this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
19 points (95.2% liked)

Canada

10115 readers
540 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You're not wrong about the review being a non-story, but it's still messed up that the military would be thinking about directly fighting labour unrest and similar.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The military is not considering fighting labour unrest or similar. Disruption of labour is just listed as an insurgent tactic.

There is zero mentions of fighting labour unrest, or similar, directly. That runs counter to an overarching COIN principal of involving the local populace in the campaign.

The article author very carefully selected three paragraphs from a 300 page document, expanded on them, and tried to lead the reader to the conclusion you came to.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

Hmm, that deceptive huh? I guess I'll actually have to read the doctrine.