this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
758 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24832 readers
2017 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 167 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oh hey the Democrats are actually acting like they want to fucking win for once this election.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 89 points 11 months ago

Almost like the "young" candidate has more fight in her.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Never forget that about one week ago everybody was telling us "Suck it up. Biden will be the candidate. There's no chance he'll drop out." Biden bowed to the pressure because people were calling their senators about this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 89 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's especially amusing that Trump is reduced to a sniveling ball of cowardice by someone the Republicans keep trying to characterize as a "DEI hire."

[–] bss03 70 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They won't do it, but it would be baller to set it up like a debate, and have the moderator prompt the empty Trump lecturn and have the camera hold on it for 5-10 seconds each time. It would effectively just be a Kamala campaign interview, but with a bit of shade casting between each question.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Everyone forgets but trump dropped out of the town hall debate with Biden in 2020. Biden actually showed up and just did the townhall by himself. He came off pretty well but godamn did he look like Jeff Dunham's puppet Walter because they had him squinting up at a mezzanine of questioners with all the lights in his eyes.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's really weird that Trump wouldn't go to the debate

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 56 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Quite weird. Maybe it's because it would be past his bedtime? He IS the oldest candidate to ever run

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hey, to be fair- he’s a busy guy. He has a lot of things going on. Maybe he’s planning to sexually assault someone that day. Or defraud investors. Or defraud banks. Or defraud campaign fund contributors. Or defraud a charity. Or start an insurrection. Or try to pressure a state government to overturn an election. Or try to blackmail a foreign government into producing dirt on his political opponent, or maybe he’s cheating on his wife. Or stealing government documents. Or selling government secrets to our enemies….

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Seriously, he's got so much to do though. Like he's already set the precedent, can't get soft now. /s

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It almost has to be Alec Baldwin doing Trump at the no-show debate. Recent complications aside, his impression has always been the definitive one.

[–] raef@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (6 children)

I feel like there's be some ethical, possibly legal, problem with presenting an imposter as an opponent at an official debate. It's a bad precedent. Besides, Baldwin comes with too much baggage right now

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Shane Gillis gets the Trump scumbaggery down just right.

[–] paf0@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It takes a scumbag to play a scumbag.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Oh boy what'd he do?

[–] Crowfiend@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Besides, ~~Baldwin~~ Trump comes with too much baggage right now

Really? baggage is what makes him worse than Trump?

[–] raef@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say he was worse than Trump, just that running a shoddy film production that culminated in him fatally shooting someone doesn't make him a good associate of a presidential candidate

[–] Crowfiend@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would argue that 34 felony counts doesn't make Trump a good presidential candidate, but that didn't stop him. What's Alec Baldwin gonna do that will stop him from running at this point??

[–] raef@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I don't think anyone here is going to dispute that. Just that Harris doesn't need to associate herself with Baldwin

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 40 points 11 months ago (3 children)

They need to do what BBC comedy show did one week when a politician guest didn't turn up and replace him with tub of lard.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Also more recently when Boris Johnson didn't want to show up for a climate change debate, Channel 4 replaced him with a slowly melting ice sculpture instead. This pissed him off so much he tried to privatise and sell off the whole station lol.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

Man, American reporters need to attend some training over there!

[–] USSMojave@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago

Aww I was hoping it would be a sculpture of Boris Johnson himself. They should make one OF Trump and dress it in an oversized suit and everything

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Just put a big Mac on a chair and put Trump's nameplate under it

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Just to really piss him off, pair it with a Mexican Coke, ya know. The good stuff with sugar

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 4 points 11 months ago

We could do a chicken made of cheetos with a terrible hair piece.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Just put up a scarecrow with a Trump mask up on stage

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Part of the joke is how the debate process has been entirely hijacked by the parties themselves. News networks used to host these events, now they just get filming rights. The League of Women Voters used to present a neutral venue, but the parties went behind the organization's back to set demands more appealing to the candidates.

Trump refusing to participate in any kind of debate is just the latest in a long history of hostage-negotiation style organizing. I suspect they'll end up on stage some time before November, after enough horse trading has taken place. But it'll be so canned and superficial as to hardly matter.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I think they call that a scareboomer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (9 children)

She should just be unfailingly chipper, start calling him "old man" all the time, and framing everything around his insecurities.

"How they danglin' Old Man?" "Let the women speak, Gramps." "This country's too big for those tiny hands, Old Man." "Step aside and go yell at a cloud." "Shouldn't you be lying about your golf scores somewhere?"

That's always his plan of attack, so you KNOW it works on him. Mockery and dismissal will have him weeping with frustrated confusion. We've already seen the best he's got is "No, YOU are."

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] notsure@fedia.io 31 points 11 months ago

Trolls hate the light..bring it!!!!

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

They are going to call her weird for this, then go back and watch Clinton Eastwood yell at a chair.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 11 months ago

i wonder which would be more entertaining.. him being there or not

i would hope shed play clips of his policies (hehe) from his own mouth at his rallies

.. just realized how sad it is i used the word 'entertaining'.. these things now seem far from informational

[–] Statlerwaldorf@midwest.social 16 points 11 months ago

I would pay money to watch her debate a Conan O'Brien Clutch Cargo version of Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HItL9HhpP8

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

This is what they should do. Show up to a "debate", give Trump time to show up, start after a token amount of time has passed, and then just start answering the questions that the moderators ask with no need for a rebuttal. It turns from a debate into a televised town hall style presentation. Don't forget to interject that her opponent was too afraid to answer these questions at every opportunity.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Should debate kennedy, so it splits Trumps vote more. Kennedy already thinks he is working for Trump and will most likely drop out right before the election and endorse him.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 11 points 11 months ago

I'll bet Trump is looking for some of those injections he claimed Biden used.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

She seems to have developed some good political instincts after her pretty milquetoast run in '20.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m sure Kamala would like to hangout with the debate moderator instead

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago

The debate moderator would probably also be a better presidential candidate than Trump (I guess almost everyone would be better at this point)

[–] CrustyBus77@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Can't wait to hear her refered to as Madam President.

load more comments
view more: next ›