this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
217 points (96.2% liked)

Games

39818 readers
1076 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess this is probably going to be the new shitty norm with bait and switch for reviews then nickel and dime afterwards.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Adding micro transactions after release is bullshit. There should be rules where it needs to be in from release or not.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Right. Some people wouldn't bother with a game at all if they knew there would be this. It's very deceptive.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Knowing they were charging for new characters was almost a dealbreaker for me. This would have stopped me if I had known.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Paying extra for characters IS a deal breaker for me in fighting games. It's literally pay to win.

That said, I've been playing Tekken since ps1, so I'll probably just pirate this whenever it's available.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] caut_R@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait until the reviews are out so people can‘t be warned, and the product can’t be dunked on and then…

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. If they'd announced this before launch, it would've been the only thing anyone talked about. There would have been a huge backlash and I'm sure a good percentage of the community would've dumped the series there and then.

This is doubly scummy. Glad I didn't buy it yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TF2?

but tbf that basically invented the lootbox which then made TF2 free to play

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

At least they made it free to play. These games are still charging full price plus microtransactions

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

TF2 was a better experience before it went free-to-play. I want a barrier that keeps the hordes of clueless children out.

[–] B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

TF2 before F2P was one of, if not the, best multiplayer games. It just wasn't the same after that and good community servers died out.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If they place something behind MTs, then I completely agree. But, if they want to add more cosmetics that don't exist yet, and they finance it MTs, and at a fair price, it's less unethical.

Announcing it after reviews... Hm. Sketchy at best.

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

If you tried the customisation, it feels extremely bare bones in comparison to Tekken 7. So I wouldn't be surprised if stuff was removed to add to the Store.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verysoft@kbin.social 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Just another lesson to wait months after a games release before even considering it.

[–] Vampiric_Luma@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Early access paranoia can finally be shared by all~ Yippeeeeeeee

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Review Bomb it on steam

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuckers waited until the high praise reviews were in

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Gaming publications should automatically retroactively set their score to 0 in this case.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hatsa122@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Divided? One must be pretty naive if they can't see the move they are trying to pull here.

Can't wait for f2p Project L to break into the genre and become the biggest and most popular fighting game.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean you've got people who are defending Bilzzard's newest horse armor bullshit so yeah.

ETA: Yup, got quite a few Hardcore Gamers^TM in the thread defending this BS already with 'it's just cosmetics', all fighting games do it, or won't someone think of the devs, like like they think the developers are getting a cut off the money.

Just sad frogs sitting in the boiling water.

[–] caut_R@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, you can find vocal people who will play the apologist for just about anything, it‘s baffling to the degree that I wonder if there‘s paid actors on social media in this sense

[–] harry_balzac@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely paid actors. These companies all have social media teams. It's not improbable that they create fake personal accounts to post apologist bs.

They also can buy sock puppet accounts and use those.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm sure Blizzard's really dumping a lot of resources into "shitposting on a Reddit clone with under 30k MAUs".

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Gaming "journalism" can't afford outright say "company deliberately tries to hide enshittification of their game" aloud. Might lose that access to selective early copies for review!

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Can't wait for F2P game from the company probably MOST known for in game shops??

[–] PapstJL4U@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Project L will not use LoL but Valorant as base.

Riot is a fan of fomo and high pricess.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Bait and switch. That's the move.

[–] Cossty@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean "new shitty norm"? Companies have been doing that for years already. First time I saw it around 2017 I think. I not sure about the game, but I think it was Call of Duty.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From what i gather, they waited until after the reviews were in. They got a good score, which i guess would have been impacted by the inclusion of microtransactions, and released them after the reviews were in. Sounds like they were trying to avoid the bad press they would have gotten for including them (or perhaps purchases even, from people starkly against the practice)

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Bamco knows bikini skins of their characters are gonna sell like hotcakes.

That being said, I’ll forgive them if they only release a Kazuya bikini skin with jiggle physics for his pecs.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It already was, activision and capcom both did that, and no, cheat DLCs aren't accessibility, cheats should be free like they were back in the ps2 days and earlier.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I mean let’s be real here. Tekken was originally based on 50¢ microtransactions

[–] Vipsu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I wish more players would just ignore these cosmetic microtransactions and go with the default skin or at least limit themselves to ones that can be obtained by actually achieving something in the game. Using default skin while outplaying people in competitive games could probably induce some people to make quite salty comments.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No, we're taking about Tekken. DOA has shitty mtx problems of its own.

Badum tis.

[–] pgetsos@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

DOA

Badum tits*

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shade@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›