this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
625 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29362 readers
2653 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has promised to pardon his White House staffers, reported the Wall Street Journal’s Josh Dawsey in an exclusive report on Friday.

Dawsey, the veteran DC reporter, cited “people who have heard his comments” in the bombshell report revealing that Trump is asking his staff to operate with a sense of impunity.

“I’ll pardon everyone who has come within 200 feet of the Oval,” Trump reportedly told staffers “in a recent meeting to laughs.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atropa@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago
[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 232 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, dismissed Trump’s comments in a statement, saying, “The Wall Street Journal should learn to take a joke, however, the President’s pardon power is absolute.”

It’s just a joke, bro! Unless…

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 104 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Y'all are the actual government of an entire country. You shouldn't be making fucking jokes in the first place especially when it pertains to the law. And if this was a joke, it's not even a very good one.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 23 points 3 days ago

The Donvict operates this way, testing the waters to see how far he can go and see what might stick.

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

my kid reverts to "im just joking" when they know they fucked up, and they are 8. is the potus an 8yo?

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 days ago (4 children)

That’s not fair. 8 year olds aren’t nearly this dumb.

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago

Trump has no sense of humor, he doesn't know how to joke

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

It's not like he's blanket pardoned over a thousand hard criminals that attacked federal officers and property or anything. I'm sure this is nothing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When you start pardoning everyone... When you start operating so much outside of the law that this becomes SOP....

...You gotta stop and really question if what you're doing is actually right or not.

And this guy is the PRESIDENT? Damn man. For shame.

I know the US has had an extremely troubled history and is constantly making costly ethical mistakes. But... This is just like... An exceptionally dark time for the USA. And that's saying something.

Like, for real. What's the exit plan here? What's the actual outcome of this gonna be? How bad is this gonna get? And how do we, as people, overcome this?

All black pills and cynicism aside, this has got to stop, and the only way it's going to, is with leadership with power. What type of leader is going to be the spearhead for the step forwards?

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Biden already set precedent by pardoning his entire administration to prevent malicious prosecutions from this one. Motivation may have been different, but that doesn't really change that he just promised to do the same thing Biden did.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Trump weaponised the DOJ. Trump is a war criminal. Trump would pardon his illegal deeds regardless if Biden used that power, however, the former president had to pardon unless continuous prosecution seems like a fun everyday activity.

Trump will say he does what Biden did, but he is a living sack of human garbage so his comments mean nothing. By that logic Biden could've removed democracy too, as Trump started his first term.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The response to this needs to be a resounding, "LOL, no," from whatever administration comes next. The constitution gives the President the power of the pardon? Well, if gives Congress power of the purse, but we let him ignore that. The Supreme Court will intercede? One of them is married to a J6er, another one is openly taking bribes, and ar least three of them committed perjury when they told Congress said they wouldn't overturn precedent. Our country can't continue without accountability.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I guess a future president could fix it with more pardons. Make a list of people who if they receive mob justice from, the mob are instant pardoned. Might at least get the SC to rein in pardon power.

Because for me it's not really about the people in the administration. Yeah, they suck and should be sent to the Hague. But there have been so many people that have bought pardons from the administration and they are the worst of the worst. Talking people who robbed and killed the elderly, some of the biggest con men and fraudsters. So damn many, they don't even ever make the news.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been thinking about this a lot, but the problem is that the President can only pardon federal crimes, so if a mob drags Steven Miller from his house in California and kills him, the President can't do anything to intervene. However, I'm pretty sure that the President could pardon crimes committed in D.C., and the Supreme Court has basically said the President can't be held accountable for crimes committed in office, so in theory, a future President could order agents to take Miller into custody, bring him to D.C., and execute him. He could then pardon everyone involved and no one could be held accountable.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Considering that the SC has basically given the President king powers, the president could make an executive order that any place that domiciles those people on that list is considered federal property while they are there. The current admin has argued more absurd things then that in court already.

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He could do something really funny and have a heart attack before pardoning anyone.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 9 points 3 days ago

You had me at heart attack

[–] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They would have a weekend at Bernie's before they would let the public know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's quite literally not a way out for these traitors. That will just give the individual states easily winnable cases against anyone that accepts a pardon.

