fuck... he surely rigged the elections... But if your country worked, he should have needed to rig them so badly that the scandal could have seen from anywhere. And, if even then, he declared victory, you should have done a real 6th jan to remove him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] domusaltera@piefed.social 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's just such an Epstein files thing to say. How can a President Epstein files those words and expect the world not to Epstein files in revulsion. To be brutally Epstein files he seems a little desperate. These are not the words of a sane Epstein files.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You do understand that evil people can do multiple evil things for multiple independent evil reasons, don't you? This "everything is a distraction from Epstein" is cringe.

[–] domusaltera@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

You know... you're right. I should be more Epstein files about it. You can't reduce a complex Epstein Files likes this to just one Epstein files.

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why does it make you cringe?

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

No sea lioning.

[–] ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He's gonna nuke Tehran isn't he?

Who could've guessed that eschewing the US's soft power they built up over decades for Russian style "might makes right" posturing and sabre rattling would not work? Trump is really speedrunning to "Chinese ultimatums" with this fiasco.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah this is the whole problem with the 'madman' strategy, when applied to nuclear armed states.

Its ... arguably much worse when the person employing the madman strategy... is literally a demented madman with a cult of personality atound him.

Hope you got your pip boy in working order.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Intrusive thought of the day:

Simulations suggest that evenly a relatively modest India/Pakistan exchange (modest by the standards of a full nuclear exchange between Russia and the US, you're still talking millions dead) would produce enough dust and soot into the air to seriously affect the climate of the planet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter#Recent_modeling

But that also implies nuclear winter exists on a scale. Even one H-bomb will have some affect. In principle, it would be possible to determine the precise level of nuclear winter required to combat global warming. Then, if the target country doesn't have nukes of their own to retaliate with, a nuclear power could drop just enough nukes to cause just enough nuclear winter to cancel out global warming. As long as they're the only one releasing any nukes, they could precisely control the scale of the resulting nuclear winter effect. Literally designing an act of mass genocide as a means of combating climate change.

:/

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (6 children)

It is kind of darkly hilarious that concievably, some specific amount of nuclear warfare would theoretically cancel out at least some processes that are currently already running away in global warming.

The... problem of course is that no one knows the specifics of this with any degree of certainty... and if you do not know the specifics, well the potential downsides are essentially infinite.

But, if you have the brain of a religious extremist, or malignant narcissist... well, nuance doesn't compute so well for these people, but they are also, somewhat paradoxically, uncommonly good at asserting their own will and power.

In summary... if God is real, they're a trickster God.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Killing millions of innocent Iranians in a nuclear strike is a quick-fire way to turn the entire world against you. I sincerely hope this is a TACO situation and not Donald truly losing the plot.

[–] classic@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

I mean, it is Taco Tuesday so lets hope

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

HOW did this Man ONLY get the FIFA Peace Prize!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Am I the only one wondering how the fuck a president has all this power? I thought USA was a democracy, not a fucking dictatorship. Who has voted for all these wars? And if it's this easy to just get around an approval, shouldn't this be your main agenda for coming elections in the future, because your entire system rewards a guy like Trump for doing whatever he wants.

[–] night_petal@piefed.social 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

TACO already happened, btw. Delayed by two weeks.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Yep, I just caught it, added an update to the main post body.

...

... fuck do i hate this shit.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago

I'm hoping if he gives the order to demolish Tehran, or worse, nuke them, enough people refuse to do it.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think he realizes how old Persian civilization really is

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

He would think you're talking about rugs...

[–] itszednotzee@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 days ago

If this shit was in an apocalypse movie people would complain about it being unrealistic.

No way a US president would say that!
Really? via a social media post? did they run out of budget for actors? "Praise be to allah"? did the writers forget which side he's on?

If he hadn't TACO'd before this would be terrifying. not to say it's not horrible still

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I don't want to have a nuclear war, my new birdfeeder is coming tomorrow.

[–] Klox@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Can you even imagine what Harris would have done?! Whew we really dodged a nuke.

Has Trump changed from pedophilia to BDSM?

"I'm gonna kick you in the balls and you will experience something wonderful. Then I will shit myself... again and you will watch"

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Smells like bitch wherever trump goes. He ain't going to do shit.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›