this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
60 points (94.1% liked)

Canada

9952 readers
637 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The NWT government and city of Yellowknife are describing in tweets, Instagram messages etc. how to search key evacuation information on CPAC and CBC. The broadcast carriers have a duty to carry emergency information, but Meta and X are blocking links.

While internet access is reportedly limited in Yellowknife, residents are finding this a barrier to getting current and accurate information. Even links to CBC radio are blocked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Can the Canadian government please just have an official platform for sharing this kind of information? Why are evacuation notices going on Facebook???

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They do have these platforms, but many people have become dependent on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter to link to information.

So the territorial government is literally posting on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter telling people how to search for CPAC Canada and CBC Radio so they can find the sites.

Compare that to the duty of all broadcasters in a public emergency to carry the key evacuation information on radio and television and tell people where to get more detailed emergency instructions.

[–] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@StillPaisleyCat @ImplyingImplications

It's not a dependence in an addictive way. It's in a community way, where all news is shared on community pages for the benefit of the community because they rely on each other for survival every day.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Agreed. But this is a societal dependence.

Too many clubs, churches and communities organizations, and small businesses found Facebook easier to maintain than websites, so many people became dependent on that platform.

The challenge is that governments have a duty to meet their constituents where they are, especially in emergencies. So they send out Tweets, ‘grams and posts directing people to the information on official sites.

Before the Internet, people would turn on their radios or televisions. That’s why in most jurisdictions (including the United States) broadcasters and cable carriers MUST carry emergency broadcasts, superceding regular programming. The wave of climate-related emergencies raise the question of whether internet aggregator platforms should be required to do the same.

As an aside, governments and public new sources maintain websites that are accessible. Due to a Canadian Supreme Court decision requiring government platforms to be accessible to persons with disabilities, Canadian new sites have user interfaces that are adaptive.

[–] girlfreddy@mastodon.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@StillPaisleyCat

Remote communities in northern Canada operate differently than everything along the 49th parallel.

Stop using a wide brush to describe two completely different societies.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We can agree on remote communities having different circumstances, and social networks.

That said, I doubt that this would apply any less in the Okanagan communities where there are many people living on backroads and off the grid or in most of Canada outside the major metropolitan areas.

[–] girlfreddy@mastodon.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@StillPaisleyCat

Not really. I've lived in Kelowna and also in remote Ontario regions. The only similarity is that there's lots of trees.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kelowna is a significant regional metropolitan area.

But get into the bush beyond Vernon or up to William’s Lake and you will find that people who used to rely heavily on CBC and other AM radio in a crisis are looking to their regular internet sources. If that’s where they get their information, then that’s where government’s need to make sure it’s available in an emergency.

[–] girlfreddy@mastodon.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@StillPaisleyCat

There are cell towers in those regions vs few/none in northern regions.

That's the difference.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cell towers work in some but not all the smaller hamlets.

This doesn’t seem to the point however. Meta and X not carrying links isn’t a barrier for those who have no Internet access whatsoever. Whether north of 60 or not, a very significant portion of the population has become reliant on Meta and X to feed them news to the point that they don’t know where to get reliable evacuation guidance in an emergency.

As an aside, resilient emergency communications to the public a reason that the CBC will be maintaining AM radio stations that broadcast curve of the Earth. The public needs to know where to find that and have AM radios to access it however.

[–] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thing is, if there is an emergency, you are not going to force the user to follow a link. You are going to put the details they need to know right there. Something Meta and X are quite happy to allow.

There is good reason the payload the emergency alert system those cell towers carry isn't a link to a CBC article. That would be silly and would be equally silly if done on Facebook/Instagram/X/whatever.

The framing of this as a linking issue is hilarious and nonsensical.

[–] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

So the territorial government is literally posting on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter telling people how to search for CPAC Canada and CBC Radio so they can find the sites.

And the problem is that they haven't figured out how to hack into RSS feeds the same way?

Maybe getting the word out via Facebook, Instagram, and X is good enough? Outside of Podcasts, RSS is considered dead anyway. There are diminishing returns to consider.

The whole point in an emergency is to get the official guidance out to where people look first for information, not retrain them to go to official sites.

What you are suggesting is that Facebook and Twitter be legally required to push official emergency information from governments to the top. That would parallel what the broadcasters and cable carriers typically have to do. It makes sense, but given that they don’t seem to want to be obligated to carry government information except as paid advertising, this would require a new emergency system for internet platforms.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The point is that these alerts need to he on sites that people actually check.

I dont wake up every morning and scroll through the government's PSA website. I do wake up and scroll my Lemmy news communities.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I get texts all the time for amber alerts that I can rarely assist with, why can't an emergency message be sent over the same system?

CBC provides service in the north in numerous Indigenous languages, including through its Facebook pages which many in those communities rely on.

As a public broadcaster it has a duty to meet the needs of Canadians for essential information where they look not just in English and French on standard internet sites, or even their low bandwidth emergency ones.

[–] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@FireRetardant @library_napper

Because not everyone has a cell, leaves their phone on while they're sleeping, has good reliable service, etc etc.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Most people browse facebook or instagram from their phone these days. I'm not saying that only a texting system should work in fact there should be several methods ranging from radio, tv, internet, and those updatable information signs over hwys.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 0 points 2 years ago

IF the goal is to get as many people to see it as possible just hijack the DNS and point everyone to a government website with relevant information.

[–] muninn@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago