this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
1453 points (99.4% liked)

Chaotic Good

854 readers
1 users here now

A place to post examples of chaotic good actions.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 6 days ago

Guess your lot didn’t read the Beveridge Report: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beveridge_Report

I’d say you’d be better off putting away money in a savings account for medical bills, but I’ve heard stuff that makes me suspect the insurance companies already shut off that avenue (e.g. prescription meds cost way more off prescription).

[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 167 points 1 week ago (6 children)

except that luigi didnt kill anyone and he's very obviously being framed

Based on what's leaked on how the bag, presumptuive murder weapon and evidence was handled this is completely true.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Luigi Paradox: He's not Guilty, but still a Folk Hero.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not a paradox. He is doing two things that are absolutely worthy of respect.

Firstly he is an innocent young man who is being dragged through hell for a crime he did not commit. He is suffering unjustly for a crime he did not commit. Many people have gone through that and he deserves to be not only acquitted but so fully exonerated that the system is forced to compensate him for his unjust treatment.

Secondly, the cover provided by this case allows the real killer to remain hidden. I seriously doubt they would ever find the guy and the credibility of the prosecution would be so utterly smashed that even if they actually found the guy they might not make a move for fear of a public backlash. They might murder the guy, but that only proves they are far worse than any murderer.

So not only is Luigi innocent he is a hero, and I hope the real killer lives a long and quiet life.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They might murder the guy, but that only proves they are far worse than any murderer.

But they'd get away with it, as they always do.

George Carlin on Assassination

[–] Gorgeous_George@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Man that list would look very differently if all those assassinations of Hitler and Stalin hadn't failed.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Yes, I noticed that progressives are far more likely to be assassinated than tyrants in modern times. Funny that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dude was with me the whole day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I see this sentiment expressed, but is there any evidence to support it? If he were really being framed, I'd expect his family, friends, lawyers, etc to be trying to spread that message as much as possible and publicly show that he couldn't have done it. Like publicly present his alibi or something?

I have no problem with killing the CEO. Even if there were 100% irrefutable evidence Luigi did it, I'd still think Luigi was a good guy.

Why do people think he's being framed?

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The cop was rifling through his bag for a couple of minutues, closed the bag and took it away for 10m, came back, started searching the same bag again and this time managed to find a gun.

[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago (17 children)

There's been a blatant push by media to forward the idea that Luigi did it. All they have to do is ... not report evidence to the contrary. What there IS, however, is a lack of evidence that he did it, if you take into consideration the fact that NYPD - who have a history of faking evidence - probably used a gun and fake manifesto to pin the crime on him. Innocent until proven guilty has gone out the window; even news outlets aren't bothering to hedge their language with 'alleged' any more.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] excral@feddit.org 30 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You actually have it backwards, it's innocent until proven guilty and so far the prosecutors weren't able to produce any usable evidence. So no one has to prove that Luigi didn't do it just like no one has to prove you or I didn't do it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Still can't fathom why they would go with a dude that's the reincarnation of Ridiculously Photogenic Guy tho

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 148 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Often, the argument against murder as a means of defending oneself against the bourgeois rule is the inability to pinpoint its direct beneficial effects. Well, here they fucking are : murdering fascists is good for your health -in fact, it can save your life !

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 121 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is a fun story, but Luigi didn't kill anyone. It was the Adjuster

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Correct, Innocent until proven guilty.

Got to keep reminding people of that while things play out. I do hope his defense is able to prove that the chain of custody of the evidence is suspect and that luigi isnt their guy, but we're seeing the trial play out through the media anyway, and they seem to have made up their mind...

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Luigi is unfortunately more than just a person at this point, theres 'Luigi' the flesh and blood human and then theres 'Luigi' the symbolic martyr robinhood saint of the modern oppressed empoverished.

The actual court case and the real human being have become secondary to the abstract symbol giving a face to peoples frustrations and vengeance fantasies. Many people want him to be the one who did it to make the cultural icon legend a for sure reality. If Luigi were proven innocent many people would believe anyway and go wink wink nudge nudge. If he's proven guilty, it only furthers the martyrdom and fuels the fire which is what protestors ad anarchist really want more. Is a win win from a bystander pov.

