this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
587 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24320 readers
3486 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The white supremacist right is penetrating the mainstream right with increasing ease.

The Conservative Political Action Conference is the premier gathering of right-wing activists and politicians in America every year, and it serves as a bellwether for the direction of the conservative movement. This year Nazis showed up.

According to an NBC News report, “a group of Nazis who openly identified as national socialists mingled with mainstream conservative personalities, including some from Turning Point USA, and discussed ‘race science’ and antisemitic conspiracy theories.” (Hitler’s Nazi Party was officially called the “National Socialist German Workers’ Party.”) The reporter of the article has video of one of them giving a “heil Hitler”-style salute in the lobby of the hotel where the conference took place and of other members of the group reportedly used the N-word.

This is a critical frog-in-boiling-water moment for the right: The mainstream organs of American conservatism are apparently acclimating to Nazis in their pot. That this group was able to mingle with participants at a high-profile conference, wasn't kicked out of CPAC, and wasn't appropriately condemned is a sign of how contiguous mainstream conservatism has become with white supremacist politics today.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 127 points 1 year ago (23 children)

I'm old enough to remember when Republicans and Democrats weren't that different... There were always key issues that they disagreed on but at the end of the day the majority of both parties just wanted what was best for the country, and they would even WORK TOGETHER from time to time when it was for the common good... How did the GOP go from that to this white trash hillbilly Nazi bullshit? Are they ever going to recognize that the enemies of democracy have taken over their party? When did they become so complacent?

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's always been there, Harlan Crowe has been a supporter of Clarence Thomas since the early 90's, and the difference between Confederates and Nazis is only razor thin, so those types have always quasi gotten along, or even where the Klan meetings were on w Wednesday and the Nazi meetings were on Thursdays for some of these people, meaning that there's a lot of crossover, especially when you factor in that Hitler was heavily influenced by the American Confederacy.

Where the Nazis really started showing up in public more was during the energence of the Tea Party, where the Alt-Right basically came out of the closet to join the Republican party.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Yep. The Confederates and the Jim Crow policies of the South were a huge inspiration for the Nazis specifically. If not, our own homegrown fascists. To make a recess analogy. Bigots have always been the peanut butter to the fascist's chocolate. They like them both on their own. But they love them together.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone keeps forgetting about the tea party. It cracks me up. This is totally the tea party having its effect on the right.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

....and the teabaggers were just a rebranding of the hatriots from the 90s. And they were a rebranding of the Birchers....this stuff goes wayyyyy back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Facism and race "science" has always been the backbone of American conservatism. We are just in a period of time where they are more open about it. And honestly, they might not even be any more open about it, it's just that social media makes it easier to see; legacy media has always been hesitant to call out the right's racism, when when it overt.

The modern Republican party was literally founded on anti-black racism. We've all heard of the Southern Strategy by now, but it was in 1957 that the RNC started "Operation Dixie" which was aimed at recruiting white southern voters (Dixiecrats) away from the Democrats.

By 1970, you have Nixon's GOP strategist saying this,

From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10-20% of the negro vote... the more negroes that register as Democrats... The more the negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes lie.

[–] tacomama@leminal.space 6 points 1 year ago

It goes back even further. Look up Frederick Ludwick Hoffman. 3 US Presidents proposed a national healthcare system. The answer was “no”. There are racist roots to why we don’t have healthcare for all.

[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

this is why I don't take seriously anyone who says that both parties are the same or two side of the same coin. maybe you could make that argument 40 years ago. but these days saying that is a shorthand to me that "I don't pay attention to what's going on in the news." clearly one party's mainstream has gone extreme and you have to be willfully ignorant to not see it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This was true only ~15 years ago. My how things have changed. The Tea Party replaced the old progressives, where like GW Bush even provided government funding to feed the homeless, teach kids, etc. Then even before that finished happening the Alt Right took over from the inside. Now I don't even know what to call the latest movement, although it seems to no longer matter if it is already over and the Alt Right is back in power with Trump at the helm again.

