this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
775 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck AI

3065 readers
501 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Mastodon)

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 month ago

Here you fucking go

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A few days ago I saw a comment say something like "what if I poured my heart and soul into the prompt to get the AI to generate exactly what I imagined in my head?"

To that I say: "None of that emotion will be translated by the AI. It would be more artistic for you to try your best and still make something that doesn't at all resemble what you imagined, because at least you actually put yourself into it, making it actually art and not just what amounts to a corporate logo."

[–] Foxfire@pawb.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think this question sidesteps something even more fundamental. Pouring your heart and soul into describing a world through words is creative writing, and obviously has artistic merit in and of itself. Why is creative writing such an apparently unworthy art form, that all of that effort would be better off tossed into the trash, and replaced by a machine generation based upon it instead?

If you genuinely have the desire and capacity to write in depth about worlds, and things that happen within them, simply posting that writing would be wonderful. Visual mediums are not the end all be all of artistic expression, or human communication in general. I write comments and express my ideas through words all the time, and I appreciate when humans do the same for me in return.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because in this case, they're writing a prompt. Prompts for AI aren't exactly creative writing. They're basically a series of keywords or tags. Figuring out which keywords work to get the thing to generate what you want isn't really creative, either.

[–] Foxfire@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's totally fair. I was trying to steelman the position of the prompting being a labor of love through intensive writing, because I felt that granting this falls flat, and seemingly treats writing as unworthy compared to a purely generated visual interpretation. I entirely grant that in reality, a prompt is about as creative as placing an order in a restaurant.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why do the pencils look fake?

[–] CorneliusTalmadge@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They are actually fineliner pens.

I haven’t used this specific brand so can’t say how good these are. But there are plenty of brands that make similar products they are available in assorted colors and tip sizes.

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

I have the purple Stabilo point 88 in fine (middle one in picture) on my desk. Had it for a few years, hasn't dried up or gotten empty yet. I like how the pen writes, but in general, I am not a big fan of felt tipped pens.

Definitely a solid writing tool though.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

When you put too much pressure on them the tip just splits. Happened to me plenty of times when I was in elementary school. I'd rather have a regular ballpoint pen tip.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's easy to say when you can doodle that well, fuck I ain't even gonna try much less compete.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

OP didn't come out the pussy drawing Mozart.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Dunno... doodles are too clean. Napkin is suspiciously clean as well = no coffee stains, no wrinkles, no bad poetry. Looks like AI to me, or at least Photoshop.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Please don't be this cooked... Not everything is AI...

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

If you zoom in you can see the feathering. I would sincerely doubt this was photoshopped.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Nah, look at how the ink blots up in random spots because it's on a napkin. Not only is AI not doing that, if it's photoshop, that is real talent

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI: Here! Scrape this one too. We'll make a soulless copy.

[–] TTH4P@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

I can't take full credit for this collaboration

https://i.postimg.cc/ZK3v0fQg/20250416-121954.jpg

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I drew this in roughly twenty minutes with a peice of scrap paper and a broken pen held together by a hair tie, I think it counts (im not very good at doodling)

[–] ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

im not very good at doodling

What you posted shows the opposite.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The "than" is not in the middle and I want to burn houses because of it.

Arranging text (especially calligraphy) by hand is so difficult (for me). Best I've come up with is writing it on separate sheet of paper then measuring it and laying it out, then hope you practiced enough that you do it the same on your work piece.