this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
370 points (96.5% liked)

Television

1237 readers
273 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities


Other Television Communities

:

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.

  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.

  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.

  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.

  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.

  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags. ****

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 112 points 2 months ago (6 children)

If they think Doctor Who has "gone" woke, they have not been watching.

I remember Captain Jack Harkness flirting with anything that moves, regardless of gender identity or species.

[–] anomoly_@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

The last time I was sentenced to death, I ordered four hyper-vodkas for my breakfast. All a bit of a blur after that... I woke up in bed with both of my executioners. Lovely couple, they stayed in touch! Can't say that about most executioners.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately his behavior continued on set. Creepy dude.

But his character wasn't meant to be creepy, and I need to remember that from time to time.

[–] nadiaraven@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh damn, that's unfortunate

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago

Context fwiw:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/john-barrowmans-scandals-full-jaw-33702480

My opinions: Was he called out for exposing himself and being incredibly inappropriate? Yes.

Has he apologized and faced consequences? Yes, multiple times, but maybe not enough for some.

Is he a sexual predator? Probably Not.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 20 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I have to disagree a bit here, the recent writing has tried to very heavily shoe-horn it in, whereas in the past it was much more naturally present.

I think the worst one for me (before I quit watching) was with the enormous spiders in the hotel run by a very Trumpian figure.

"Trump" wanted to just shoot the enormous spider, but the Doctor stopped him saying "no weapons, ever". The spider then died an agonizing death caused by suffocation on-screen mere seconds later. Her offspring was lured and locked into a storage room with food, after which they would surely either cannibalize themselves or starve. Actually shooting them would've been a mercy at that point.

When presented with the Doctor's solution versus the "Trump" solution, I felt more sympathy for "Trump". And I fucking hate that guy. That's when I knew the writing just wasn't for me anymore.

There's a reason even the more diehard Whovians, who are very much considered "woke" are tuning out. It's not the cast, it's the writing.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Doctor has been pretty anti-gun for as long as I've been watching. Honestly I just felt the Chibnal era lost a bit of magic, less campy/extreme/wild ride feeling to it. The first new season I thought was pretty decent.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

True, but that translated into anti-violence most of the time. Here there was a chance to either give the creature mercy and kill it quickly, or let it suffer a horrible painful frightening death. At that point, what is exactly the ethical choice?

I thought the new run opened fairly poorly. Imo most of the issues I have with Who writing are still there.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

I have to admit I kinda stopped following the series after Capaldi left.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Arachnids in the uk was 7 years ago, with a different cast, a different show runner, hell a different production company and channel.

So if it was the one that made you quit watching, how can you opine on the current run?

[–] seventythreeyards@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Arachnids in the uk was 7 years ago

Oh ffs I wasn’t ready for that gut punch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

It made me quit watching Jodie's run (which is too bad, because I like her). I gave it a other go when Ncuti took over, and I really enjoyed most of Tennant's quick stint. But unfortunately after that the bad writing took over again and Ncuti also was saddled with some bad stories.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dragonborn3810@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So that was during Chris Chibnalls era of running the show, which is, well, shit (good video about it, its long though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8_A7n83Rh0 )

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah but my biggest criticisms haven't changed during Ncuti's go at it either. Not that he can help it much, he too gets crappy writing.

There was a brief resurgence in apparent good writing when Tennant took over, though the final faceoff with the Toymaker was deeply disappointing. Loved seeing Catherine again though, she was amazing in the 2nd episode.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

These are the same people who say Star Trek has gone woke.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Or that Rage Against the Machine has gone political

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm laughing at the "people just hate the bad plots" my bean i am a classic who fan. I have been since it was still on the air. I have seen shit that would melt their tiny minds.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ken Dodds on fire off the shoulder of Butlins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

They had a black astronaut in 1966.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 63 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

That engine is woke.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nobody who enjoys Dr Who for what it is, a series of morality tales and social commentary, gives a shit about if the Dr Who is woke or if the lead is man, woman or something between, let alone their ethnicity (though for sake of continuity they better have a british accent of some descriptor.)

What long time Who fans don't like is poorly written and executed stories, for which there has been far too many of in recent years.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 23 points 2 months ago

If Doctor Who isn't woke then the showrunner's fuckin something up

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You can't make something that's a pile of shit and then hide behind oppression from right wing assholes online. If you watch interviews of the showrunner he knew it was going to be terrible before was ever published when he basically said "It's ok to like things."

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (6 children)

What do we call it when the show has politics you agree with but you still think its too heavy handed and the messaging constantly feels like you're being talked down to?

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Patronising. RTD loves to be patronising because he doesn't understand subtlety.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

If I lived in a monarchy I'd be patronizing to everyone around me too, they're into that shit

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

Didn't need the Discovery part for 90% of the series tbh

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

No effing doubt.

