this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
272 points (99.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 129 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Numbers 2, 3, and 4 wouldn’t even cost the US government or Americans anything. Literally just “stop being assholes to Cubans, Venezuelans, and Mexicans living in the US” and of course the US will reject this.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 68 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If anything, by their own ideology it should benefit us. A freer market with more competition.

[–] Magician@hexbear.net 67 points 1 year ago

LMAO, the ideology is so dishonest too. The day the US participates in a fair competition is the day the US loses.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US sanctioned Vietnam after it kicked Americans’ asses, and it plunged Vietnam into even further desolation until they were forced to open up and enforced more capitalistic policies. They could’ve done the same with Cuba, but just like how the west will never forgive the USSR for defeating fascism in Europe, the US will never forgive Cuba for defeating US imperialism underneath its nose.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 58 points 1 year ago

It costs the US the most valuable thing it has, hegemony, which is why we won't see it in our lifetimes unless quite a few things change.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

Not even that, it saves the US money. Unironically, if the US was a smarter capitalist country, they'd lift the embargo and just try to cause Cuba to undergo another glasnost and perestroika by simply having capitalism prove itself.

But of course, this means corporations would have to be in it for the long haul, and they're too addicted to instant gratification to even avert a climate catastrophe.

[–] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 126 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Sensible policy like this goes right over the heads of the average American.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bloodthirsty boomers just want to genocide latin america instead.

[–] GlueBear@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Boomers* are the most miserable people on the planet. I've never seen a group so ready to kill themselves and everyone around them.

*Western boomers

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

They directly robbed from their children via the economy and indirectly robbed from them by destroying the environment. Caligula would blush at their wanton debauchery.

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think this was said on Chapo awhile ago, but boomers are willing to stack millions of corpses on the southern border so they can live in their Floridian retirement communities that will be underwater in a decade. I don't like to engage in generational politics but western boomers are largely ghoulish, soulless individuals who think they're the only "real" person and everyone else exists to serve them in one way or another

[–] GlueBear@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

It's okay to point out that out, "generational politics" doesn't really mean anything when the people you're talking about regularly engage in reactionary thought and practices.

Western Boomers are unapologetically reactionary

[–] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people who live to see boomer old age are largely the ones being served. The servant boomers are all dying off. That’s why the concentration of the archetype you describe exists among the old.

Capitalism literally kills the poor sooner.

Nah Boomers always sucked. Reagan won the youth vote, the based boomers were always a tiny minority.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*Western boomers

Baby boomers were mostly a western phenomenon anyway.

[–] GlueBear@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Ethnic boomers scare tf outta me, God forbid you bring up mental health

I think most of them literally have lead poisoning. Add that to all the propaganda they absorbed and most of their brains are literally broken.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What do you mean boomers lol

If democrats and republicans all got replaced by 20-40 year olds, they would still continue oppressive policies against Latin America and their voters, young and old, will support it.

Ask your average young liberal or young conservative whether or not they want to give stop punishing Cuba and give money and food to Latin Americans so they stop coming to the US. They will look at you like you’re a crazy communist - which I mean is true, but it’s not even because you’re advocating for communism. Hence OP’s comment

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I accidentally read this at first as a proposal by the president of the US and was shocked he was proposing this. Then I reread it and it made more sense.

[–] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read it initially as the Americans being angry at his proposal and were counting it on their list of reasons to support his political opponents.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean most Americans would be angry with this and maybe consider it a coupable offence.

[–] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's what I read it as at first.

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 84 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is far less than the US owes

[–] edge@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

Maybe he means $20 billion per country per year.

That’s still not enough though.

[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 76 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Fr. I keep telling people, if you hate immigrants so much, why do you support the policies that force/coerce so many people to flee to the Greater Satan?

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they live in lala bootstrap land where US foreign policy has no impact on the rest of the world and if people are poor elsewhere it’s because they don’t have enough entrepreneurial grit. “There is no such thing as society” on a global scale.

They think the shit produced by the shining city on the hill doesn't roll down

[–] edge@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago

They are completely unable to see the connection there.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried that argument years ago. I'm just convinced these people want the world to suffer. There isn't any other explanation. Cruelty for the sake of it. Cutting off their noses to spite their face.

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

There is though. They wanna plunder other countries and shut out their refugees to keep more for themselves. I go over to your house, trash the place and take all your valuables, go back to my house and lock it tightly so you can't get anything back. I have no interest in improving your situation, my goal is not the cruelty itself but my material benefit at the expense of whoever is a viable victim.

It's all about redistributing resources from the many to the few, to the in-group. Both materially supporting the out-group or letting members of the out-group into the in-group would completely defeat the purpose.

[–] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

because they hate Non-White people

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 61 points 1 year ago

"I'm gonna build a (sensible humanitarian aid package) and (America) is gonna pay for it!"

  • Johnald Don Drump, bizarro world president
[–] GlueBear@hexbear.net 59 points 1 year ago
[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

very reasonable

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I'm sure there's a whole load of legal and administrative paperwork to be done for that plan of distributing $20 bil per nation in ensuring its effectiveness, such an action would be a decent first step in creating stability across the americas.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Guess that's not the case if it's bombs they're sending.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

Hmm. Seems crazy, but basic human decency might just work!

[–] Poison_Ivy@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

It certainly is a step in the right direction, and would actually help in more than just immigration

[–] ChestRockwell@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago
[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consider this: Legalize ALL Mexicans living in the U.S.

[–] Quaxamilliom@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

and illegalize all white people.

[–] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago
[–] LaBellaLotta@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

You do really gotta hand it to em on this one

[–] trumpetnoises@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

bro forgot about nicaragua

[–] Site_Hating_Moid@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Sorry babe, cant spend that much money, im already sending my old buddy Israel all the monry wr had in the vaults as well as the clothes i pawned offy back