this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
828 points (95.4% liked)

memes

18531 readers
2938 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 173 points 1 year ago (5 children)

In Northern Ireland he supported "mixed" (i.e., Catholic and Protestant) child education. In 1991, he gave £8m to the Integrated Education Fund,[20] a grant-making charitable body which aims "to make integration, not separation, the norm in our education system".[21] Queens University Belfast also received grants of more than £100m,[20] for capital projects, child education and medical research.[22]

More controversially, Feeney gave substantial personal donations to Sinn Féin, a left-wing Irish nationalist party that has been historically associated with the IRA.[14] Following the IRA ceasefire in 1994, he funded the party's office in Washington D.C.[20]

Feeney supported the modernization of public-health structures in Vietnam,[18] AIDS clinics in South Africa, Operation Smile's free surgeries for children with cleft lips and palates, earthquake relief in Haiti, and the UCSF Medical Center at the University of California at San Francisco.[8]

Jim Dwyer wrote in The New York Times that none of the one thousand buildings on five continents that were built with Feeney's gifts of $2.7 billion bear his name.[1]

On September 14, 2020, Feeney closed down the Atlantic Philanthropies after the non-profit accomplished its mission of giving away all of its money by 2020.[25]

Immensely based

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We found him

The good billionaire

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 107 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While I honestly believe nobody can get that kind of money ethically, the fact that he actually put his money where his mouth was on philanthropy whike still alive, and almost all anonymously, is very admirable

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

You would not know who Chuck Feeney is, but you know the business he set up: Duty Free. He made billions during the golden age of air travel. I think you could become rich ethically by setting shops in places where millions of people run across 24/7.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

the fact that he actually put his money where his mouth was on philanthropy

Even setting aside the question of where the money came from, the theory behind philanthropy is fundamentally anti-democratic. The philanthropist establishes an untaxable trust and personally appoints a board of cronies to allocate limited resources based on an inaccessible group's whims.

I could go into the numerous failures and crimes of private non-profits - the Bill & Melinda Gates campaign to sterilize Africans in a nakedly racist effort to curb population growth, the Longtermist tech industry campaign to invest billions into generative AI in pursuit of a god-like superintelligence, the Catholic Church's enslavement and abuse of young people in their network of church run orphanages from Ireland to Guatamala to Thailand. But the bottom line is that using your economic position to play Sim City with other people's neighborhoods and livelihoods isn't charitable in any meaningful sense of the term. Its mega-maniacal. The utopian visions of the philanthropy's founder don't change that, even if your organization doesn't end up going the way of the philanthropy shaped Ponzi Scheme like Foundation for New Era Philanthropy or St. Jude Hospital's horded endowments

[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 103 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every super rich person who has this mindset should rigorously advocate fair taxation of their peers that is the only chances for a non revolutionary change.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, it is nice that billionaires give away their money, it would be nicer if the people could choose how that money was spent instead of the billionaires.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Not only that, but it's good for one person to donate their excessive wealth, but it'd be great if the other 2700 of them had to relinquish some of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The good billionaire... eventually? How many people never become billionaires in the first place because accumulating all that wealth in the first place is bad. Unless you have a billion in inheritance in one go or something.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you’re wealth is in stock that have voting rights and you founded the company, getting rid of the stock is risky as it reduces your control over the company. In that case, if you sell you stock to lower your wealth, a bad faith actor could come in and depose you. If you’re a “good millionaire” then this could then have the effect of lowering your charitable giving potential.

Stocks are essentially people putting bets on you and your company. Most billionaires don’t just become billionaires by themselves…the public anoints them.

And I think the public should be able to rescind that if the person does more public harm than good.

Yeah, great points.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it was anonymous how do we know it was him?

[–] radical_larry@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

He had a guy fawkes mask

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (50 children)

It still would have been better if workers got the money in the first place. There are no good billionaires.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Warren Buffett and Bill Gates created The Giving Pledge, a legally binding agreement to give at least half of their wealth to philanthropy by death or through last will and testament. It currently has over 240 signatures from over 30 countries.

https://givingpledge.org/

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago

"Can we have some of your billions?"

"Over my dead body"

  • The Giving Pledge
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

From the his Wikipedia:

More controversially, Feeney gave substantial personal donations to Sinn Féin, a left-wing Irish nationalist party that has been historically associated with the IRA.

He was a basically an Irish-American George Soros.

And it's down Along the Falls Road, that's where I long to be, Lying in the dark with a Provo company, A comrade on my left and another on me right And a clip of ammunition for my little Armalite.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

George Soros is not a good billionaire. The right wing delusion of him is such a convenient smokescreen for all of the actually horrible global conditions he's helped give birth to and gotten rich from, that I wonder if he doesn't perpetuate it himself. He's basically the final boss of neocolonialism, but because noone will teach you what neocolonialism is and how capitalism violently extracts cheap hyper-exploited labor and natural resources from the third world which amount to super profits for the billionaire class, most people don't see how bad he is.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

True but I drew that comparison since they both donated to left wing parties in countries outside their native homeland. Soros is a prick but not for the reasons that the neo-Nazis would have you believe.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›