People will believe whatever they want until proven otherwise and spout bullshit on the internet anyways but throw a dash of emotional bias into the mix and it really starts to cook.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Luigi has the wrong eyebrows and not enough people are talking about that

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 119 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (5 children)

well that's great for this one person but this is just an anecdote, and not reliable data. we need more data points to create a large enough sample size so we can refer to more reliable statistics. i wonder how we could get that.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Trading one horrible motherfucker for even one of his potential victims is absolutely enough for me. I don't need further statistics.

Edit: in light of my brain recently being reactivated and understanding what the comment was saying, please disregard my low IQ comment and let the science commence!

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No dude, they’re saying that we need to repeat the experiment

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

performative gasp i would never!!!

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah. Yeah! We need to robust science on this shit. The more data points we have, the more reliable the research, right? Heck yeah, let's get on with it then!

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That’s just responsible statistical analysis, any good scientist will tell you there should be several tests for a proper experiment.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zealousideal_Fox_900@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

GLORY AND HONOUR TO MANGIONE!

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I was getting jerked around about precisely how the prescriptions got filled around the time that it happened, and there was going to be some bullshit about Blue Cross not covering the medication because it wasn't bottled while Venus was in retrograde or what the fuck ever, and then it was magically covered. The coincidence wasn't lost on me.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 23 points 1 week ago (6 children)

So if you have a brain tumour they won’t pay for it? Forgive my outsider ignorance, but isn’t the entire point of medical insurance to cover situations like that?

[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems to me like the entire point of insurance companies is to collect your money monthly in case some future event happens, then try their hardest to not actually hold up their end of the bargain if you actually need it, then raise the prices afterwards if you do get a successful claim. So you pay for them to act like they're doing you a huge fkn favour at their personal expense and not like it's their fkn job that you've been giving them money monthly for.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

that's why insurance is a scam. You pay them unfathomable amounts of money for YEARS, then you want to use it, and you have to pay more, only for them to try their fucking hardest to deny you. Usually if they do accept you, it's already too late and you're terminal. Insurance is a fucking scam.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

All insurance is gambling. They are betting that you'll pay thousands in home insurance or car insurance, and never make a claim, like most people. It's a good bet for the insurance companies.

But Health Insurance is different. Unlike your house burning down or your car getting wrecked, which seldom if ever happens, EVERYBODY gets sick, and eventually dies. It's ALWAYS a losing bet for the healthcare insurance companies. They have no choice but to rig the game so they can win.

That's why we need to forget about Health Care INSURANCE, and think in terms of Health Care MANAGEMENT. That needs to be in the hands of an entity that isn't motivated by profit, and that's the government. EVERY other country in the world understands this, but America is a Ferengi nation, and we literally worship profits. And mean LITERALLY - Prosperity Doctrine is the most powerful religious philosophy in America at the moment.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Insurance should be like social security: handled by the state, with the possibility of having a complementary private insurance if you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You think insurance exists to serve customers? Lmao no, they exist to make their shareholders wealthy beyond imagination.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The entire point of insurance is to take your money and there is no step 2.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

murdering CEO's is self defense

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

More accurately, Defense of Others, which is as valid as Self-Defense.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

"we need Robin hood"

"For what?"

"Financial stuff, you wouldn't understand but you should buy it"

Robin Hood shows up.

"Oh fuck. Do you think he knows we were lying? He wasn't supposed to actually show up. Do you think he'll shoot us?"

"He's kind of famous for it. Like legendary famous. You probably should have referenced King Midas if you were going to misinterpret a myth"

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

They approved a friends expensive drug therapy around that same time. It didn't save his life but it definitely prolongs and improved it. The thing is these Cluster B nightmares that make statements like that can only see it if its them who needs the saving. Otherwise they are cold blooded death mongers.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's a life for a life. Why shouldn't we do more? I guess at some point they will retaliate, but still...

[–] whuwu@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

I actually think it's time for the people to retaliate.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Every one of us knows someone against whom the insurance companies have pre-retaliated.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

luigi hasn't been found guilty so anything that refers to a shooting is supposition at best

load more comments
view more: next ›