this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
266 points (83.9% liked)

politics

24190 readers
3005 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 146 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

As a lifelong democrat, I find this to be very dangerous rhetoric. It sounds tonedeaf. Regardless of the candidate, being critical of politicians is a cornerstone of democracy.

I understand it's important to be a united front, but the need to seemingly bring dissenting voices into line is not a good way to do it. We cannot force people to say we have a perfect candidate for the sake of avoiding discussion.

Edit: a word

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 26 points 1 year ago

We cannot force people to say we have a perfect candidate for the sake of avoiding discussion.

They seem to believe if something isn't discussed, the other side won't notice and / or discuss it either. That's delusional.

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

I don't think we have enough nuance in our politics to have that as more than an idyllic dream.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, I'm still voting for Biden over any of the Nazis on the red team, but the whole funding-a-genocide-on-gaza thing is going to make it a pretty unenthused vote.

I really wish I could vote for someone on a basis other than lesser evil.

[–] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I really wish I could vote for someone on a basis other than lesser evil.

Down-ballot exists! That's where I'm most enthusiastic about voting. There might be some places where it's just lesser evil option in some down-ballots, unfortunately, but you're more likely to have a representative that represents voters within the down-ballot which makes lesser evil choice less likely.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

Down-ballot exists!

And has the added benefit of a vastly lower vote count so your vote matters much more. The general election for my state rep got like 4,000 votes. And it was a blowout as expected, so really it was decided in the primary where there were a little over 2,000. One of the other races was literally decided by a single vote!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If valid criticism of a candidate causes someone to decide not to vote for them, then so be it. That's how democracy is supposed to work. What's important is that people vote for who they want to lead them, period.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Funny how demanding unquestioned loyalty is a MAGA cultist quality.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

'Get your MAGA hat'

He's got it backward and needs to look in the mirror.

i.e.,

There are people who defend Trump, no matter what.

and

There are people who defend Biden, no matter what.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Sure, but we also have to realize that we live in a country with a two-party system and a winner-take-all electoral college. If you're not helping your candidate, you're helping the opponent.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Fetterman noted during an interview an uptick in Democrats who have become more critical of Biden lately, and said it’s only helping former President Trump.

If it were closer to the election, I would definitely agree, and maybe it is too close now, although I don't think so... if it is not too close, then Biden should be criticized by Democrats who have their ear to the ground to move him towards supporting more popular policies.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Listen, Coach Fetterman: We love your size and bombastic past but "if you aren't for us you are against us" is not the type of faux populism that is needed in 2024.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's not entirely wrong. I've been critical of Biden myself, but it is because I am concerned about Biden's ability to beat Trump. I want Biden to be a stronger candidate, and a stronger leader for that matter. Criticizing Biden is the best way I know to make him to better than he's doing now. Poking holes in candidates is my love language.

But I'm a nobody. I don't make headlines when I point out his flaws. Maybe somebody somewhere will read something I wrote, or at a minimum it becomes part of the rising din of concern, and Biden is forced to make an effort to speak to my concerns. That's the best I can hope for.

I'm not backing an alternative candidate. I'm not calling for him to step aside or resign. I'm not suggesting we all throw our votes away on some long shot third party candidate. Anybody who is doing those things is helping Trump. And it's hard not to think that they don't know they are helping Trump, which makes it hard not to think that their intent is to help Trump.

So while I think Fetterman ought to be more specific with his criticism of critics, I don't disagree that there are people who fit his accusation. I also think there are far more reasonable progressives and moderates who have voiced legitimate concerns that Biden should do well to hear. Hillary ignored many of those same criticisms, to the peril of all Americans. America would be a much better place if Democrats tried harder to be more than just the lesser bad option. "At least we're not traitorous rapists" isn't a campaign slogan that inspires confidence.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a primary. Vote for whoever you want.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Always vote for whoever you want. That's how voting works.

But know what you're voting for. Know who you're voting for. Our electoral system is inherently flawed.

Voting for some schmuck running against Biden in the primary might make you feel good about protesting one or more of Biden's policies. His support of Israel, his approach to border policies, his inaction on any number of progressive issues, whatever the objection, who else are you going to vote for? I know there is the pro-Palestine contingent in Michigan promoting a "none of the above" campaign, which is effective at registering your complaint.

