this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
342 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84069 readers
2953 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_armchair_potato@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

The writing on the wall says this will be required to access anything on the internet. I'll go a step farther and say, DNA will be required to access the internet. Only once life would be impossible to live without access. Getting closer and closer.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

I'll be their brown-eyed girl...

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

In the context of online dating, I actually agree with implementing the same level of KYC checks that banks and credit card issuers have adopted. I also think the FTC needs to step in and break up the monopoly Match Group has created.

All of these platforms are littered with fake profiles, scammers and foreign women searching for the means to a green card. It's made them practically unusable.

[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's Tinder; shouldn't it be scan bobs and vagene?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

"The app said scan my eye. It was non-specific as to which"

[–] PerfectDark@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe it is finally time for open-source(ish) dating to make an impact!

(It won't. I tried it a couple years back and it is a ghost town!)

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

It's probably a Goldilocks zone thing where too few prevents it from working, and too many will inevitably be overrun by bots and scanners.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, people didn't like the idea of giving their ID to third parties? Let's move up to irreplaceable body parts. Next step: your fucking blood. Good luck declaring that one stolen when the database inevitably leaks.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 6 points 13 hours ago

That reminds me of my ex, she was willing to give her physical address and phone number to anyone who asked, but not her email address, because of security concerns.

Proof of humanity on Tinder. That'll be the day.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, you! Yea, you reading this.

This scan won't work on you. The app will get lost in your eyes. 😏

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

If it's anything like whatever eyeball tech my local DMV was using last time I had to go in for a new license, it won't work because I have to forcibly open my eyes so ludicrously far, like Gowron on meth, that I would never put that on their app.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I just watched a video on this the other day, apparently scammers (like the types who do romance scams, pretending to be a gorgeous guy, then taking all your money) are getting around this security function.

They upload all stolen pics of a gorgeous guy (probably exists for women versions too) then there's one picture of them, because they have to have one pic of themselves to get the verification tick. But that one pic is obscured, like a face on a billboard or add on a poster on a street. And then tinder verifies the whole account, regardless of the other pics. I forget, it's either bumble or hinge, I think it was bumble, deletes all the pics that don't look like you, after verification, so those were sites that block that scam.

That's an aside from ai profiles. There does need to be something to protect users from scammers. I couldn't ever speak for what the best verification option is, myself.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

hey, you can't make bot profiles! that's our thing!

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago
[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago

Haven't used Tinder in a few years, but I guess I won't be using it in the future. I'm not scanning my eye to use what is arguably the worst dating app.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

The Match Group-owned platform is partnering with World, the identity verification project by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, to introduce a system that uses iris scans to confirm a person is human.

🤮

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

As soon as it mentioned eye scanning I assumed Sam Altman was involved. Didn't he have that world coin thing where he scanned a bunch of eyes in impoverished countries?

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

IIRC altman stiffed the Brazillians who scanned their irises in his scam, never paid a dime

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 4 points 19 hours ago

In 6 months chatgpt 37.5 bots will now be able to recreate human irises

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You want some fuk? Give us you biometric data!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 day ago

Well that was a quick decision to delete my account

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine still using dating apps in 2026.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

tinder is basically a hookup app.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What if I train a generative AI on thousands of images of iris's and start generating fake ones?

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 11 points 19 hours ago

OpenAI is the one running this "verification". That's exactly what they'll be doing with the data

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gee I wonder where one might get a database full of iris scans?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also in Minority Report, they do the whole eye scanning thing.

[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 73 points 1 day ago

“Let’s partner with a bot maker to prevents bots. This is not about collecting and selling user data. No, not at all” 🙄😑

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

What stops a human running Tinder bot profiles from scanning their eyeball, getting the badge, and continuing on their merry way of running the bot?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 106 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All they had to do was improve their facial recognition to scan all photos. Scammers would use fake photos and put their real photo (ai edited slightly) as the their last photo. This allowed them to get verified, but still scam. They don’t need more biometrics. Other apps are doing fine without your iris scans.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

From what I've read, the "dating" meat market apps are doing horrible. I doubt they want to invest in a sinking ship, at least more than they have to.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 day ago

Yeah but then they wouldn't get to collect people's biometric data to sell to the highest bidder.

[–] SlippiHUD@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Why are they so insistant of iris scans? What are they getting out of it?

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Data to sell

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 17 points 1 day ago

make the AIs better by scanning thousands of human eyes lol

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

No thanks, I'm out

load more comments
view more: next ›