this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
810 points (98.8% liked)

memes

17681 readers
2059 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

We need this in North America if we ever want to solve the housing crisis tbh. I'm talking Soviet-style, grey concrete commieblocks. Yes the buildings are ugly, probably lack amenities, cheaply constructed and not well maintained, but we desperately need cheap, dense housing if we're going to bring down the costs. Building more luxury Manhattan condos and suburban single family abominations does nothing to bring down housing prices.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We don't even necessarily need those, fucking row townhouses like old Chicago or New York would be a massive improvement in space usage and density alone. Just modify the design to have a garage in the back and make the alleyway larger. Hell you could narrow the front road if you do it right.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hell you ~~could~~ should narrow the front road ~~if you do it right.~~ and turn it into a pedestrian plaza with a few shops and restaurants.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

While I like the enthusiasm we are still talking about the US here, even just for controlled semitruck or emergency service access it would still need to be wide enough for say a firetruck even compensation with utility alleyways and back end garages. But you could set it up to be relatively easily converted to such a thing if the required modifications to infrastructure and emergency services are done, but even then it'd be twenty years off even on a rapid timescale.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To be fair, I didn't say make it impassible, I said narrow it. It's easy enough to make a pedestrian plaza that a box truck or a firetruck can fit down. It works in the majority of the cities and towns in Scandinavia. They're not going to build affordable rowhomes or high density housing in the states anytime soon so this is literally allll wishcasting from top to bottom.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair enough, though my point was moreso to do with how absurdly massive American fire engines and semi-trucks there are smaller tanks. A Stuart tank from WW2 or fuck even a M60 Patton are smaller than a standard American fire engine.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Tanks are pretty small, even European fire engines are bigger.

What’s fucked up is that tanks get better frontal visibility than American pick up trucks lol

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

3-5 story housing with no parking works in France/Europe. No elevators/pools is huge cost savings. Room for cars ridiculously expensive where land is ridiculously expensive. Bikeable/walkable communities FTW. 5th story units would be cheaper, but young people need cheaper.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

elevators are required for ada compliance

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

3 story houses/buildings exist without elevators. There is no proposal to outlaw ADA compliant buildings.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

The percentage of poverty among people with disabilities is much higher than in the general population, so if you're building for low-income you really need to make it accessible. Also there's a lot of old folks who can walk, barely, but not climb stairs.

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is that, for the property owning class, the unaffordability of homes is broadly a feature and not a bug.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

For the property investor class. I assure you, the average homeowner isn’t happy about the idea of increased property tax, nor having to spend more if the want to upgrade to a bigger home.

Of course if you’ve got a mortgage and property prices go up, you can leverage that into and easier upgrade because you can use the increased equity in your property as collateral. I know someone who got a huge boost during COVID that way. Tiny studio to 3 bedroom. But mortgage payment went up 2 or 3 times too, so that doesn’t work if property becomes unaffordable altogether.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That’s how you create undesirable neighborhoods which eventually turn into ghettos. Many cities in Europe tried that and many of those neighborhoods quickly became unsafe and derelict. Like many of the banlieus in Paris or the Bijlmer in Amsterdam. Because people who eventually have the means to move out will leave asap. Nobody wants to settle in such a neighborhood. So only the poor and desperate stay. Which in turn means local business will leave as well.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

I agree with the general mission of FuckCars, but it always seems full of people who don't care about anything of what goes into a prosperous city that isn't the amount of cars on the road.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Look at how Vienna works. Contrary to other places, they did government housing blocks really well there.

  • The blocks are spread throughout the whole city. That means, there's no really bad place where all the undesirables are concentrated. This mixes the population. For example, I went to a school in one of the inner districts. In my class we had fresh immigrants that could hardly speak German. We had kids from poor families. We had middle class kids. We had kids who's parents were immigrants but who were born there. We had a kid who's parents played in the Vienna Philharmonic. We had two really rich kids descending from former nobility. We had a kid who was the son of a well-known lawyer.
  • The blocks do have an income limit when you get the flat, but that limit is very high (it easily covers everyone in the middle class) and it only applies when you move in. If your income increases afterwards you can still stay in that flat and still pay the same as anyone else. That means that you got a decent mix of people living in these blocks. There's not only poor people there.
  • Most of the blocks are actually really nice. There's parks between the blocks with nice, old trees. Many of the blocks even have swimming pools or other special extras.

Check out for example this one here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alterlaa

It can be done well. It doesn't have to be crap.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah but that’s different from what the poster above is suggesting. They literally said cheaply build and no amenities.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, there aren’t really any Estonians moving to Lasnamäe. Some live there because it’s cheap, but you’re going to have to speak Russian to talk to your neighbours. Of course if you do, you can get drugs fairly easily, which is a plus.

It’s not actually unsafe or super criminal though, it’s just very undesirable and tends to attract the lower strata.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We need mass housing, but also a focus on aesthetics.
I noticed my area has done a nice job after visiting Chicago. Chicago was concrete, roads and parking lots, and barren. Fly back to metro Vancouver and even worst neighborhood has beautitul construction, parks, trees and flower beds everywhere.

[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean I agree that Vancouver is maybe one of the most beautiful cities in the world, but it's also one of the most expensive!

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I meant an hour out of Vancouver, Metro Vancouver... But still pricey

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

Cheap construction and poor maintainability is more expensive in the long run, I think it's possible to create affordable housing while still having longevity and a reasonable access to amenities in mind.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I honestly think commieblocks don't look that bad.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ok this is a soft rebuttal because I agree we need to fix affordability asap, but is intensification really the right path?

Like something else needs to be fixed or these super condos will just enable politicians to import even more people to maintain the unaffordability.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

We need mass housing, but also a focus on aesthetics.
I noticed my area has done a nice job after visiting Chicago. Chicago was concrete, roads and parking lots, and barren. Fly back to metro Vancouver and even worst neighborhood has beautitul construction, parks, trees and flower beds everywhere.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's even the point of living if we have to live like packages sitting in a warehouse? Living for the sake of being alive sounds like torture.

I'd much rather a cleaner healthier city scape to live in than a slightly bigger personal home space. I'm a garden person though so i prefer to be outdoors.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you live in an apartment, a condo, a townhome, a home or...?

[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I live in a wildly overpriced studio apartment. I would jump at the chance to move into a concrete block apartment with no AC and limited hot water if it took $500 off my monthly rent.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

if it took $500 off my monthly rent.

You think it would take $500 off your rent? Lol, they're not going to make things cheaper, just life more miserable.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wouldnt that just be supply and demand? Why would less comfortable housing not be less expensive?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If people want it, they'll pay more. If they don't, it will end up like the projects in Chicago.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Aren't the projects subsidised housing? I would assume that most people living there would want out if they had a chance

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

How much do you currently pay and how much do you think these commie block apartments would cost? Because where I’m from, a 1br commie block apartment is as much as if not more than a modern studio apartment.

The lack of AC and poor ventilation really show in the summer too.

Apartment blocks are nice, but I don’t want to live in the commie ones, they suck in many ways.