this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
617 points (97.0% liked)

Linux

48072 readers
1 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 162 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of course Linux is better for custom, purpose-built hardware. That's like, its main advantage for the commercial sector.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 82 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Because Microsoft ain't gonna make Windows any better for this form factor until it is way late to the game, as usual.

Windows is basically a product for corporations now. Consumer Windows is an afterthought most of the time.

However, I could be wrong with Xbox's theorized pivot away from hardware.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Consumer Windows is an afterthought most of the time.

Always has been

Windows is an enterprise OS with consumer features and macOS is a consumer OS with enterprise features.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What about Linux then? A 1337 OS with some noob features sprinkled in for color? Or maybe a server OS with desktop features stapled on the front?

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Linux is an everything OS with whatever features you want/need. Do you need a hardened enterprise server? Linux got you. Do you need a user friendly OS for even non-technical people? Linux got you. Do you need something that can do a little of everything? Believe it or not, Linux got you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or maybe a server OS with desktop features stapled on the front?

That is a very accurate description of Linux considering even X11 and Wayland are display servers. Pipewire and Pulseaudio are also servers.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't misunderstand what a server means, however. Just because something is called a server doesn't mean it's not made for the desktop. It's a technical term that doesn't necessarily relate to networking, it might just relate to stuff like inter-process communication.

However, Wayland is designed for the desktop environment. It's like the main reason why it replaces X11, which was designed for terminals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

I know this is a joke comment but Linux is for sure an enterprise kernel first and foremost. It did not start that way but that is how it has been developed and managed for many years now. Maybe the most incorrect thing anybody has ever said on record in the computer industry is when Linus said Linux was “not going to be anything big and professional”.

Linux distributions, which are conceived and managed totally independently from the kernel are available for every niche. Many of them are desktop and “consumer” oriented. With many Linux distributions, I would say that it is more accurate that they are hobbiest oriented more than what Microsoft would mean be “consumer”.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't know that Microsoft has any business trying to make Windows support these devices better....

Windows is entirely built around two pillars:

  1. Enterprise support for corporations, and team machine management
  2. Entirely open compatibility so they can run almost any hardware you put into it, plug into it, and backwards compatibility for all that for as long as possible.

Portable game machines are not an enterprise product. Nor do you care about broad hardware support or upgradability. Nor do you care about plugging in your parallel port printer from 1985. Nor do you care about running your ancient vb6 code to run your production machines over some random firewire card.

Windows' goal is entirely oppositional to portable gaming devices. It makes almost no sense for them to try to support it, as it'd go against their entire model. For things like these, you want a thin, optimized-over-flexible, purpose built OS that does one thing: play games. Linux is already built to solve this problem way better than Windows.

But, Microsoft will probably be stupid enough to try anyway.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Nor do you care about plugging in your parallel port printer from 1985

You haven't seen what I've been using my Steam Deck for. Gaming was not my primary motivation for buying it.

It's basically replaced my laptop. I carry a docking station, mouse, and full size keyboard with me. Eventually I'm gonna be using it for some robotics and remote control projects and other experiments. It's a full blown PC in a handheld, I mean, why not?

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That's great and I'm glad that works for you.

But most people buying portable gaming handhelds are not doing that. And the people looking for things like that are likely landing closer to a surface or standard laptop, which Windows already supports well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

windows optimized for handhelds is already a work in progress, its just not remotely done

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Microsoft has never, since inception, been able to ship an embedded Windows that wasn't a festering pile of dog shit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sebbe@lemmy.sebbem.se 8 points 1 year ago

Windows optimized for anything seems to be pretty much impossible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Thank you for making your comment licensed under creative common. I'll now steal it, repackage it and sell for 9.99$ without even acknowledging your existence

[–] java@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

But will you train an LLM with it??

[–] oce@jlai.lu 8 points 1 year ago

But at least you know you're a bad boy and Santa will know too.

[–] Truck_kun@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

But... it's a Non-commercial Attribution license. /s/ns

I'm joking, but on a more serious note for those that don't know, not all Creative Commons licenses allow you to monetize, and be sure to actually read which version of license is used if you plan to use a CC work for anything other than personal use.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Why did you license your comment?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Cause windows sucks and licenses?

[–] risencode@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, the extremely popular handheld PC gaming market.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] caesaravgvstvs@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As much as I love my steam deck and the os, I do wish it was slightly easier to install third party games.

I know it's not hard and I've installed plenty, but like it's so incredibly easy with steam that it's made me lazy to even install games I already have on gog

[–] natsume_shokogami@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not Linux or SteamOS, but both Epic and CD Projekt don't support their store client apps and launchers on Linux sadly, such we have to use unofficial ones such as Heroic Game Launcher

[–] AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

But gotta admit, its a damn good launcher! If i had to use windows again, I would install it instead of the other two for sure!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlanK0@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ideally it would be better to see eventually a variety of OSs based on linux, maybe forks of steamOS.

But for the time being, definitely adopting steamOS would be better.

[–] vojel@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well there is bazzite or chimera

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The problem that could occur is: Right now Microsoft doesn't care about Linux or competitors, every OEM has to buy a Windows key anyways regardless. If SteamOS actually becomes a shippable option, Microsoft's cavalier attitude is going to change quickly, and a lot sooner than it will take them to get an Xbox Handheld out the door.

[–] Sebbe@lemmy.sebbem.se 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why would an OEM need to buy a Windows license if the customer has no interest in using Windows?

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's in their licensing, and how MS-DOS became the de facto operating system of early PCs. If you want to license Windows, you have to pay for every unit you sell - not just units with Windows pre-installed, but every unit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DavidGA@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The deal Microsoft does with OEMs gives them a discount only if they pay Microsoft for every PC they sell, whether or not it actually comes with Windows.

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Embrace, extend, and extinguish Microsoft's gonna do what it does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are there more than just Steam Deck?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The next Ayaneo handheld is going to use SteamOS.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

To clarify, not an official Valve version, just in case somebody is wondering.

It's HoloISO or a modified version based on it, which is a Linux distro that bring most of SteamOS to other devices (except ones with Nvidia).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How many actual PC handhelds are there?
The link in the article that promises "plenty" of handheld examples talks about Steam deck, Asus, and... the switch. And that's it. And obviously the switch is not a PC handheld, so... ?

[–] wren@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (11 children)

There’s quite a few. Steam deck and Asus, as you mentioned, but there’s also AyaNeo, GPD, OneXPlayer, Aokzoe, Lenovo, etc. And many of these brands have several different models, if you’re counting individual products.

[–] TheOakTree@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MSI just announced their handheld PC too, it has an Intel (Meteor Lake) CPU with Arc graphics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›