I have heard that the person most single-handedly responsible for the rift before all that was Newt Gingrich, who proposed the hard-line stance of obstructionism, where after that cooperation was seen as weak while before that it was a strength.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

9/11 deeply affected alot of emotion-first thinkers. It bothered the rest of us quite a bit too, but it hurt them in a way that permanently changed them. It was a major turning point in the GOPs course, since they primarily court emotion-first thinkers votes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a very good (and very long) article about all the ways Gingrich screwed over American politics. Not just the obstructionism, but the dirty tricks, gaslighting, nonsense propaganda, as well as the shift from actually governing to constantly campaigning during your term, can be laid at his feet.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

Thank you for sharing that.

He is not entirely wrong - the weaponization of such measures (e.g. gaslighting to name just one) is, if not quite "smart", then at least "tactical". i.e. even if your intelligence is about average but your emotional intelligence is roughly that of a 5-year-old, then yes indeed you can get your way using those measures. That is the largest part of the problem there: it works.

One quote calls out to me:

“It’s not viciousness,” ... “It’s natural.”

But it is entirely a whoosh moment when he understands the idea that for a lion to eat when it is hungry is not viciousness - that much of what he said is (somewhat?) true - yet entirely misses the point that when a human DELIBERATELY CHOOSES to engage in similar behaviors, especially when no hunger is involved, THAT is indeed "viciousness", essentially defined as:

deliberate cruelty or violence

Like, I get it - a homeless person might trespass to sleep somewhere that they should not be b/c they are cold. They might even steal a sandwich b/c they are hungry. That does not make it right but it is understandable. But how does Bezos or Musk not paying their workers measure up when compared to that? Why is the former called "theft" while the latter is called "just doing business"?

I struggle a LOT with the ethics of various matters in life. e.g. should I cease purchasing cheap chocolates, knowing full well that near (occasionally even actual) slave labor conditions are involved (even for those that claim to be "fair trade" or whatever - nope, it's nearly all a lie, according to that video anyway), or would that actually lead to an even WORSE outcome, to deprive those workers of that source of income, when they clearly have nothing else to turn to besides that which can offer anything close to that quality of life?

And I think I know the answer, given by another quote in the article you link to:

There’s something about Newt Gingrich that seems to capture the spirit of America circa 2018. With his immense head and white mop of hair; his cold, boyish grin; and his high, raspy voice, he has the air of a late-empire Roman senator—a walking bundle of appetites and excesses and hubris and wit. In conversation, he toggles unnervingly between grandiose pronouncements about “Western civilization” and partisan cheap shots that seem tailored for cable news. It’s a combination of self-righteousness and smallness, of pomposity and pettiness, that personifies the decadence of this era.

In other words, like Trump, people often give him too much credit. He may symbolize the turning of the tide, and he may even have fallen victim to their swings before most anyone else (at least, at a roughly similar level of power & notoriety), but he is no "driving force" of a man himself, and rather seems more like a child to me. Which notably excuses him from precisely none of his actions btw. It's just that the problem isn't so much him, as all of our society that will continue to elect people exactly like him long after he is gone.

Cancer is also "natural" I note, but it would take a severely twisted person to act like a cancer on purpose. Moreover, why would we, The People, CHOOSE to elect a Cancer to lead us?

You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.

[–] thesprongler@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

white trash hillbilly Nazi bullshit Don't forget that there are plenty of business suit wearing Nazis, as well.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to discredit any of what you said, but to add to this I think a big piece of this that often gets glossed over is that since then the parties have become more ideologically sorted. Back in the day, conservative Democrats often worked with conservative Republicans and progressive Democrats often worked with progressive Republicans, and that isn't really an option anymore.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Don't forget suburbs and car-centric city planning isolating people by wealth and white collar vs. blue collar jobs by removing the places where those groups would normally intermingle. And by race. The suburbs also sorted people by race.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not that different in the sense that the Democrats were the home for bigoted, racist Dixiecrats. And the Republicans had always been home for American fascism.

