floquant

joined 11 months ago
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

When some chud on YouTube in 2025 says "'Woke' is ruining gaming," he means that awareness of systemic racism is ruining gaming. For him.

I don't think it even goes that far tbh. Especially for less political, more gamer-type "conservatives", it just means "the other side", forcing so many girls (1) into their game. Maybe it's just to deflect having to admit to being a misogynist.

And when an American politician calls himself "anti-woke", he's saying that he opposes the awareness of systemic racism. Not that he denies the existence of it, but that he'd prefer no one talk about it, so that it can continue.

Yes, exactly. No sane person would call themselves "anti-woke". Unless they're successful in subverting its meaning to be "those we'll put in concentration camps". Oh wait, that still wouldn't make you sane.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's not about claiming the moral high ground, it's just that you can't have a word that can be used to mean its opposite, even if "sarcastically". The word woke is just the past tense of wake, nothing else. It can be used to represent someone "waking up" from the hide-your-head-in-the-sand routine, or becomes able to see things from a new perspective. For the right, it doesn't really mean anything, but they are pretty much using it as the new "sheeple". Which doesn't make any sense.

But the important thing is this: if someone is ridiculing people for wanting to be informed, involved in society, or generally just themselves, the only thing they're actually insulting is their own intelligence and heart. If we let them have their use of woke as a generic mean insult, we lose sight of that.

More than swastikas, I think this case is closer to saying "you can use literally to mean figuratively because it's common use" to which I also say no, fuck that.

But yes, swastikas forever symbolise Nazism. That doesn't negate their original, positive meaning previously found in history, religion and culture. This is not an "achtually it's ok to draw swastikas because they are actually good". I'm just saying that context, and intent, matters. If you tattoo one on yourself as a westerner, you're a Nazi - and it's ok that everyone treats you like one. But should those original uses be stopped because it's now "forever bad"?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Don't let the alt-right dictate what "woke" means

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Astro may also be worth looking into if you'd like a SSG that is still capable of rendering some dynamic content

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the US. That's the point. If I get asked that, the other person generally has some degree of interest in my genuine answer

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

"market players":

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 5 days ago (4 children)

What gives them the authority to "plan" the lives of 1 million people halfway across the globe?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Still can't fathom why they would go with a dude that's the reincarnation of Ridiculously Photogenic Guy tho

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wouldn't want to get those inside its plastic bag

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Jazz nursery rhymes

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democrats aren't, and never were, a working class party

view more: next ›