this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
431 points (98.9% liked)

Gaming

19960 readers
1 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 85 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Honestly after the Cyberpunk debacle I can easily see why, the decisions that led to that were almost certainly made by marketing and C-Suite and not the devs. Someone correct me if that’s wrong. If they actually learn from those mistakes I have no doubt they’ll reclaim the rep they had after the Witcher 3

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 68 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Honestly they've already reclaimed a lot of rep fixing cyberpunk, especially after the 2.0 update.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago

I think they’ve done a great job with that and I really enjoyed Cyberpunk, I mean more with the vast majority of the public there’s still gonna be a stigma whether it’s fair or not. That debacle was really damn visible, undoing that damage in totality is gonna take a new release without those major issues imo

[–] troydowling@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I picked it up on the Steam winter sale. Been waiting to play this one for so long and can't wait!

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I haven't really played cyberpunk at all even though I own the game

Is it even worth playing ?

[–] MajesticSloth@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I think it absolutely is. I played it a bit at launch and didn't find it near as bad as others but still set it aside. Started it fresh again with the expansion, and I had such a blast with it. You own it, so I see no reason not to a least give it a try.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Oh, absolutely, it's a completely different experience now than on launch. It's a properly good RPG nowadays, although your choices don't matter much in the storyline.

[–] _Lory98_@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago

Yea it's worth playing now. It's not a masterpiece, but it's fun enough.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly, unless you’re on last gen consoles, it’s been worth playing since launch. Its bugs were no worse than Skyrim on consoles, and less bad in many ways. The game itself is probably the most open world immersive sim we’ve ever gotten. It’s not GTA, and it’s not trying to be. It’s not a sandbox, and it’s not a psychopath simulator like GTA. It’s a deep, philosophical, highly emergent single player game with a well-written story and competent acting in probably one of the most beautiful game worlds of all time.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't use Consoles because I don't like the paywalls

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 2 points 2 years ago

A reasonable position to take.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kraivo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They will not. What happened with Cyberpunk happened with Gwent before and nobody gave a single fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] kwozyman@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

The top level management: CEO, CFO, CTO etc. Basically, the big bosses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

i think that's a smart move on their part.

the CP2077 launch was rocky, but most of their previous games haven't had that level of hype. The Witcher 3 taking off like it did, gave them the confidence to go bigger. CP2077 is in a great place now, even if it didn't start that way.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Honestly, maybe they're just playing hard to get in order to raise the offer?

"Sure maybe we're worth about that... but think about what we might be worth in a few years."

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

I'm still sad about Gwent, though. The only reasonably priced CCG I've played, with beautiful artwork and fun decks.

As soon as Marvel Snap dropped, it sucked out whatever remaining air the game had left and even the smaller streamers dropped out of sight.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 29 points 2 years ago (20 children)

They're almost certainly right.

Cyberpunk wasn't received well, but they seem to have No Man's Sky'd it into some sort of shape since.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] 0xtero@beehaw.org 28 points 2 years ago

It would be nice if the entire world didn't consolidate into two mega corps. Good on CDR for having their own vision.
CP2077 + Phantom Liberty are excellent. I just started a new playthrough. I wish it had released in this shape.

[–] Computerchairgeneral@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good. Not every studio needs to be snatched up by a massive corporation. Embracer's yearlong meltdown is a great example of how that can end badly.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Every company that gets bought by another corporation either cranks out a few good games and then dies, or cranks out an okay game and then dies. The eventual outcome is always death.

Bullfrog, Raven, Westwood Studios, Bioware, Origin, Maxis, Viceral Games, all of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I doubt it. They laid off 9 percent of the staff this July. That's far away from the 2077 launch. I would guess it's after the majority of Phantom Liberty's development is done.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Layoffs are only a bad sign for workers. For the owners and investors, it's the standard strategy for growth.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Layoffs are only a bad sign for workers. For the ~~owners and investors~~ parasites, it’s the standard strategy for growth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Excellent. I'm eager to see the doings.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

they need to fire their whole ai department and theyll be flying lmfao

[–] gnubyte@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

oh I thought MSFT already owned them. I guess not.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

"Yet."

- Phil Spencer, probably

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I believe it. Lessons learned and all

[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Please correct me if I *have the wrong impression here but how much does a sentiment like this matter if some big bethesda shaped behemoth makes the moves to acquire? Wouldnt business sense dictate that you sell if the offer is juicy enough?

[–] dexa_scantron@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Maybe the owners care more about running a sustainable company that makes good games than they do about getting a bunch of money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The videogame world is weird. Say you are a small buisness in a miner town making cast and hardened steel parts for mining equipment. If a big manufacturer comes around and offers to buy you out, your alternative to saying "yes" is them, opening up their own buisness and driving your sales into the ground with cheaper offers. But if Bethesda says to CD Project RED "Either you accept the acquisition or we are going to make better games." CDPR can just say "Haha, good luck."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Fucking Based

[–] Maruki_Hurakami@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

For better or worse we need more developers free from the large gaming companies.

load more comments
view more: next ›