this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
370 points (98.9% liked)

196

4569 readers
1982 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 58 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

So, I'm sure this is a bad idea. But can anyone tell me exactly why? Years ago, in a desperate situation, a doctor told us to get antibiotics for fish and use them, and we had to do that a few times. Some animal products are identical or nearly identical to human products, some are quite different...

With this in particular, how is it different, and why is it bad?

[–] Waffle 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It has enough salt to cause a stroke or a seizure.

[–] toeblast96@sh.itjust.works 2 points 42 minutes ago

horses crave SODIUM

[–] 5parky@lemmy.world 34 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Because if you take horse electrolytes, you wake up the next day with your shoes nailed to your feet with an overwhelming urge to shit in the road.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 28 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

... so same old same old you're saying?

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This is why we have designated shitting streets.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

So, I'm sure this is a bad idea. But can anyone tell me exactly why?

With this in particular, how is it different, and why is it bad?

This is how to use what our parents called the information superhighway responsibly right here. Well done Sir/Ma'am/other 🫡

[–] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.blahaj.zone 74 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Chubbyemu explains it best: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=ifXH86-eIqk

But basically, the electrolyte balance that's healthy for a horse is quite a lot higher than what is healthy for a human (due to body mass differences, among other things). The magnesium in the horse electrolyte is actually over the lethal dose for a human if taken as written. You could theoretically take it and be fine if you calculate the proper dose yourself, but by that point you're better off just buying human products, I guess.

EDIT: I was thinking of manganese, not magnesium, but that's 1500% of the daily intake, not necessarily lethal dose. Sodium, though, is over the lethal dose.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago

Just to add to this, on human stuff, they have an incentive to not be sued out of existence for a single fuckup In horse medicine, it's kind of like "Eh, a stiff breeze could have killed that horse!"

That bucket of stuff is probably th same ingredients, but sourced from who knows where cheapest biddder, mixed together by eyeballing it for 30 years on equipment that's probably barely maintained.

I remember reading up on New Life Spectrum fish food a while ago and they were making the pellets on a salvaged pasta press. No tests for lead or any other contaminants because no one gives a shit about the mental health of ornamental fish. I'm sure it's slightly more rigorous for horses, but I doubt the sanitation, quality controls, and batch monitoring are up to human grade snuff.

[–] PacMan@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 hours ago

I somehow did not get the notification that he posted a new video thank you kind internet stranger. I have been a fan of his work for years

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Chubbyemu's videos are great, but sometimes the story seems a little over the top. Then I remember how many people live in this country/on earth and realize those situations must be happening all the time.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, 1 in a million happens more than 7000 times a day.

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago

It's the dosage I think. Chubbyemu did a video on this exact thing.

https://youtu.be/LUGdQnxuixI

[–] resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works 11 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know about this product specifically, but in general, animal food products are not regulated as much as food for people. This means it may not be as safe.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Depends on the animal and the jurisdiction. As far as I'm aware, dog and especially cat food is more tightly regulated than human food in the US.

Horse food though? Not so much.

And almost no other countries are victims of regulatory capture to the degree that the US is.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And almost no other countries are victims of regulatory capture to the degree that the US is.

That seems hard to believe, considering stuff like the "banana republic" thing - surely, the country that gets couped for the purpose of economic exploitation by a foreign power is captured more thoroughly than a country that had at least somewhat democratic institutions?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

You'd think so, but guess what country the corporations couping with impunity is almost invariably from?

Past the propaganda, the institutions of the US aren't actually that democratic. They've mostly been designed by and for the rich and powerful from the beginning but especially since the rise of Neoliberalism in the late 70s.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Before Trump, US institutions generally liked to at least keep up the pretense, which means that they often did have to make rules that aren't as bullshit as they could have been. In south and middle american dictatorships, they don't have to give a single flying fuck.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Before Trump, US institutions generally liked to at least keep up the pretense

Accurate.

which means that they often did have to make rules that aren't as bullshit as they could have been

Yes, but that doesn't mean that they weren't STILL 80-95% bullshit by volume.

In south and middle american dictatorships, they don't have to give a single flying fuck.

And they also don't have anywhere near the pressure from the most powerful corporations in the world.

Or elections designed to be unduly influenced by the highly organized and systemic corruption of corporations and their lobbies rather than the comparatively haphazard organization of less official corruption.

That makes a much bigger difference than the inherent motivation and fear of public resistance of the leaders themselves.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And they also don’t have anywhere near the pressure from the most powerful corporations in the world.

Or elections designed to be unduly influenced by the highly organized and systemic corruption of corporations and their lobbies rather than the comparatively haphazard organization of less official corruption.

In the case of banana republics, corruption for specific corporations is literally their reason for existence.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Yes, but that's just one corporation.

Being created by United Fruit (now Chiquita) doesn't entail anywhere near the corporate pressure on all regulations as being the home country of robber baron capitalism.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Specifically around things like cleanliness and packaging. Places that make vet medicine would not pass a health inspection.