[–] spectre@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

this is just how RTD writes Doctor Who, but people loved it the first time for some reason.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago
[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

when someone is patronizing and talking down to us it means either we are at work or on Reddit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Back in the Tom Baker era, they routinely talked of the Prime Minister as 'she.'

Those shows were made long before Thatcher came to power.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Doctor Who is responsible for Margaret Thatcher? Wow, maybe this show does suck after all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 months ago

I have more criticism over Disney being involved in production than anything "woke".

[–] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Rogue storyline proves that New Who has a writing problem that has nothing to do with being too woke, and, in fact, at least in parts more with being not woke enough. What reason could there be to hint at, introduce, develop, carry out, end, and bury a love interest all within one single episode, if not as concession for people against those story line to be able to avoid it altogether? Disney isn't actually progressive, they never were, and where corporate pride/POC representation is implemented it's because the cost calculation tells them it pays off, not because they actually represent any of those values.

The Doctor would never give up on anyone. Heck, in the next episode he cried more about some random guard post than the man who proposed to him. Until he at least attempts to get Rogue back I will have to assume the Doctor has either been replaced by some kind of doppelganger, or the writers at Disney lack the balls to actually portray a modern and gay Doctor after all.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They just don't want to take credit for making doctor who suck themselves. Doctor who has always been woke, but now it just sucks

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've always loved the themes doctor who tries to address in its episodes, but it's sad in the most recent seasons they seem to have lost any form of subtlety/intelligence...

It used to be episodes showing you a moral dilemma, raising the question and often making it clear there is no perfect solution. The characters would make choice, maybe not the ones you'd make, but from understandable motivations. Sometimes the bad guys would have understandable motivations, and you'd feel sorry for them.

Lately it has been so black & white. More like "see this guy, he represents trump, trump is bad, he is bad". No dilemmas, no raising questions, not letting you think for yourself or challenging your beliefs. More like "this is good, this is bad, don't think more about it please".

I also don't think doctor who has become more woke, but it has become so much less intelligent, no longer considering the viewer as a person capable of reaching their own conclusions. Everything has to be clear and black and white. And if you don't agree with the protagonists you're bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just hope the new seasons has some good stories, I stopped watching after a few Capaldi episodes the stories were less interesting.

[–] nadiaraven@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I watched the first new season. It has ups and downs, but definitely some good episodes in it. I also felt frustrated the longer Stephen Moffat had his run, and then Chris chibnall was straight up boring.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t see people defending the newer shows by saying the writing is great or the plot tight. I just see arguments about politics and social messages.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The show turned to shit many years ago, way before any wokeness. There's nothing to defend.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The corporations are just using the culture war to deflect any criticism against the bad product they made. Like criticize the new Assasins Creed or Snow White and people, especially the gauche caviar press, will call you a racist, even when you weren’t even criticizing the “wokeness”

[–] Val@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

this is what doctor who does. Just like in the 80s. It has it's ups and down, but its always changing. That's what makes it special. The doctor regenerates, the show-runner changes and the show moves on. It's not like the other shows that just get cancelled. It's doctor who. It's the longest running sci-fi show in the world.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

I look forward to future Dr Whos.

I’ve been watching that show for decades, and I have seen the ups and downs.

This cycle of shoddy work is unique because of the era. But if there is any luck I hope to see better dr who later, followed by something equally bad but different.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

I feel that the whole "Woke/DEI" era will be remembered as a poorly timed inflection point. On one hand, you had the media conglomerates, who, instead of investing in original content decided to put stock in continuations of established franchises which often had poor writing and were poorly executed. These works also just happened to have a "diversity" angel to them. At the same time, we saw the increase in right wing voices online that started to infiltrate the fandoms of those already established franchises.

Social media algorithms also began to push this kind of content to a wider audience. How many times have you seen a random Youtube video with titles like " X is WOKE PROPAGANDA TRASH! Hollywoke is in DECLINE! " appear in your feed or homepage? If the work in question was a critical flop (i.e. terrible), it was not a flop because of creative deficiencies. No, it was a flop because it had a non-binary black character!

You never heard legitimate criticisms like "Hollywood is putting profits before good entertainment" or "[Show or movie] had poor writing, bad acting, terrible direction and didn't contribute anything to already established canon."

Take Deep Space 9 as an example. A great show with a very diverse cast but that diversity would be useless if the characters weren't as fleshed out as they were. Now imagine what the discourse around DS9 would look like if it were made today:

"A New BLACK Protagonist? Star Trek Has Gone WOKE!"

"Jadzia Dax and Odo: Trans Ideology PROPAGANDA?!"

When a new piece of media comes out and there is a massive stir attached to it, ask yourself this: is the criticism warranted or is it ideology driven?

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I will still watch it for reasons..... .....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

The people who cheer for the replacement of historically caucasian/male gender roles with minority actors/women, are the same people who protest the replacement of historically minority/women roles with caucasian/male actors. And they wonder why there's push back.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›