If the non-fascists take back Congress, we can change the current laws & simply extradite the rest of them to the Hague. And we've now seen how fast the federal government can move when it wants to.

At the very least, these traitors are going to be fighting civil lawsuits until they die.

[–] Shadisica@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If the non-fascists take back Congress.

Big "if" right there...

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

yeah agreed. I keep circling around the fact that our government is completely captured across every branch and party, and the interests that have it captured care nothing about Americans, or are hostile and just using us. The 2 political parties dictate the outcome for primaries, so they will never let an honest actor win a national primary unless a secret-decent person manages to sneak through their net, which seems unlikely given the grooming process politicians need to go through before they get any real power. Mamdani won because mayoral races arent as hard to enter and get funded as federal races are. But he did it despite the dems massive efforts to backstab his campaign into oblivion. Can that scale nationally? Seems hard to beleive. Bernie's candidacy and the outcome of his suing the DNC showed us that they can hand pick whoever they want at any time and the primary system is not legally binding, and need not be fair or impartial. Its not really an election.. Only the general election is.

https://observer.com/2017/05/dnc-lawsuit-presidential-primaries-bernie-sanders-supporters/

So whats inevitable now : Social programs and free speech/protests will inevitably be removed. I cant see a midterm win by dems leading to a turnaround in our national descent into fascism. Its really just a matter of time until some sort of revolution happens, and the centrists are just playing for time in an utterly doomed system. We're in a dead zombie democracy that was a watered down version of democracy even when it was alive.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 85 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is a pretty significant chance that Trump won't keep his word.

And that's if he doesn't just die before he has a chance to.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Generally speaking, you want to pardon your Capos because you don't want them ratting on you.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You say this as if trump thinks things through.

Hows that Iran situation going? Oh, he declaired absolute victory? How very odd, and also factually untrue.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And citizens are supposed to pay taxes to support these criminals?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

I guess if they do they feel represented by them, isn't that their whole thing?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Promises like his tax returns, the Epstein Files, payments to contractors, payments to rally organizers, that kind of a promise? Or the promises to stay faithful to his 3 wives, of which he cheated on the prior one with the future one.

Thwump has never understood the definition of the word "promise".

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Its the same vibe as that one kid in school saying "swear on my life on my LIFE that means if Im lying ill actually die i swear on my MOMS LIFE too im super serious"

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago

Openly manipulating markets and now betting sites for personal gain. They have already embezzled billions. Crypto scams up the wazzo.

The grift knows no end.

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 56 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I’d love it if the media would stop reporting that Trump doing the worst fucking thing imaginable is a “bombshell.”

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

But this is a bombshell, though? Would be the worst scandal of any other administration.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Every single day would be the worst scandal of any other administration.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How is this a "bombshell"? Like really? Was this not assumed? Hell we don't even know if this shit is technically illegal, immoral yes completely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

It’s almost like they’re criminals or something.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (10 children)

They can't be pardoned if people get upset enough and remove them

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A pardon doesn't magically suspend physics, that's for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So what. He promises a lot of things he doesn't deliver. Staffers know that best of anyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (7 children)

How do pardons work on war crimes?

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Trump has previously pardoned at least one guy convicted of warcrimes in US courts. So I assume pardons work just fine, for that purpose.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/dec/27/eddie-gallagher-trump-navy-seal-iraq

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

He will pardon anyone whose useful to him, regardless of the crimes. I'm exhausted trying to get people to understand just how destructive and dangerous it is for him to be in power. None of it matters. He's gonna get away with it all because too many people believe, for no good fucking reason, that something will stop him so the don't have to act.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He will pardon everyone who can afford it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmein@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

You know, you always have the power to void any pardons from Trump (create a new law). But that would require you lot to grow some balls which I don't see happening.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Why do they need assurances that they'd get pardons?

This is the guy that claimed anyone taking the Fifth was guilty, now promising pardons?

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Ok hold, that's fine let him do that. Now what the next president should do just assassinate them and then pardon the assassins. Since it seems that we can do whatever the fuck we want with the pardons now.

load more comments
view more: next ›