snowsuit2654

"anonymized" sure. I highly doubt they read every message. I'm sure there is lots of de-anonymizing information in the messages themselves

For example--

Anon1: "hey jeff, wanna play Minecraft?"

Anon2: "sure"

Thus we know Anon2's name is Jeff. I imagine there's a lot of this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recommender_system

Great so I can see the highlight of the video and then close out before the ad?

Yeah it's honestly way more likely for someone to change the file type and break the file while renaming it, than it is for malware to get past Defender.

Isn't that kinda dangerous? Also potentially illegal depending on where you live.

Funny, I already had feddit.uk instance blocked so this is nice, lol.

I assumed all distilled alcohol was gluten free. Perhaps there are some odd production exceptions.

I know art is hard, but conceptually it would be cool to see a skilled artist take a child's drawing (and perhaps explanation) and turn it into a detailed piece.

Great video, thanks for sharing.

This is my first time reading about this. I'm very curious to hear a lawyer's thoughts on this.

If you change the bootloader to some other software, how could the company be expected to provide support for something they may have no knowledge of? Suppose I develop some theoretical SnowsuitOS and then complain to Samsung support when it doesnt run on my smartphone? It seems very likely that some conflict in my code could be causing problems, as opposed to an issue with my hardware.

I feel like to require this, you'd have to prove that the software is functionally equivalent to their software, right? (Side note, isn't this problem undecidable? Program equivalence?)

If you replace a wheel on a tractor you can pretty easily define what it should and should not do. Determining equivalence seems simpler with a physical situation. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure program equivalence is not a solved problem.

My point here is that I don't think it's reasonable to legally require a software company to offer support without limits, because they cannot be sure that there is not an issue with the (unsupported) software you are using.

No sympathy for him, but it got me wondering if it's really fair to subject elderly people and others who have difficulty standing to the "walk the line" test.

Honestly I was disappointed that it wasn't very spicy