But in the general election, it's time to put away such petty animus and defeat the orange monster that will destroy everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The “I’m a progressive until I’m voted into office” guy?! Nah fuck him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What a fucking disappointment this guy is turning out to be compared to all the love he got on his campaign. Not that I'd prefer Oz by any means, but it's still pretty crushing.

I'm increasingly sure that the rising tide of never-Biden-ers is going to send Trump back into the White House. People need to be pragmatic and strategic about their voting and encourage others to do the same. So I understand WHY he felt a need to say stupid shit like this.

But if you're not allowed to criticize Biden without being banished to Siberia, then he's actually insufficiently different from Trump.

I'd bet Biden would not agree with Fetterman's message. He's not a whiny little thin-skinned gremlin the way Trump is. Based on his political career, he can even update platforms and change policy based on that feedback. So yeah, lay down the criticism to him re: Israel, he deserves it, and enough voices might actually change the foreign policy here. Do not tell the critics their votes aren't welcome. Their votes are still needed. And hopefully they're smart enough to know that NOT voting for Biden will create even worse outcomes, even while they continue clearly and loudly speaking up.

[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (15 children)

I’ve said this before and got downvoted but I’ll say it again. I will not tell a Muslim person or a Palestinian that they should hold their nose and vote for Biden. If the guy in charge is actively supporting a genocide and is providing the weapons that are killing your family, friend’s family, or just someone with your same religious beliefs, I don’t think we have the right to tell them they are wrong to abstain from voting for the pro genocide of their people guy. If a president was actively supporting the Nazis in killing my people, I would not have voted for that president.

It is the candidates responsibility to listen to his constituents. Not be finger wagged into voting them.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I’m still on the fence about whether I can stomach knowing that I voted for the genocidal monster that can barely remember his name because he’s better than the fascist genocidal monster that wants to end whatever semblance of democracy we might have. This country is just the worst.

[–] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But he's the lesser of two evils! Doesn't that get you motivated to get to the polls on November? Lesser!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WOULD YOU RATHER eat a chocolate bar off a public toilet seats lid.

OR WOULD YOU RATHER Eat a chocolate bar out of a public toilet bowl.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It could be worse. We could have a dictator that regulates literally everything we do. My porn is anonymous for now.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It's unfortunately nothing new, but I do think the alternative is a new level of bad.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) panned Democrats who are upping their criticisms of President Biden ahead of the November election, saying they might as well don a “MAGA hat.”

Fetterman noted during an interview an uptick in Democrats who have become more critical of Biden lately, and said it’s only helping former President Trump.

Democracy! No longer allowed to question or criticize our politicians.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, what's his point we should never bitch about it when Biden does shit we don't like? I have a novel idea, maybe he should start focusing on public approval instead of you demanding that the public blindly approve of everything he does.

Yeah, I'm going to vote for him because the alternative is a bad fucking idea.

His criticism isn't out of left field He's earned this shit. It's not that he's an irredeemable president, but a significant amount of his campaign is not being Trump. And still we hope all the hell that that's enough.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (28 children)

While voting for Biden is the right thing to do in these circumstances, Fetterman has zero understanding of optics and apparently the oil companies got to him judging by his pro-Israel stance.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

This guy turned heel pretty quickly.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Supreme Leader is above criticism, and to believe otherwise means you're the one in a cult.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Destin Sandlin, aka the Smarter Every Day guy, got some great advice from Obama about negative feedback which I think Fetterman should take to heart.

But what else would I expect from someone from York?

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Folks talking shit isn't news.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is the guy (whom I proudly voted for) who was getting defensive because people didn't think he was as progressive as they were led to believe. The people criticizing Biden and Fetterman are typically liberals and progressives, not MAGA.

I think Joe Biden is grossly under-appreciated for what he's accomplished thus far. He's legit incredible (imo). He's also old as shit and I reject the idea that he's the only American citizen capable of running the country as well as he has for three years. Dude, take the W and GTFO.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›