this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10569 readers
468 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This all makes sense. If we're getting a nuclear deterrent with this, that would be money well spent. If it does not and we endure any significant austerity as a result, then Canadians might straight up replace Carney with someone who welcomes annexation. This might call for debt-spending to avoid that, but I'm feeling Carney might like austerity instead. I hope I'm wrong.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is no way the USA will allow nukes that close to their country. Did we forget about what happened when nukes were going to be located to Cuba?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh yeah, I think so too. We could possibly pull that off during a Democratic US government. But it's still unlikely.