Who debunked this? I don't any comments debunking it.
Also if you read the article it has limited applications so it's not some pie in the sky you think it.
Magrath
joined 2 years ago
Young child, shrooms? Are you sure you're not the one on shrooms?
Was that suit nanotech? In the movies it never did any of the things that Tony's nanotech suit did that I can remember.
I think people who see countfeit stuff don't know what they are buying before they go on Amazon and order from Chinese brands. I know what I'm going to buy before I go on Amazon so I never have the issue. I just use it to check prices and buy if it's a good enough discount.
If nobody knows their a sovereign citizen are they really a sovereign citizen?
You're not missing much. Just says the dev worked on Stardew, when it will release and a copy and pasted overview of the game from the steam page.
It appears to be, but there only 5 pixels in the image so it's hard to ID.
You realize your taxes pay for collection too. So you either pay a private company or you pay the government.
These sites need to start allowing users to blacklist sites from results. We know which sites are useless but keep showing up, let us block them from showing up.
Guards are probably the biggest deterent. Metal detectors alone can't stop anyone.
Nobody knows who actually makes the products, just what name is on it. Better to throw Samsung in the article for the clicks.
I have feeling that's only gonna help those at the top. It'll make the sector easier to control by consolidating it, but if anything goes wrong their gonna fall hard. But I'm no expert in the field.