However, they've been wildly different since the late '60s early '70s. When the fascist courted The racists.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 95 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having two of the most charismatic Presidents in American history be democrats only separated by 8 years of the unmitigated failure that was GWB broke the GOP.

Clinton was a southern boy popular with blacks and racist whites alike. The GOP felt they had to go total scorched earth on him they were so frightened.

GWB was so bad he killed an entire ideology. His own brother couldn't even run under his last name he was so toxic.

Obama was black, and the white people in the suburbs loved him. That subversive of 'that natural order' further drove the GOP into insanity.

I can't even get into Trump, who is maybe the perfect reflection of what everyday conservatives have become, ignorant, stupid, and incredibly well off while whining about how they're not well off enough.

[–] shikitohno@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

who is maybe the perfect reflection of what everyday conservatives have become, ignorant, stupid, and incredibly well off while whining about how they’re not well off enough.

I wouldn't say they're that representative of a lot of everyday conservatives. A lot of them are doing pretty poorly, but they're ignorant and get pissed off at the idea that anyone else might benefit from a program they personally don't qualify for or disagree with. My father is absolutely convinced that if the Democrats had the political will and ability to implement a wealth tax, that he would somehow be absolutely murdered by taxes on his $10 or $11 an hour he's making at a Winn Dixie in Florida. He's also the sort convinced that welfare queens living it up with brand new cars and designer clothes are not just a real thing, but a common thing that happens that Democrats just don't want people to know about. He'd probably also chalk up his retirement sucking due to what limited social safety net we have in the US, rather than him draining his retirement accounts while he was unemployed before hitting retirement age so he could play golf and go hang at the bar with his buddies even though he was broke. Medicare is his right, though, he worked for that and earned it, but screw these poors under 65 trying to get healthcare with Medicaid. About the only thing he's missing for your average, everyday conservative is an unhealthy dose of religion.

[–] skulblaka@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago

He's also the sort convinced that welfare queens living it up with brand new cars and designer clothes are not just a real thing, but a common thing that happens

So where's his new phone and fancy car then? If it's that easy, go out and get your free money, king. Stick it to the Dems or whatever. If Winn-Dixie pays shit then go get on that wonderful welfare. After he buys his new car he should have some money left over to buy some drugs, too, right? That's how they think this works, correct?

Sorry, I guess YOU in particular aren't really the person who needs to hear my scathing sarcasm, but I'm getting really really extremely tired of this viewpoint.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The frog in boiling water moment was over a decade ago. They're openly supporting fascists now.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We never actually de-Nazified after 1945. Between Operation Paperclip, Operation GLADIO, and the rat-lines to Latin America, we just shuffled the Nazi deck chairs on the Nazi Titanic.

In October 1945, in order to constitute a working legal system, and given that 90% of German lawyers had been members of the Nazi Party, the British decided that 50% of the German Legal Civil Service could be staffed by "nominal" Nazis. Similar pressures caused them to relax the restriction even further in April 1946.

This failure to de-Nazify post-war Europe, combined with the need to engage mercenaries and scientists in the ramp up to Truman's war in Korea and the coups in Greece, Albania, and Iran, led to a kind-of global re-Nazification. Former Nazis took power in South Africa, in Brazil, in the newly reconstituted West Germany, and became influence brokers in Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey.

From the Prescott Bush and Thomas J. Watson days of outright collaboration with Fascist Governments to the United Fruit Company rampaging through Latin America to Reagan's Iran-Contra deal, we've been working hand-in-glove with Nazis practically since their inception.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Hey, just like we failed to de-traitor the American South after the civil war! It's almost like you have to pull that bullshit out by the root.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Frogs been boiled

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MSNBC thinks we’re gonna buy the bullshit framing that this is just now something that needs to be addressed?

Fuckers you’ve been watching this go by for over a decade, and you still want to act indignant. The failure of corporate news to fight trump will not be forgotten. Take your pathetic opinion piece and shove it up your earnings ratio.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They're right that it was a frog boiling in water situation, except that it started decades ago and the frog has been long boiled

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think the boiling frog analogy really applies when the frogs are never going to jump out of the water.

