LotrOrc

joined 2 years ago
[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Two blocks is not very far to walk to catch a bus?

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No historical event that mirrors these circumstances?? Are you joking?

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the US got their shit together and banned firearms at any point in the last 30 odd years things would have been a lot better though. Like the rest of the civilized world did.

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why is the American reaction to every single issue "just get a gun"???

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Dont think cops should have rifles to begin with, and if they didnt there wouldn't be any to steal.

Secondly there's more than one cops, and they are ostensibly trained, though I know that might be going too far. I think 4 or 5 of them should be able to successfully neutralize even a meth head without killing them. People are way too blase about cops just having the ability and immunity to just kill people. Whether or not they're drug addicts

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

Who gives a fuck about the drivers? They could make some public transport and it would be even better. Fuck the cars

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

I had to double take because this looks exactly like my dog did you steal him from my house

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I dunno my friends are pretty solid with emotional support when drunk or sober its not that complicated

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 48 points 4 weeks ago (10 children)

Maybe tazing someone isn't the best idea. There are other methods of suppression.

Also once it doesnt work, most police forces in most civilized places know how to take a man down without shooting him up, even if he is trying to take your gun. Its only in the US that cops seem to think fuck any semblance of a threat means I can start blasting people to timbuktu

view more: next ›