this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Chicago Bears

2 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Among the 33 QBs with enough dropbacks to qualify, Bagent ranks first in the NFL, having been sacked on just 3.4% of his dropbacks. Fields ranks 32nd, the second-worst in the NFL, having been sacked on 12.9% of his dropbacks.

Maybe it’s the game plan, maybe it’s Teven, or maybe…JF1 simply can’t plug the trigger when he needs to.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hepatitisC@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Bagent: Pocket passer using a limited playbook where 1/3 of his throws were behind the LoS and most of the others were inside of 10 yards.

Fields: Mobile QB who has one of the highest deep ball % in the NFL.

Not really an apples to apples comparison.

[–] HopLegion@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I think everyone in this sub agrees Fields causes a lot of his own sacks. I'd say a lot of this is also OL getting better with Braxton back and Jenkins on the right side. I also think Bagent does a good job getting the ball out quicker than other QBs and limiting negative plays, but of course with that we lack explosive plays which fields has been able to create at a high level.

I am interested to see what it looks like this week with Davis back too.

[–] SonOfNike85@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

To be fair the defenses also played them differently.

This year every time Fields has done a fake/rollout the DE on the other team focuses on Fields and doesn't even think about the rb. That has not been the case with Bagent as QB.

[–] xtototo@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Bagent game plan was all quick dinks and dunks which involve minimal pocket time.

[–] Chi-Guy86@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

QB with limited tools being asked to do a lot less, i.e., lots of short, quick throws between the numbers. They’re game planning around Bagent’s obvious weaknesses as a passer

[–] getitupgetitin@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Are we still debating Bagent vs. Fields lol

[–] AdStreet2074@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The line is gonna look much worse if fields starts , and his truthers is gonna claim we have the worse Oline in the league and never to out the blame on the bust

[–] lkn240@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

To be fair - every single fanbase with a subpar young QB blames the o-line.

The Packers sub is doing it

The Panthers sub is doing it

etc, etc

[–] Paran0idMan33@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I’m pretty sure that if he doesn’t play well the rest of the season, they’ll say his hand wasn’t fully healed. Therefore we should draft MHJ and an o lineman and run it back with fields and a new coaching staff.

[–] PowerfulAd1661@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I mean this definitely makes sense…JF is constantly manipulating the pocket and moving around - making it so much harder on pass protection because their back is towards you so you give leverage back to the pass rusher being able to push off and readjust his rush.

Bagent stays tall and gets the ball out…he just has nothing else to his game aside from check downs. I think if he actually opened up and let it fly these numbers would look a lot worse. Can’t really sit here and say the offense has looked “improved”

[–] Academic-Business-45@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

That's what good backups do.

[–] Dunkypete@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Yet fields stores points

[–] Rex-Jay-Fields__Stan@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Fields: 2nd highest deep attempt %; #1 deep completions per dropback

Bagent: 5th lowest deep attempt %; 3rd lowest deep completions per dropback

Hmmm just maybe it’s based on the number of times they attempt to throw downfield…