Conservatism is the foundation of nazism. They know it looks bad, so they publicly downplay it. But they still embrace their nazi constituency.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Exactly.

Try to tell a conservative that fascism is a right-wing ideology; they'll reject the premise every time. This is because either:

  • they're playing cryptofascist games and enjoy pissing you off
  • they're brainwashed into thinking evil=left and will never consider any alternative

So they're either on board or a useful idiot. I invite people to try it sometime if they don't believe me.

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I get the point of analyzing fascism in logical circles but to discuss the issue with the adherents sounds a bit "lost ball in tall grass" to me.
Who cares what Republicans think of the origins and prior applications of the ideology while they are exclusively leaning into it in the present moment? Frankly it seems like a strange jumping off point to change people's minds or engage in any kind of fruitful conversation.
My two pennies (by way of Ecco I suppose.)

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My suggestion isn't for the edification of fascists; it's to show leftists that conservatives cannot be honest about fascism.

We're in agreement that it doesn't much matter which option they choose, as the effect is the same.

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I see, thanks for setting me straight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago

The phone calls have ALWAYS been coming from inside the house. Because they invited them in...and asked them to bring their friends...

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That has been the goal of that movement for at least the last 7 years, to use the chaos of the Trump administration to slowly infiltrate the Republican right. Clearly they have been successful, and CPAC the last few years have been a bellwether of that (e.g. the message: We are All Domestic Terrorists)

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Trump did very publicly tell members of the Proud Boys, which is a recognized hate group, to "stand back and stand by". So in allowing Trump to run the party they must also allow in all these wannabe Nazis, as these are his people, his "muscle". He very much sees himself as the mob boss he has always wanted to be, but becoming president allowed him to create this cult that also has no issue answering his calls for violence.

Trump also has no loyalty to anyone, which is irony lost on a man that demands it from everyone else. And I think most in the party know by now that unless you want the cult putting the crosshairs on your back, you better stay in line.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump is really looking forward to the time he has enough power to celebrate his first "accidental" defenestration of a political opponent. That's how you know you've finally made it as a dictator.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nazis always were in the party.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but they didn't directly say the n word and are therefore not actually racist. -conservatives

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GhostFence@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The right isn't a frog in a boiling pot. It's reaching its final form as dictated by the Southern Strategy.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Correct the right is an ignorant thug in a white hood wishing we could have a redo of concentration camps domestically so he can apply to be an SS guard

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been saying that someone has collectively labotamized the republican party for years now.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's all the lead poisoning! I'm telling you! I've been saying it for years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

That frog was hardboiled years ago lol

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Observing from across the pond, CPAC seems at fever pitch.

Feels like none of the Christians know who they’re getting into bed with. It will be a high price for them to pay.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately there aren't alot of rational Christians left. Secularism has been on the rise for a long time, and unsurprisingly, the people who decide religion is no longer the way to go tend to overwhelmingly be rational people. Most of the current remaining Christians are emotional thinkers, easy to manipulate with "scary" words. Their version of being religious has nothing to do with what their super important book says anymore, most of them have no idea what it says, even if they have tried reading it. They listen to what people say, not books. They follow their local shephard, and all do whatever he tells them to do. You'll know them when you see them, they'll be the ones calling you a sheep.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Feels like none of the Christians know who they’re getting into bed with.

They very much do know. Christian Nationalists are the biggest segment of fascists in the US, and it's not even close.

You know what the inciting incident for their movement was? The racial integration of schools back in the 1950s. They decided to make a wedge issue out of abortion so that they could get more Christians to vote for racist policies.

The KKK is a conservative Christian organization. The United Daughters of the Confederacy espouses "Christian values." Nick Fuentes, an out-and-proud antisemitic fascist is loud about imposing Catholicism on the rest of the country.

It's not a coincidence; it's a plan.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›