this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
135 points (95.3% liked)

News

39106 readers
2583 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hundreds of Lindsay Clancy supporters, many wearing pink clothing emblazoned with phrases such as “Believe,” “She Needed Help” and “Peace For Lindsay,” gathered Thursday outside the courthouse where she is on trial in the killings of her three children.

Several of the 300 women, and a few men, said Clancy’s story resonated with them and that they wanted to raise awareness about how the mental health system treats women. Clancy’s lawyer does not dispute that she killed the children, but says she should not be held criminally responsible because she was mentally ill.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tzayad@lemmy.world 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just saying she was mentally ill is the understatement of the century. The framing of this headline sickens me.

She was in a full on manic episode, desperately trying to get help, and everyone around her failed her.

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

I agree. The headline and article are so different they might as well be unrelated.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

“She loves them deeply,” Cavanaugh said. “She carries immense grief.”

This is reminiscent of the guy who killed his kid by leaving him in a hot car and then killed himself due to grief. She will never escape the memory of what she did because the trial will highlight the entire thing. The media has painted her as a monster. Peace will never be in her life again as she has to live with what she did, regardless of the trial outcome. She will try suicide again.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean, it's a little different. In this case she is demonstrably mentally ill with postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder. Being committed is probably the best thing that can happen to her, so that hopefully she can get treatment. She literally was not sane when she did it and wasn't mentally capable of understanding her actions during it.

In the father's case, the dude was a neglectful layabout who routinely left the kids in the car so he could play fuckin video games without them annoying him. His wife had begged him repeatedly to stop leaving them in the car.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

From what I've heard, evidence has come out that suggests she might not have done it after all. Starting to look like there's a chance the husband did it and set her up to take the fall.

[–] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Starting to look like there's a chance the husband did it and set her up to take the fall.

Do you have a reputable source for this statement?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's time for our regularly scheduled ragebait distraction murder trial! Whose side will you enter the argument for this time?

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

They’re getting so much worse at it, it feels so inorganic.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The story is heartbreaking, and you are right - the community and system failed that family. Humanity failed that family.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

When too much support for women is maybe a bad thing.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

When fundamentally failing to look at any evidence is a bad thing.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Defending a child murderer. WTF. 🤦‍♂️

load more comments
view more: next ›