Here is an Invidious link for a video (34min) and the original YT link.
Beijing is seeking to court Canadians with trade deals. But it is simultaneously punishing Canada for adopting anti-Chinese trade laws, which – as the Chinese are quick to point out – were implemented by Canada in response to American pressure to crack down on unfair Chinese trade practices.
Now, we’re seeing growing numbers of Canadians twisting the logic of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” They’re taking this to mean that the enemy of Canada is the United States, and by that logic, the People’s Republic of China must be Canada's friend.
To offer his perspective on how Canadians should view these developments, Dr. Stephen Nagy joins Inside Policy Talks. Nagy is a professor at Tokyo’s International Christian University, and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. He’s studied and written extensively about China and its influence operations in the West.
On the podcast, he tells Jamie Tronnes, executive director of the Center for North American Prosperity and Security (CNAPS), that the Chinese government has "invested very heavily" in a strategy of "elite capture" focused on political and business leaders, "giving them preferred access to the Chinese market."
"This is to lock them into a kind of dependent relationship," says Nagy. "And I think that this has made Canada have tremendous challenges in terms of confronting a country that really wants to change the global order in a way that is contrary to Canadian interests."
Among Dr. Nagy's analyses is, As US-Canada ties unravel, Beijing pulls the threads:
While current Canada-US tensions create immediate policy challenges, the documented pattern of Chinese influence operations reveals a systematic effort to exploit these frictions for long-term strategic advantage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macdonald%E2%80%93Laurier_Institute
@SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works
You appear to engage in some form of whataboutism whenever there are posts critical of China. This doesn't add value to quality of discussion.
The issue raised in the linked post are, of coure, valid, but feel free to suggest better sources for this issue.
For anyone going through my profile they can clearly see my problem is with poor and heavily bias sources. This has been done for Postmedia, Fraser Institute, Globe and Mail, The Canadian Press, individual reporters and even CBC with examples and links.
If you're referring to the comment about the other guy who's pretty much only posts about China. I think you were blinded by criticism of your post.
The comment I made showed that a company that's been around much longer than Tiktok has even existed and was caught doing the same if not worse things with no actions from essentially any government.
You guys view it as a distraction to the narrative that China is only country we should be focused on instead someone contextualizing the threats as a whole due to your bias.