Me and all my friends all call them "Handys".
And to people not familar with English loanwords in German: Yes, the correct German pluralization ends with a "ys" and not as it would be correct in English: "ies". The same is true for "Hobbys" and "Babys", not sure if there are more.
You definitely bring it to the point here. "Can/Could" has two different meanings in this case (and many more generally).
Nobody can legally enter your house without permission. Vampires also additionally have a second restriction, they cannot physically enter your house without permission. A warrant removes the first restriction but not the second. A vampire policeman with a warrant can legally enter, but still not physically.
Most of the time the LLM version isn't the one there. It's "It's not only XXXX, it's YYYY."
Also I noticed I almost wrote exactly the same pattern as the one OP pointed out.
To showcase it, I prompted chatgpt to write me a few paragraphs on the importance of radio astronomy.
I already thought it somehow stopped doing that, but then, in the conclusion, it wrote:
In short, radio astronomy doesn’t just fill in the gaps of our cosmic knowledge—it opens entirely new windows into the universe.
Which follows the same pattern.
Tangetially related: For the people who don't know, I found out recently that x!! isn't the same as (x!)! (repeated factorial), in fact, !! is a LOT less big than repeated factorial.
For example, while 30!! is 4.286 x 10^16 (so a number with 17 digits), doing 30! and then ! the result of that, would be a number with an unfathomable 10^33 digits.
n!! is its own operator called the "double factorial" and is even smaller than the regular !, because it's the product of only the odd numbers up to n.
Edit: escape characters
Even funnier: This news article is so well written/edited, that the headline doesn't even state that he ignored the flaws; It clearly states that he ignored the sub itself. Truly the pinnacle of journalism.
Obviously I cannot speak to the story in the tweet actually happening, but I'm not so certain that this couldn't happen for two reasons:
And also because Animate Dead, the spell the blurb in the meme is from, reads:
Choose a pile of bones or a corpse of a Medium or Small humanoid within range. Your spell imbues the target with a foul mimicry of life, raising it as an undead creature. The target becomes a skeleton if you chose bones or a zombie if you chose a corpse (the DM has the creature's game statistics).
On the second part. That is only half true. Yes, there are LLMs out there that search the internet and summarize and reference some websites they find.
However, it is not rare that they add their own "info" to it, even though it's not in the given source at all. If you use it to get sources and then read those instead, sure. But the output of the LLM itself should still be taken with a HUGE grain of salt and not be relied on at all if it's critical, even if it puts a nice citation.
Yes but even they had some use beyond just 0 mana do nothing.
Doing stuff with Darksteel Ingot, while it can work, was always a meme and never meta.
In addition to what other people already said, without looking at the actual percentages, this could also just be random fluctuation.
Mostly Positive is 70-79%, Mixed is 40-69%. If a game teeters around the 70% mark, it can easily cross the threshold separating the two due to pure chance, in either direction.
Exactly, only twice as common. To put in other words: For every two times someone says "free as a bird", one person says "happy as a clam".
That is much narrower than the gap between something commonly said and something rarely said.
I've been to multiple museums in Japan (which is somewhat relevant because Nintendo is Japanese) that either flat out ban all photography (e.g. Ghibli Museum, Aomori Museum of Modern Art) or have some exhibits that you're not allowed to take pictures of (e.g. Tokyo National Museum). One exhibit I wanted to take a picture of had a "no photography" sticker on it, but it was on the opposite side from where I approached so I didn't see it, causing staff to run up to me when I pulled out my phone to point out the sign.
I've also heard from other tourists that "no photos" seems to be rather common there.
Btw, I'm not at all saying that they're justified at all, just saying that there are indeed places that forbid photos for copyright reasons. In my opinion, no photo would ever match seeing the exhibits in person so it is entirely pointless to ban them. Even professional, official scans of pieces don't come close.