The Scottish people wanting a referendum or not. Is the only matter of any importance to the issue.
HumanPenguin
Not to mention all the changes had 0 effect on fraud. Those gangs quoted were post the Tory changes. And represent a tiny % of the budget. Way below the cost of implementing the 3rd party check system.
But the did have a huge effect on both the motivations and mental health of disabled.
While increasing the amount of negativity/discrimination experienced in public.
MPs who call themselves the Blue Labour Campaign Group.
Given the significance of colour in party politics.
Using the name "Blue Labour" seems to be an open attempt to break party rules about supporting another party. While getting away with it.
These folks need to be treated as the Tories they claim to be.
Yep using grains of truth to misslead is common. In fact I'd say it defines the last 10 years or so of world politics.
Unfortunately, while I love the law. This would not class as a lie in court. Just an absurd interpretation of the plan.
Most families have larger houses than most single people. Those who bath children use more water than those who shower them.
So yeah, this change in charging could lead to some families paying more to bathe. Of course, it's a distortion. And could be applied to any tax with enough work.
Much as they do for any form of charge that effects the more wealthy. They are just looking for the angle that lets them distort its effect in votes minds.
A wise position.
Basic principle of labours suggestion sounds fair.
But I would suggest if the gov dose set rates based on property size as suggested. It needs to also take into account occupancy.
A family of 10 living with 3 generations or more. Should not be paying higher per ltr than a single banker living in the same sized house.
Given they are including gardens in this. They also need to consider the risk of developers using it as an excuse to convert all gardens to housing. As the long term cost to society of no one having free space is higher.
Yep.
But for fuck's sake. Let's put some taxpayers' money into public funded pools and gyms, again.
Post thatcher privatised gyms etc. It have become absurdly expensive for anyone on a budget to get regular exercise. And swimming really is the easiest for physically less mobile folks to gain from.
Everyone should have access to near by low cost swimming pools.
Thanks for sharing.
I have minor optic atrophy and severe diabetic retinopathy. Have to say, these fonts really do help.
They make reading much more comfortable for me.
Now, need to work out how to add them to my android tablet,
Yep. While they are registered to a home nation. As soon as you log into another nation's Amazon website, it asks if you want to change nation.
Having multiple addresses from different nations is no issue. You just need to be sure to arrange delivery to the correct one.
I've never done it via their mobile app. But via a web browser, it's easy.
A guess.
But considering it is glycophate. Used as a weed killer and pest controller.
The only source would be cotton.
All non organic modern farms world wide use glycophate. Because plowing is considered bad for the climate. If farmers do not plow turning over the soil and releasing co2. Then the only way to prevent weeds is chemicals. Hence glycophate.
Given cotton is used mainly for clothing etc. I imagine it has lower requirements for such toxins compared to food production.
So my guess. It is believed to be all brands. The article states varicose brands were tested and all had high levels. But given the low numbers I doubt the press is confident enough to single out any of these brands.
A Guess. But when outside the UK. Twinings is the most likely one to find in supermarkets etc.
When I lived in the US it was often all I could find. Or that evil US shit Lipton.
Had to go to British stores to find Tetley. And only being back in the UK for 15 years did I discover the truth.
"Yorkshire tea is real tea."
Raised rate post COVID may have some value as an argument.
If this nasty discriminatory attack opn all disabled. Had not started ion 2010 and included all that percieved raise in claimants.
Also note the times given for the raises all match when the UK government was found to be falsely rejecting PIP claimants. The governments claim in raised numbers matches with the start of court cases rejecting their outright denial of claimants.
2016 was the highest number of false rejection. And took a few years those cases to go through court. Being re-added to the claimants list just in time to create this claimed crisis.